Weblog of xuefei

Feb 15, 2007 at 18:22 o\clock

Post Kyoto Protocol talks begin in Nairobi

 

The United Nations Climate Change Conference has opened in Kenya’s capital Nairobi. During the conference, the second meeting of the Parties to the Kyoto Protocol in conjunction with the 12th session of the Conference of the Parties to the Climate Change Convention will be held. The main theme of the conference is about Post Kyoto Protocol issue—how to further reduce carbon-dioxide emission after 2012.

 

After a dozen years of talks, Kyoto Protocol went into effect in February 2005. But the protocol only promised to reduce the CO2 emission between 2008 and 2012. Therefore Post Kyoto Protocol has begun among various difficulties. The talks are divided into two parts, one is the special working group meeting under the protocol. The talks are held among developed and transitional countries about their promises of reducing CO2 in the second term under the Kyoto Protocol; the other is to launch a long-term international cooperation dialogue so that the US and other countries which haven’t ratified the Kyoto Protocol can also take part in the talks under the framework of the UN Climate Change Framework.

 

The conference has aroused world wide attention, but to break the deadlock is not easy. As the launcher of the international climate change talk, the European Union is resolutely maintaining the current system, but with the expansion of the EU and the different economic development level, to form a unanimous stance and policy within the EU is very difficult. Meanwhile, the world’s largest CO2 emission discharger, the United States who announced to withdraw from the Kyoto Protocol in 2001 hasn’t changed its hard line stance yet. At the beginning of the Nairobi conference, the US representative has expressed that during the Bush administration, the US stance on Kyoto Protocol will not change. According to the UN statistics, from 1990 to 2004, the US greenhouse gas emission has increased 16%.

 

Compared with the Kyoto Protocol, the Post Kyoto Protocol talks will see difficulties in the balance of developing countries’ interests.

 

Of course, in addition to the negative aspects, there are also some positive factors. First with the implementation of the Kyoto Protocol, international CO2 trade market has developed very fast. Business circle has changed their original stance of boycotting the matter. Instead they have tried to support and participate in the process and opened ways to adapt the market demand and seek more business opportunities. Secondly, the Post Kyoto Protocol talks are conducted in many levels. Climate change has become the frequent topic of the high-level political dialogues such as the G8 summit and the Asia-Pacific Partnership on Clean Development and Climate. Thirdly, the conference in Nairobi is the first time that such a conference is held in Africa. How to improve African countries’ capability of facing the climate change and realizing sustainable development has aroused great attention from the international community. In 2005, some African countries and South American countries have proposed to take important measures such as reducing the logging of forests there. This will be included in the Post-Kyoto Protocol UN Climate Change Framework. This is also under discussion at the special working group meeting under the framework.

 

It’s not an easy task for the Post-Kyoto Protocol talk.

 

By Chen Ying from Chinese Academy of Social Sciences and translated by People’s Daily Online

Feb 15, 2007 at 18:20 o\clock

Three things people care----food, water and air

 

According to a recent environmental survey, 82% of the people care about food safety, 34% of them have encountered drinking water pollution cases and 42% of them care about air pollution. Wang Xinpu, general secretary of China’s Environmental Cultural Promotion Association said the survey shows that people’s environmental awareness is less than 60% if one takes 100% as a proper standard. The survey titled Chinese public’s awareness on environmental protection and livelihood index 2006 was published on Monday. Wang Xinpu says the index show that those who are highly aware of environmental issues are often willing to participate in environmental protection activities while those who are not aware of this issue also fail to take any environmental protection actions.  Wei Dongying is an ordinary woman peasant in a village in Hangzhou east China’s Zhejiang province. With her report and unremitting efforts, 13 enterprises who discharged pollutants without treatment were ordered to treat their pollutants or stop operation. Chen Faqing is a farmer in Yuhang district in Hangzhou. In order to improve people’s environmental awareness, he not only sold his own car to avoid emission, but also uses all means to popularize environmental protection awareness. Facing all kinds of pressures and intimidation, he is fighting with all those who violate the environmental regulations and pushed for the completion of environmental protection laws. He has established a website in environmental protection.(www.nmcfq.com) And they are not the only ones. More and more Chinese people started to report polluting enterprises. In 2006, there were 600 thousand people reporting pollution cases to relevant departments. The number was 30% more than the previous year. Food safety, drinking water safety and air pollution have become the biggest concern of ordinary Chinese. About 82% of the people said they care about food problem. 81% of people care about drinking water and about 73% of the people who were interviewed worry about air pollution. Most people think the environmental pollution has imposed severe negative impact on people’s health.   Last year there were many poisonous cases which were caused by soil and  water pollution. This has aroused great attention from the public.  Statistics show that about 300 million Chinese people in rural areas can’t drink clean water. And this is not due to natural reasons, but human activities. Many people express that they have encountered water pollution and air pollution cases.  The survey shows that among 11 big cities including Lanzhou, Datong, Linfen, Urumuqi and Beijing, polluted days surpassed one third of the year. About 15 million people have been affected by the pollution. Due to air pollution, traffic jam and noise pollution, many people in the cities are not satisfied with their living environment. About 10% of the people think the cities are not inhabitable.   About half of the interviewees in rural areas expressed that they have encountered serious pollution cases. Every year, there are 120 million tons of rubbish in the rural areas. All these pollutants are discharged in the open area and the 25 million tons of waste water there are discharged without any treatment. The environment quality of many farmers’ inhabitants are really in danger.   By January 10th, the State Environmental Protection Administration had stopped 82 projects which were against the environmental protection regulations. They included projects in iron and steel, electricity and metal with the total investment of 112 billion yuan or 14 billion US dollars. Some regions, industries and large enterprises whose projects were not compatible to environmental impact assessment are also facing restrictions in getting any project to start.   The survey shows that more than half of the people think the central government pays great attention to environmental protection. The government’s environmental protection policies, regulations and measures have won great recognition from the public. But they think more efforts are needed to change the environmental situation for the better. By People’s Daily Online 

Feb 15, 2007 at 18:19 o\clock

2006 temperature was record high since 1951

 According to 2006 China’s Climate Report, national average temperature in China was 1.1 degree celcius higher than normal years, becoming the warmest year since 1951.

The national average temperature reached 9.9 degrees celcius, 1.1 degree higher than normal years while both in summer and autumn, the temperature reached the highest level since 1951. National average rainfall reached 596.7 mm, 16.2 mm less than normal years.

Feb 15, 2007 at 18:14 o\clock

China ranks 81st in 2006 Human Development Report

 
font size  ZoomIn ZoomOut    

China was ranked 81st on a list of countries published in the 2006 Human Development Report (HDR). What does this mean for China? Our Stockholm Correspondent, Xuefei Chen, interviewed Kevin Watkins, director of the UN Human Development Report Office, during a seminar held on Friday in Stockholm about how clean water and sanitation will reduce poverty by half before 2015. The seminar was organized by the Stockholm International Water Institute and more than 200 people from the UNDP, business, NGOs, the water industry, and people involved in climate change and human rights participated.

China faces challenge in social equity

Mr. Watkins was the main author of the 2006 HDR. He said that China performed better than expected in terms of average income. Although the Chinese economy is huge, the enormous size of the population means that China's GDP per capita is still very low. Mr. Watkins thinks the real challenge for China is turning its huge economic power into human development in terms of health, education, the environment and so on.

"People in China are very aware of the big issues such as equality and health. I think the big challenge is how to prevent the inequality between different areas and high and low income groups from growing bigger."

Watkins said China has a strong record in immunization programs. These are among the best in the world in terms of coverage and quality. It also making the fastest progress in the world in terms of improving literacy and child mortality rates, achievements made possible by government programs.

The big challenge now in China is the decentralization of health financing. There is a gap opening up between the rich and the poor areas. "And that is a worrying sign," said Watkins. "Now we see some of the poorest areas are falling behind. We see personal illness become the major cause of death in a lot of rural areas; we see people excluded from the health system because they can't afford the fee. I think that is a very dangerous pattern. And I think what China is trying to avoid is a system like that in the US where you have first world health care for some but many people live in a third world health system."

Economic growth should be turned into human development

On the question of whether a GDP per capita growth comparison should be the focus of GDP growth, Watkins says it is important to have good economic growth, but the key issue is whether that growth is shared widely. If it is not shared widely, it can become a very destabilizing factor and over time will hold back growth. He used Latin America as an example, where inequality has become a barrier to economic growth.

"Economic growth should be turned into human development. More growth does mobilize more financial resources, but how does the government allocate those resources? How do they spend them? Do they tax one part of the country and spend in the other part of the country? These issues are crucial in the inequality of distribution."

He thinks it is a good sign that this issue has become an increasingly central part of political debate in China. "I think political leaders recognize that you can't have high growth when rich people are going like this and poor people are going like that because that will be very destabilizing. And it will also create problems like mass migration from rural areas and social instability. So people talk about China's path now. And I do think it is important that China counter balances growth with human development."

Watkins said that, in fact, human development depends largely on political desire to do so. For example, some countries such as Vietnam have performed very well in terms of child mortality and education, better than rich countries such as Saudi Arabia in the Middle East. In terms of water and sanitation, Egypt and Thailand performed better than some richer countries in Latin America. In Africa, poor Senegal performs better in terms of water than the rich Kenya. It doesn't matter how much money one has if the river systems collapses.

Mr. Watkins says there are two major problems in China related to water. One is that water resources in northern China are severely stretched due to urbanization. The development of more commercial agriculture means that more water has been taken out of the glacier system, resulting in the water level dropping. The other is industrialization.

"In any country the industrialization process carries away waste from factories and from human settlements, and that waste goes back into the water system. Now some countries are efficient in managing that ¨C Israel is a good example and to some degree, Mexico is another example. In Mexico they have very strict rules governing water from human resettlements. It can be recycled and used for agriculture, or treated and used again for drinking water. I think China has one of the biggest challenges which is to establish a regulatory framework for treating water in urban areas so that waste water does not filtrate into rural areas without treatment, which can spread disease.

"I think the government in China has acknowledged how serious the problem is. Actually, many people are very critical about China's water management policy, but it is also true that some innovative and positive things have been happening in China. For example, the development of a water demand management system in the north of China and an integrated water management system. I think the difficult thing is that even if you have good laws in place, even if the regulations are written on paper, they may not actually be enforced on the ground. What you find in a lot of cases is that there is a demand conflict between farmers, industry and urban areas, and whatever the regulations say, the small farmer will lose out because of the political influence of industry and urban areas. And that raises the basic question of how you make sure the weak voice of the poor people is heard in water regulation and management. So there is a need for decision-makers to be aware of the weaker parties.

"The tendency of the politician is always, if he has demand for water from two parties, one from the factory and one from the farmer, to favor the factory. These people have a lot of political influence in the Party, and they employ a lot of people in urban areas so he can't afford to upset them. Many politicians want to work with these guys, so the tendency is to give in to their demand. The farmers are disorganized, spread across many areas and they don't have much political influence. I think the critical role of the government is to give those people a voice and that means giving human development and the environment the same consideration as economic growth.

"In the long run, economic development gives you the resources to solve problems, but, if a whole river system collapses, then it doesn't matter how much money you've got, you can't create a river system. Some rivers just dried up in the north and the ground water level has sunk so low that the whole ecological system has collapsed. For these issues, you can't wait until your GDP doubles. You can't say that when our GDP has doubled, we will solve the problem, because it is too late. So you have to integrate it and recognize that there is a tradeoff and constraint, yes, there is some environmental damage, but there is a limit to how much damage the environment can withstand."

Treat water as a very precious national asset

Mr. Watkins thinks China should have a more efficient water management system.

"You have a lot of water intensive industries. What if you change the incentive structure so that you tax them for using too much water? Then they will develop technologies to produce with less water. Perhaps farmers, instead of having a huge irrigation system which draws from rivers, can have small-scale dripping irrigation, targeting the crop more closely. I think that is what the government needs to do to manage the market," said Mr. Watkins.

"You need to treat water as a scarce resource. I think most countries, including China, over the last 50 years, have treated water like it will always be there. I think the government should stop thinking water is free goods, and start thinking it is a national asset, very precious, and that we need to attach a price to it."

Mr. Watkins says that attaching a real price to water will make people use water more efficiently. "That creates a mentality (for factories) that if we have to pay to for releasing waste water, then let's set up an infiltration system so we don't get charged. Or if we use water and we are going to get charged according to volume, then let's take measures to lower the volume of water we use. That mindset will send the right signal to the market, but the government must also recognize that farmers are living on less than one dollar a day and cannot pay the same price as factories, so there needs to be a social pricing system for people who are marginalized."

Watkins says to carry on doing what the country does now is not a good prescription for the future. "After all, you have to say what you are facing in a country. You can carry on as you are, but in the end, the severity of the crisis will ultimately have an impact on growth. You can't escape the fact that these factories which need cheap water to grow will not have cheap water to carry on as they are. So something has to change. And the big issue is how do you facilitate the change. The government can do a lot by creating incentives and establishing the right support to smooth the way for change."

A better way of resolving the water shortage is managing demand

Mr. Watkins thinks that diverting water from different areas is only a temporary solution. In the long run, people have to be aware that snow from the Himalayas can perhaps only support humankind for 100 years because of climate change and global warming. So the main thing is to manage demand and do things within current resource capacity, to slow climate change. The better way is to avoid ¡®hydrological debt' and manage water demand.

"In north China, water use is two or three times the volume of water flowing through. If you carry on using that amount, the consequences will be very visible as the ground water table will collapse, and soil erosion and desertification will make the river system dry up. And that is what is happening."

Watkins says there should be a water management policy to say that "we have hard facts proving that we only have a certain amount of water and that we must scale down water use. How do we scale down? We must levy a tax, invest in more efficient water use, dripping irrigation, new technology in small-scale industry while committing to social equity."

By People's Daily Online

Feb 15, 2007 at 18:12 o\clock

From 66 percent to 90 percent

 
font size  ZoomIn ZoomOut    

The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change has issued an abstract report on its fourth assessment of climate change in Paris. The 21-page abstract shows that scientists agree that the surface temperature of the earth has increased by 0.74 degrees Celsius over the last 100 years. By 2100, the temperature will be 1.1 to 6.4 degrees higher on average than it was between 1980 and 1999. Over the last 50 years, 90 percent of climate change can be attributed to human use of fossil fuels while in its third report, issued in 2001, the IPCC estimated that only 60 percent of climate change was due to human activities.

From 66 percent to 90 percent - the number is worrying people, but even more people are worried about the Bush Administration's attitude. Less than four hours after the Paris abstract on Climate Change was released by the IPCC, the White House issued a statement saying that the US is not ready to take compulsory measures restricting the emission of green house gases.

This is not the first time that the Bush Administration has taken such a stance. In March 2001, the Bush administration refused to ratify the Kyoto Protocol using the excuse that a reduction in emissions would affect American economic development and that developing countries should also shoulder the responsibility of reducing and restricting green house gas. In July 2005, Bush said again that America would not sign any treaties relating to emission reductions because that would directly cause the loss of 5 million jobs in the US. He even claimed that there wasn't enough scientific evidence to prove global warming is related to emissions.

Global warming cannot be reversed and will become a more and more serious. Scientists say that although people feel that global warming is not too big a problem because oil prices are down and the cold weather is increasingly less severe (for example, people could pick mushrooms in Moscow suburbs in December and the grass was still green) but there will be disastrous consequences in the future that people will not be able to bear. For example, 10 million people will lack water, the glaciers at the north and south poles will melt, sea levels will rise, thunder storms, drought and heat waves will increase, biological links will be broken, and disease epidemics will spread. During the recent World Economic Forum in Geneva, the 2007 Global Risks report says one of the most severe challenges the world faces in the 21st century is climate change. The natural disasters caused by global warming will cause a large number of people to migrate, an energy shortage and political unrest.

To ensure human survival and sustainable development, people and nations should take measures to reduce green house gas emission. This is the rational and positive choice. In 1997, signatories to the UN Climate Change Framework Convention passed the famous Kyoto Protocol. Over the past 10 years, various countries have taken active measures to restrict emissions. However, the largest green house gas emission country, the US, still emits 25 percent of the world total. The US should shoulder its own obligations.

Climate change has no boundaries. Every country has its responsibilities. The US government's words and actions will only convince people that America only cares for wealth - it is rich but cruel.

By People's Daily Online