Ok, no-one knows if its a majority or minority.
Sat 21 Jan evening muse.
A Con strong minority or one heck of a strong majority stemming from the Libs getting wiped out to the tune of several dozen seats. Hmmm
Jack Layton today not saying how effective he would be with a Con led Government, wether or not he would bring them down as soon as the first Bill arises that goes against NDP idealogy. If in effect it happens the first week, the first month, 1 year, Jack would just repeat his mantra of (omni-science of reading peoples minds) people know and want Parliament to work and we have proven in the past that we can make it work.
When Jack was pressed again about how the NDP and the Cons are at opposite ends of the idealogical spectrum and how could he keep such a Party in Power, Jack fell back again onto his old mantra.
So Jack might not gain as many seats as he is hoping,
people might again flock to the Libs from the NDP to slow down the Cons,
people deciding that they would rather have crooks in Power versus the possible losing of Rights,
just enough people to prevent the Cons from getting a majority?
How many sheeple out there that like jumping onto the winning bandwagon so they can pump up their shallow indecisive egos' to think and say of themselves that they are winners?
How about the Cons and Libs splitting the vote and the Bloc coming up the middle and gaining many more seats with not so much as a larger percentage of voters?
Marting pissing people off by constantly saying the word "fundamental" and "fundamentaly". Uuugggh. Not being able to string a co-herent sentance together.
I can hardly wait till Monday night.
Predict: Con minority due to the amount of people that are aware of their Rights.
cheers :) majere.
Will SES Polling once again be the most accurate of all Pollsters?
A Con strong minority or one heck of a strong majority stemming from the Libs getting wiped out to the tune of several dozen seats. Hmmm
Jack Layton today not saying how effective he would be with a Con led Government, wether or not he would bring them down as soon as the first Bill arises that goes against NDP idealogy. If in effect it happens the first week, the first month, 1 year, Jack would just repeat his mantra of (omni-science of reading peoples minds) people know and want Parliament to work and we have proven in the past that we can make it work.
When Jack was pressed again about how the NDP and the Cons are at opposite ends of the idealogical spectrum and how could he keep such a Party in Power, Jack fell back again onto his old mantra.
So Jack might not gain as many seats as he is hoping,
people might again flock to the Libs from the NDP to slow down the Cons,
people deciding that they would rather have crooks in Power versus the possible losing of Rights,
just enough people to prevent the Cons from getting a majority?
How many sheeple out there that like jumping onto the winning bandwagon so they can pump up their shallow indecisive egos' to think and say of themselves that they are winners?
How about the Cons and Libs splitting the vote and the Bloc coming up the middle and gaining many more seats with not so much as a larger percentage of voters?
Marting pissing people off by constantly saying the word "fundamental" and "fundamentaly". Uuugggh. Not being able to string a co-herent sentance together.
I can hardly wait till Monday night.
Predict: Con minority due to the amount of people that are aware of their Rights.
cheers :) majere.
Will SES Polling once again be the most accurate of all Pollsters?
