THE LONDON BOMBINGS WERE A HOAX
Three weeks after the London bombings, the evidence is sufficient to warrant a firm conclusion: this was an inside job, a government-sanctioned operation carried out by MI5, most likely through a number of proxy organizations, including Visor Consulting. The most damning piece of evidence against the government is the testimony of one of the victims, dancer Bruce Lait, who, along with his dance partner Crystal Main, was nearest to the bomb when it exploded.
When he was being assisted out of the carriage, Lait recalls, "The policeman said 'mind that hole, that's where the bomb was'. The metal was pushed upwards as if the bomb was underneath the train. They seem to think the bomb was left in a bag, but I don't remember anybody being where the bomb was, or any bag," he said. (SOURCE)
Lait's evidence is a godsend for independent investigators, because he is virtually the only person who was near the location at which a bomb exploded who escaped with only minor injuries. This means that he alone is in a position to tell us what happened: there was no bag, no suspicious individual with a large rucksack.
Lait's account is not as detailed as I would like, but does make absolutely clear that the bombs had been placed underneath the train. The government, however, has been palming the public off with a completely fictitious story, according to which the bombs were carried on board the three trains and the Stagecoach bus by evil-minded members of the public - four young Muslims from northern England who allegedly carried explosives concealed inside large rucksacks.
But the allegations against the young Muslims are complete rubbish. Not a single allegation made against them has so far been proven to be true. As far as them being in London on July 7, there is no evidence they even made it as far as Luton station, the location at which they are supposed to have abandoned their cars and taken a train to London.
The CCTV image of the four alleged bombers entering Luton station at around 7.20am on July 7 is demonstrably fake. Fintan Dunne has found not just one, but as many as thirteen indications that the picture is essentially a Photoshop creation. (What's more the forger apparently signed his work, leaving the moniker "Ducky" in the bytes composing the image itself.)
The most devastating criticism concerns the individual with a white cap (allegedly Mohammed Sidique Khan). The bars behind this man can clearly be seen entering his own body - a physical impossibility. This is definitive proof that his image was sloppily incorporated into a picture that, for all we know, originally showed the entrance to Luton station and nothing else at all.
This is not all that's wrong with this photo. Blogger Irish Drifter has also raised some important points here and here. I would add the observation that the man in the dark cap who is supposed to be Lindsay Germaine has an ebony complexion - in other words, he's black. However,as authentic pictures show, Germaine had a swarthy (dark brown) complexion: his complexion should be a shade darker than Hasib Hussain's but certainly not Nubian black.
The second problem is the photo of Hasib Hussain entering Luton station which was allegedly taken a few seconds later. The problem with this photo is that it is so closely-cropped around Hussain's body that it looks like a deliberate attempt to suppress indications of whatever was immediately behind him, even though we should see at least one other 'bomber.' One has to wonder what we are not being allowed to see here. That the man immediately behind him was not Lindsay Germaine?
The third problem is the failure to release the crucial CCTV images, alleged footage of the four men at Kings Cross station at around 8.20 am. It cannot be by chance that the images which allegedly enabled police to identify the perpetrators of the bombings have quite inexplicably failed to materialize. This implies that either the footage does not exist at all, or that faking it has proven a much more difficult process than originally envisaged. If the footage actually exists and shows what the police say it shows there is no reason whatever for not releasing it. After all, without it it cannot even be proven that the four young men made it to London. If the men can't be placed at Kings Cross station on the morning of July 7, the chances are extremely remote that they had anything to do with the bombings at all.
It is important to point out here that although a considerable period of time has elapsed since the alleged bombers were all identified, not one single member of the travelling public has come forward to declare that they saw the bombers on the train from Luton to London, at Kings Cross station, or on any of the three trains and the one bus that were involved. I find this absolutely incredible, if indeed the official version of the bombings were true.
In any case, unless they were willing patsies, the four alleged bombers are irrelevant, because the bombs had placed underneath the trains. The bomb that exploded on board the Stagecoach bus may even have been placed under the seat. According to one report, the bomb exploded as soon as a male passenger sat down. That doesn't mean that he had a bomb with him, only that the seat was rigged to the bomb. All it took to set it off was someone to choose to sit in that particular seat.
To conclude, the theory that the London bombings were the work of four young Muslims from northern England is utter fiction. Since the bombs were underneath the trains, not carried on board by members of the public, the current frenzy to search passengers' bags is a pathetic attempt to make it look as if the authorities believe in their own lies.
In fact, if we really want to make ourselves safer from terrorist attacks on our public transportation systems, we need to heighten surveillance of bus and railway stations depots. Because someone seems to enjoy access to these locations who is in a position to load them with bombs with utter impunity - and not a damn thing is being done about it. That should have us all worried.
Oh, and this article will give you an idea just who that 'someone' might be.
NB: For excellent analysis of the London bombings, listen to the most recent radio programmes by Ralph Schoenemann and Mya Schone at this location. They can be downloaded or listened to in streaming audio.
When he was being assisted out of the carriage, Lait recalls, "The policeman said 'mind that hole, that's where the bomb was'. The metal was pushed upwards as if the bomb was underneath the train. They seem to think the bomb was left in a bag, but I don't remember anybody being where the bomb was, or any bag," he said. (SOURCE)
Lait's evidence is a godsend for independent investigators, because he is virtually the only person who was near the location at which a bomb exploded who escaped with only minor injuries. This means that he alone is in a position to tell us what happened: there was no bag, no suspicious individual with a large rucksack.
Lait's account is not as detailed as I would like, but does make absolutely clear that the bombs had been placed underneath the train. The government, however, has been palming the public off with a completely fictitious story, according to which the bombs were carried on board the three trains and the Stagecoach bus by evil-minded members of the public - four young Muslims from northern England who allegedly carried explosives concealed inside large rucksacks.
But the allegations against the young Muslims are complete rubbish. Not a single allegation made against them has so far been proven to be true. As far as them being in London on July 7, there is no evidence they even made it as far as Luton station, the location at which they are supposed to have abandoned their cars and taken a train to London.
The CCTV image of the four alleged bombers entering Luton station at around 7.20am on July 7 is demonstrably fake. Fintan Dunne has found not just one, but as many as thirteen indications that the picture is essentially a Photoshop creation. (What's more the forger apparently signed his work, leaving the moniker "Ducky" in the bytes composing the image itself.)
The most devastating criticism concerns the individual with a white cap (allegedly Mohammed Sidique Khan). The bars behind this man can clearly be seen entering his own body - a physical impossibility. This is definitive proof that his image was sloppily incorporated into a picture that, for all we know, originally showed the entrance to Luton station and nothing else at all.
This is not all that's wrong with this photo. Blogger Irish Drifter has also raised some important points here and here. I would add the observation that the man in the dark cap who is supposed to be Lindsay Germaine has an ebony complexion - in other words, he's black. However,as authentic pictures show, Germaine had a swarthy (dark brown) complexion: his complexion should be a shade darker than Hasib Hussain's but certainly not Nubian black.
The second problem is the photo of Hasib Hussain entering Luton station which was allegedly taken a few seconds later. The problem with this photo is that it is so closely-cropped around Hussain's body that it looks like a deliberate attempt to suppress indications of whatever was immediately behind him, even though we should see at least one other 'bomber.' One has to wonder what we are not being allowed to see here. That the man immediately behind him was not Lindsay Germaine?
The third problem is the failure to release the crucial CCTV images, alleged footage of the four men at Kings Cross station at around 8.20 am. It cannot be by chance that the images which allegedly enabled police to identify the perpetrators of the bombings have quite inexplicably failed to materialize. This implies that either the footage does not exist at all, or that faking it has proven a much more difficult process than originally envisaged. If the footage actually exists and shows what the police say it shows there is no reason whatever for not releasing it. After all, without it it cannot even be proven that the four young men made it to London. If the men can't be placed at Kings Cross station on the morning of July 7, the chances are extremely remote that they had anything to do with the bombings at all.
It is important to point out here that although a considerable period of time has elapsed since the alleged bombers were all identified, not one single member of the travelling public has come forward to declare that they saw the bombers on the train from Luton to London, at Kings Cross station, or on any of the three trains and the one bus that were involved. I find this absolutely incredible, if indeed the official version of the bombings were true.
In any case, unless they were willing patsies, the four alleged bombers are irrelevant, because the bombs had placed underneath the trains. The bomb that exploded on board the Stagecoach bus may even have been placed under the seat. According to one report, the bomb exploded as soon as a male passenger sat down. That doesn't mean that he had a bomb with him, only that the seat was rigged to the bomb. All it took to set it off was someone to choose to sit in that particular seat.
To conclude, the theory that the London bombings were the work of four young Muslims from northern England is utter fiction. Since the bombs were underneath the trains, not carried on board by members of the public, the current frenzy to search passengers' bags is a pathetic attempt to make it look as if the authorities believe in their own lies.
In fact, if we really want to make ourselves safer from terrorist attacks on our public transportation systems, we need to heighten surveillance of bus and railway stations depots. Because someone seems to enjoy access to these locations who is in a position to load them with bombs with utter impunity - and not a damn thing is being done about it. That should have us all worried.
Oh, and this article will give you an idea just who that 'someone' might be.
NB: For excellent analysis of the London bombings, listen to the most recent radio programmes by Ralph Schoenemann and Mya Schone at this location. They can be downloaded or listened to in streaming audio.
