If the campaignes carry on the same until election, Conservative majority ...... ndp don't count ..Whats a Party to do?
Sunday Jan 15 afternoon, go Steelers.
The Cons are running very well and can now. and should now expect a majority. With of course the Liberals keep imploding. Not failing to mention that the NDP will not count, on Laytons' course.
We have Harper who has learned to technically tell the truth, the Martins who countered with overt lie-ing, the NDP pleading that they should and deserve to be the 3rd Party.
Ok, what does the NDP have to do in the next week to shake and rattle voters to the NDP? Easy. Attack both Parties by making both of them scary and incompetent looking. How? How about a press release showing all the supporting documentation from this blog and from John Turmels' website which explains to 100 percent criminality at the High School level how Courts, Judges and Prosecuting Attorney's have created a law out of thin air unsurping Parliaments Right to only create laws. Courts can only strike down bad laws, not add to existing laws or previous Judges' decisions as they see fit.
All the info can be read and comprehended in 4 to 6 hours.
It can nail the existing to leading parties by explaining that it happened under the Liberals watch, that the Cons, the leading opposition with the most opposition resources did not accept it as it goes against everything they stand for, and that the NDP will stand up for Parliament only making laws while Courts ONLY strike down bad laws. Add on also that the Judges and Crown Prosecutors implicated will be severely dealt with with criminal charges. That here is the perfect example of the Cons using the Not Withstanding Clause. That the Liberals have finally proven that they can't even manage the Courts' Judges and Prosecutors, so there goes peoples' Rights protection at the wim of a Judges' bias. These Judges and Prosecutors who bring them to Court have to be removed to prevent innocent people from going through hell.
Please don't take any ques or info from Marc the Narc Emery or the lie-ing Alan Young the law teacher (see previous posts on this blog), or Alison Myrden who's IQ has to be sub 90 (determined by her lack of comprehension of the english language, even though her mother tongue is english .... go figure).
Its quite easy Jack,
to increase the flack.
Of all Parties,
to show their tardy.
Free of Jail?
Hey wheres the Bail?
The Judges in awe,
hey we can make up the law.
To nail who we desire,
of those who light our fire.
The undesirables we will decide.
Even though we will have to lie.
It will be our bias,
we will let that leads us.
Jack, you have to prove you count, not plead when your not counting.
cheers:) majere
ok, I don't proof read or spell check or grammer check. If ya can't get past a persons grammer to see the message, then your near sighted and need glasses.
The Cons are running very well and can now. and should now expect a majority. With of course the Liberals keep imploding. Not failing to mention that the NDP will not count, on Laytons' course.
We have Harper who has learned to technically tell the truth, the Martins who countered with overt lie-ing, the NDP pleading that they should and deserve to be the 3rd Party.
Ok, what does the NDP have to do in the next week to shake and rattle voters to the NDP? Easy. Attack both Parties by making both of them scary and incompetent looking. How? How about a press release showing all the supporting documentation from this blog and from John Turmels' website which explains to 100 percent criminality at the High School level how Courts, Judges and Prosecuting Attorney's have created a law out of thin air unsurping Parliaments Right to only create laws. Courts can only strike down bad laws, not add to existing laws or previous Judges' decisions as they see fit.
All the info can be read and comprehended in 4 to 6 hours.
It can nail the existing to leading parties by explaining that it happened under the Liberals watch, that the Cons, the leading opposition with the most opposition resources did not accept it as it goes against everything they stand for, and that the NDP will stand up for Parliament only making laws while Courts ONLY strike down bad laws. Add on also that the Judges and Crown Prosecutors implicated will be severely dealt with with criminal charges. That here is the perfect example of the Cons using the Not Withstanding Clause. That the Liberals have finally proven that they can't even manage the Courts' Judges and Prosecutors, so there goes peoples' Rights protection at the wim of a Judges' bias. These Judges and Prosecutors who bring them to Court have to be removed to prevent innocent people from going through hell.
Please don't take any ques or info from Marc the Narc Emery or the lie-ing Alan Young the law teacher (see previous posts on this blog), or Alison Myrden who's IQ has to be sub 90 (determined by her lack of comprehension of the english language, even though her mother tongue is english .... go figure).
Its quite easy Jack,
to increase the flack.
Of all Parties,
to show their tardy.
Free of Jail?
Hey wheres the Bail?
The Judges in awe,
hey we can make up the law.
To nail who we desire,
of those who light our fire.
The undesirables we will decide.
Even though we will have to lie.
It will be our bias,
we will let that leads us.
Jack, you have to prove you count, not plead when your not counting.
cheers:) majere
ok, I don't proof read or spell check or grammer check. If ya can't get past a persons grammer to see the message, then your near sighted and need glasses.
