Conservative Party of Canada and Libertarian do not mix. None of the Parties represent Libertarian values.
First the definition of Libertarian.
2 entries found for libertarian. lib·er·tar·i·an
P Pronunciation Key (l
b
r-târ
-
n)
n.
[From liberty.]
lib
er·tar
i·an adj.
lib
er·tar
i·an·ism n.
Now the Cons believe in Small Government but will not explain how they will keep the same Services with fewer Public Servants to maintian them. We have all heard that corney phrase of trimming the fat etc. Some Cons might go so far as to say well if we transfer (sell off) a lot of Public Services to the Private Sector it will save money and make the Government smaller. My take on this is that you as in the Government can pay the Public Servants to run the Program or pay the Private Sector to run them as the Private Sector will be billing the Government. Or do they want the already overburdened Public to pay out of pocket? If they say we will give you more money with tax cuts, my question to them is will it make up for the difference exactly if not more, or will I be paying more out of pocket than I recieve in tax cuts? Would the Government then be saying that they cannot run their Government (Public Servants) to the same efficiency as some business owner? What does that say about the Governments inteligence level of management? It sucks right? So the Leaders cannot manage?
I await the Cons Policies to see how they will exactly impliment a smaller government. Until then, they cannot use the term Libertarian with Conservative unless its against.
The NDP always state big government. No NDP Libertarians what so ever.
The Liberals of course Lie. They will tell you straight to your face that they will cut the fat and turn around and tax you more and of course require even a larger government to impliment and run the higher/newer taxes and or Programs. No such thing as Liberal and Libertarian.
On to the Personal Rights.
The Cons before their last Policy Convention was stating that they will take away individual choices such as Same Sex Marriage, Abortion, and in general over-ride any Court Order that does not suit them and THEIR Policies. This by no means increases ones personal choices and increases ones level of Personal Soverignty. The Cons during their last Policy Convention made sure not to discuss and Policy Issues that would take away any choices, but they did not discuss any issues that increased ones choices. How they took a 180 degree turn and expect all to believe is not beyond my cerabal cortex. They in essence are trying to "look" different to as many electorate as they can. Whether or not they "think" different is where the "fear of a hidden agenda arises". Once and if they get elected in as a Majority, will they govern by their "looks" or by their "thoughts"?
The NDP and Libs make it so you have to fight their Lie-ing Crown Prosecutors and Judges in the Courts (shown and proven on some of the earlier entries on this blog) The crook of the problem is that it takes much time and money to fight to maintain and increase your Rights in the Lib and NDP Courts. So the NDP and Libs cannot be associated with the term Libertarian in a good way.
I am going to go out on a limb and say that Ontario by voting the Liberals is more Libertarian than the Cons voters in that the Ontario electorate believes that they can at least fight in the Courts for their Rights and have them upheld by the Liberals versus the Conservatives.
The NDP don't count.
cheers :) majere
roger m roeder kitchener ontario canada
a libertarian with WHO to vote for?
2 entries found for libertarian. lib·er·tar·i·an
P Pronunciation Key (ln.
- One who advocates maximizing individual rights and minimizing the role of the state.
- One who believes in free will.
[From liberty.]
lib
lib
libertarian
n : someone who believes the doctrine of free will [ant: necessitarian]
Now the Cons believe in Small Government but will not explain how they will keep the same Services with fewer Public Servants to maintian them. We have all heard that corney phrase of trimming the fat etc. Some Cons might go so far as to say well if we transfer (sell off) a lot of Public Services to the Private Sector it will save money and make the Government smaller. My take on this is that you as in the Government can pay the Public Servants to run the Program or pay the Private Sector to run them as the Private Sector will be billing the Government. Or do they want the already overburdened Public to pay out of pocket? If they say we will give you more money with tax cuts, my question to them is will it make up for the difference exactly if not more, or will I be paying more out of pocket than I recieve in tax cuts? Would the Government then be saying that they cannot run their Government (Public Servants) to the same efficiency as some business owner? What does that say about the Governments inteligence level of management? It sucks right? So the Leaders cannot manage?
I await the Cons Policies to see how they will exactly impliment a smaller government. Until then, they cannot use the term Libertarian with Conservative unless its against.
The NDP always state big government. No NDP Libertarians what so ever.
The Liberals of course Lie. They will tell you straight to your face that they will cut the fat and turn around and tax you more and of course require even a larger government to impliment and run the higher/newer taxes and or Programs. No such thing as Liberal and Libertarian.
On to the Personal Rights.
The Cons before their last Policy Convention was stating that they will take away individual choices such as Same Sex Marriage, Abortion, and in general over-ride any Court Order that does not suit them and THEIR Policies. This by no means increases ones personal choices and increases ones level of Personal Soverignty. The Cons during their last Policy Convention made sure not to discuss and Policy Issues that would take away any choices, but they did not discuss any issues that increased ones choices. How they took a 180 degree turn and expect all to believe is not beyond my cerabal cortex. They in essence are trying to "look" different to as many electorate as they can. Whether or not they "think" different is where the "fear of a hidden agenda arises". Once and if they get elected in as a Majority, will they govern by their "looks" or by their "thoughts"?
The NDP and Libs make it so you have to fight their Lie-ing Crown Prosecutors and Judges in the Courts (shown and proven on some of the earlier entries on this blog) The crook of the problem is that it takes much time and money to fight to maintain and increase your Rights in the Lib and NDP Courts. So the NDP and Libs cannot be associated with the term Libertarian in a good way.
I am going to go out on a limb and say that Ontario by voting the Liberals is more Libertarian than the Cons voters in that the Ontario electorate believes that they can at least fight in the Courts for their Rights and have them upheld by the Liberals versus the Conservatives.
The NDP don't count.
cheers :) majere
roger m roeder kitchener ontario canada
a libertarian with WHO to vote for?
