Aging Canadian Judges Conveniently Forgetting Nuremburg Laws.
There have been a number of Canadian Judges of late making decisions
where they are claiming that they are just following Orders from higher
up, as in higher up Court Orders.
Some Canadian Judges are actuallly using just a Superior Judges "opinion" to proscute versus as we all know in our democracy that Court Orders are signed by the Judge as that this is what this Canadian Court Orders.
An opinion with no Judges signature and a Buck fifty five will get you an extra-large at Tim Hortens.
An opinion with a Judges signature and a Buck fifty-five will still only get you an extra-large coffee.
Sound confusing? I hope not. Opinions from Judges or otherwise mean nothing from the Courts in Canada. It is only the Court Orders which represent the Courts Decisions.
With that being said, I am going to compile a list of Canadian Judges and Crown representatives who have used opinions and null and void laws to continue prosecutions, with proof as in some previous entries, while the Canadian government states by their lack of communication that they remain ignorant of whats going on in their Judiciary that they are responsible for. Irwin Cotler has stood up in Parliment stating (paraphrase) that the legislation as in place is what we are using for prosecution (un-paraphrase). His statement covered the base that if they are ignorant its due to someone not informing the governmnet Criminal Law Ammendments and Changes. Therefore we have the line drawn where the government will admit nothing until it has to, and when it does it will be, "oh what a surprise", to all government officials (sarcasim attached as I can prove through e-mails that all have been notified as in they have recieved the info, now if it is their policy to delete all incoming e-mail......well thats another public announcment that will go over well as one is thinking of dinosaurs; and just where did they end up?).
cheers:) majere
Some Canadian Judges are actuallly using just a Superior Judges "opinion" to proscute versus as we all know in our democracy that Court Orders are signed by the Judge as that this is what this Canadian Court Orders.
An opinion with no Judges signature and a Buck fifty five will get you an extra-large at Tim Hortens.
An opinion with a Judges signature and a Buck fifty-five will still only get you an extra-large coffee.
Sound confusing? I hope not. Opinions from Judges or otherwise mean nothing from the Courts in Canada. It is only the Court Orders which represent the Courts Decisions.
With that being said, I am going to compile a list of Canadian Judges and Crown representatives who have used opinions and null and void laws to continue prosecutions, with proof as in some previous entries, while the Canadian government states by their lack of communication that they remain ignorant of whats going on in their Judiciary that they are responsible for. Irwin Cotler has stood up in Parliment stating (paraphrase) that the legislation as in place is what we are using for prosecution (un-paraphrase). His statement covered the base that if they are ignorant its due to someone not informing the governmnet Criminal Law Ammendments and Changes. Therefore we have the line drawn where the government will admit nothing until it has to, and when it does it will be, "oh what a surprise", to all government officials (sarcasim attached as I can prove through e-mails that all have been notified as in they have recieved the info, now if it is their policy to delete all incoming e-mail......well thats another public announcment that will go over well as one is thinking of dinosaurs; and just where did they end up?).
cheers:) majere
