Which is better?
Just been thinking about relationships a lot recently. Not just my own either. It seems like everyone I know is having relationship problems at the moment. Sometimes I think we just get find problems because we get bored, we can't actually just accept that things are actually going well.
Is it better to have a firey up and downy kind of relationship, one that's very passionate, but not always good. Or is it better to be content, but risk getting bored?
The latter is kind of how things were with Richard, we got on so well, I loved him to to peices, but by the end we were more like best friends than anything else. The spark had gone, and hence we both fell in love with other people while we were together.
Beck (my crazy housemate) always has really firey relationships - neither her of her boyfriends can ever be trusted, and they argue constantly. But when it's good between them it's really good.
I am starting to doubt that anyone can stay in love forever. Is it really possible to stay with one person for years without just growing apart? Even people that are married for years and years - do they just kind of stay together out of habit?
Hmm, don't really know why I'm thinking about this today.
I am one of those people that will throw themselves into relationships whole-heartedly very quickly.I fall in love very easily and am a total romantic. I want to believe the fairy tale.
I think this might scare men off a bit. when I love someone I tell them all the time. I want to be with them a lot. I am really quite full on. But I dont see the point in playing games, I'm rubbish at playing hard to get.
But this does mean that I am kind of vulnerable when I fall in love, I get hurt easily, I'm terrified by how totally I have fallen in love this time. I really really dont think I could cope with having my heart broken by him.
On that happy note, I'm getting back to work.
Sorry if this has been really rambly, I am just writing as I think...
