Listening to Helena Guergis on CBC this morning
She, Helena, an MP for the Cons is waffling on an election call by the Cons.
Remember, Harper wants a majority, not a minority.
Harper would not be able to impliment any right wing policies otherwise.
Harper, would then have to deal with the Krieger Scandel which proves cannabis is legal and would not be able to re-criminalize it according to the latest Senate Findings of Facts, therefore alienating his biased right wing for future elections if his minority falls.
Layton of the NDP would, if they wait to pull the pin on the Krieger Scandel until the Cons have been in power for a while would then be able to associate the cover-up with the Cons as well. This of course would show their Party "corruptness" as well.
Then Layton would be able to come to the rescue of "personal rights".
What does Jack Layton want to do?
Stick up for Rights and "Bill" the Rich (rich meaning everyone) for his "green" policies?
Just stick to "green" policies which alienate them since he cannot explain how much it will cost me personally?
Or stick to Rights and then try to impliment his "green" policies?
PS Jack, most polution comes in from the States, you can't do anything for that.
PS Jack, affordable housiing? What are you going to do? Force landlords to reduce their rental charges by 25 percent? Who would pay for that?
STICK TO PERSONAL RIGHTS JACK AND QUIT USING THE GUILT TRIP OF USING, PITTING KIDS AGAINST GROWNUPS.
cheers :) majere
Remember, Harper wants a majority, not a minority.
Harper would not be able to impliment any right wing policies otherwise.
Harper, would then have to deal with the Krieger Scandel which proves cannabis is legal and would not be able to re-criminalize it according to the latest Senate Findings of Facts, therefore alienating his biased right wing for future elections if his minority falls.
Layton of the NDP would, if they wait to pull the pin on the Krieger Scandel until the Cons have been in power for a while would then be able to associate the cover-up with the Cons as well. This of course would show their Party "corruptness" as well.
Then Layton would be able to come to the rescue of "personal rights".
What does Jack Layton want to do?
Stick up for Rights and "Bill" the Rich (rich meaning everyone) for his "green" policies?
Just stick to "green" policies which alienate them since he cannot explain how much it will cost me personally?
Or stick to Rights and then try to impliment his "green" policies?
PS Jack, most polution comes in from the States, you can't do anything for that.
PS Jack, affordable housiing? What are you going to do? Force landlords to reduce their rental charges by 25 percent? Who would pay for that?
STICK TO PERSONAL RIGHTS JACK AND QUIT USING THE GUILT TRIP OF USING, PITTING KIDS AGAINST GROWNUPS.
cheers :) majere
