Majeres' Musings

May 31, 2005 at 18:41 o\clock

Some Religous Freedom talk going on lately

by: majere

There is nothing wrong with Politician having religous convictions.

Unless his religion is against the CANADIAN Charter of Rights and Freedoms.  Then, in my opinion it would be war.

If a Politicians religion is not in conflict of the Charter, then there can be no conflict to Canada and to the citizens of Canada.

If a Politicians religion is used to decide interpretations of the Charter which run contrary to ensuring that errors are always made on the side of "freedom, freedom of choice", then there is a religion conflict.  That Politician is then against Canada and its its citizens and should be immediatley removed.

Canadas' laws and Governance are such that it is the "negative" of Gods law that is used:  "do not do unto others as you would not have them do unto you".  In other words, its stay out of my business and I will stay out of yours.  No government or organization peering into my backyard or basement.  No nosy neighbours peering over my fence infringing on my soverignty.

Canadas' Social Security is based on the "positive" writing of Gods law:  "do unto others as you would have them do unto you".  In other words, if you see someone hurt you should ask them how can I help you.  If you are found down, you would want your government to ask you how can we help you.

Its not hard to understand the basis of Gods law without a particular religion getting into it, now is there?

The religous organization is either for Canada and all it represents as in the Charter OR NOT.

cheers :) majere


Log in to comment:

Attention: many blogigo features are only available to registered users. Register now without any obligations and get your free weblog!