Monte Solberg misleads on land leasing ownership to his monte crew.
Leave it up to good young Monte to ply his play on words for slight misdirection towards a readers' subconscience.
A quote from his blog
quote>
It is important too that I actually own this land. Sure parks are great. We all support parks. But when I go to a park I just become even more determined to have my own private park where I can walk the dog in my pyjamas if I choose to (no I don't mean the dog is walking inside of my pyjamas).
I
just know that if I owned that wild swale it would only be a matter of
days before I could feed wolverines from my hand and befriend badgers
and ride on the backs of wayward elk. When you have a swale anything is
possible.
unquote<
Ok, it sounds rather harmless on the
outset. Now I take special notice of where he states, "that I
actually own this land", and "I just know that if I owned that wild
swale", that he is re-inforcing the Con Policy of Land Ownership.
Problem in truth here. You can't own land, only Lease it in the form of Property Taxes from the government.
I have to call this another one of Montes'
clever wording to the ignorant. Lets re-inforce land ownership
even though he knows its not true land ownership per se. At least
he makes it sound so, so cleverly..........not.
He must be preaching to his Monte Crew and the few gullible low IQ'd visistors that by chance visit his blog.
Good one Monte, delving into technical truth/lies re-inforcing whatever is the mainstream misconception in ones sub-conscience.
Property Rights, I want land ownership, not Land
Lease. Have the Municipalities raise their tax money based on
something other than land. It will only be when the government
has no means of removing one from ones land unless by a Jury of Ones
Peers that we will truly be free with land ownership.
cheers :) majere
i don't pick on the cons because i want to, i do it because they ask for it
the fibs are not saying anything and the ndp don't count
