The NDP must bring forth The entry just below this one shows that S. David Frankel losing Crown Prosecutor admits cannabis is legal to ensure voters turn to the NDP versus Cons as the Polls are now showing.
The NDP are still blowing it in the Polls. Voters are turning to the Cons. ooooh thats got to hurt.
The NDP have to attack the Cons with their lack of personal rights issues, MAINLY what I have written in this Blog.
The Cons must be attacked since it is a given that with the Courts having found cannabis legal (regardless of how the prohibitionist Crowns and Judges have been covering and lying), the Cons will be forced to use, and can be cornered on this issue, that they will admit using the "Not Withstanding Clause". The Cons unsurping personal soverign rights to suit their biases.
The NDP have to bring to light the Frankel Scandel to put the final death knell into the Libs and the Cons.
The NDP have to fight for personal freedom, the Courts have found a benign herb legal RvParker started it, then the Krieger Scandel, then the MMAR fiasco where the medical profession refuses to sign the forms therefore nullifying the re-criminalization brought on by Hitzig after the Parker ruling made cannabis laws as if they have never been written. (only Parliament can create laws, not the Courts....another Scandel but thats another story
The NDP have to stand up for rights first period. Then, and only then they can get in their "green" soundbites.
S. David Frankel, the Crown Prosecutor against Grant Krieger lost his prosecution case. The Crown Frankel in his Appeal Memo cited below that cannabis cultivation is now legal in Canada.
S. David Frankel did not inform the Regional Deputy Attorney Generals Office of this Criminal Code change as required by all prosecutors when the laws are changed by the Canadian Courts. The Deputy Attorney General is required to be informed by the Regional Offices throughout Canada, then required to then, inform ALL Regional Offices by immediately amending the Criminal Code and passing the amendments back to all Regional Offices.
Either S. David Frankel, Q.C. did not inform the Regional Deputy General Attorneys Office, or he did inform them.
The Regional Deputy General Attorneys Office did not inform the Deputy Attorney Generals Office, or they did inform them.
The Deputy Attorney General informed the Attorney General, or he did not.
The Attorney General of Canada informed his political superiors or he did not.
That is the chain of command laid out.
Who is negligent?
Now we have a Crown Attorney admitting that growing cannabis is legal in Canada wether by the ounce or by the truck load.
S. Davids next step, if he was negligent upon chosing not to inform "upwards", or if "upwards" said to just carry on with the Appeal, (as no Judge in his right mind would make cannabis legal) was to hope that the Crowns' Appeal will be accepted and of course overturned therefore sweeping the past legal time frame under the rug with no one the wiser. (makes sense to me if your trying to cover your butt over the biggest case lost ever)
So he submits his Appeal on behalf of Canada and what happens?
He loses.
The law states that if there is any confusion in a particular law, then that law must revert to as if it never existed to protect innocent Canadians.
Stand up for that also NDP.
(have to hit the publish button to save this while I get the other material to add)
The NDP have to attack the Cons with their lack of personal rights issues, MAINLY what I have written in this Blog.
The Cons must be attacked since it is a given that with the Courts having found cannabis legal (regardless of how the prohibitionist Crowns and Judges have been covering and lying), the Cons will be forced to use, and can be cornered on this issue, that they will admit using the "Not Withstanding Clause". The Cons unsurping personal soverign rights to suit their biases.
The NDP have to bring to light the Frankel Scandel to put the final death knell into the Libs and the Cons.
The NDP have to fight for personal freedom, the Courts have found a benign herb legal RvParker started it, then the Krieger Scandel, then the MMAR fiasco where the medical profession refuses to sign the forms therefore nullifying the re-criminalization brought on by Hitzig after the Parker ruling made cannabis laws as if they have never been written. (only Parliament can create laws, not the Courts....another Scandel but thats another story
The NDP have to stand up for rights first period. Then, and only then they can get in their "green" soundbites.
S. David Frankel, the Crown Prosecutor against Grant Krieger lost his prosecution case. The Crown Frankel in his Appeal Memo cited below that cannabis cultivation is now legal in Canada.
S. David Frankel did not inform the Regional Deputy Attorney Generals Office of this Criminal Code change as required by all prosecutors when the laws are changed by the Canadian Courts. The Deputy Attorney General is required to be informed by the Regional Offices throughout Canada, then required to then, inform ALL Regional Offices by immediately amending the Criminal Code and passing the amendments back to all Regional Offices.
Either S. David Frankel, Q.C. did not inform the Regional Deputy General Attorneys Office, or he did inform them.
The Regional Deputy General Attorneys Office did not inform the Deputy Attorney Generals Office, or they did inform them.
The Deputy Attorney General informed the Attorney General, or he did not.
The Attorney General of Canada informed his political superiors or he did not.
That is the chain of command laid out.
Who is negligent?
Now we have a Crown Attorney admitting that growing cannabis is legal in Canada wether by the ounce or by the truck load.
S. Davids next step, if he was negligent upon chosing not to inform "upwards", or if "upwards" said to just carry on with the Appeal, (as no Judge in his right mind would make cannabis legal) was to hope that the Crowns' Appeal will be accepted and of course overturned therefore sweeping the past legal time frame under the rug with no one the wiser. (makes sense to me if your trying to cover your butt over the biggest case lost ever)
So he submits his Appeal on behalf of Canada and what happens?
He loses.
The law states that if there is any confusion in a particular law, then that law must revert to as if it never existed to protect innocent Canadians.
Stand up for that also NDP.
(have to hit the publish button to save this while I get the other material to add)
