Majeres' Musings

Oct 14, 2007 at 19:33 o\clock

Harper misses the point when he asks for a mandate to govern.

by: majere

Stevie wants a mandate to govern after his Throne Speech.

A mandate means a blank cheque.  No compromise from Harper ever.

Well he has a lot of learning to do, especially controling his pettiness and anger issues.  His anger at juviniles, his anger at herbs, his pettiness towards the disadvantaged as they should just help themselves.......how out of touch with disablities can a guy get?

Harper thinks he is being clever with what he has done so far with dealing with the Libs with NO COMPROMISES.  Just look as to what I have written and it shows that he is just an average religous nutcase that can't seem to leave his morralitic bible at home when he goes to work.

Harper appears to believe that He knows whats right for Canadians, and if it pisses them off its their problem not his.  I am talking about allowing police to go on fishing expiditions doing their Knock and Talks to see if they can catch the homeowner doing "anything" illegal.  Like I said before, why doesn't Stevie just ask for everyones house keys to be kept at the local cop shop so they can walk in anytime.

Well it all boils down to respecting whatever is in my basement is my business, not hurting anyone.  What I have in my backyard growing does not hurt a single soul nor stops the neighbours from enjoying their property.

Compromise;  Stephen Harper can't.  His I am right ego is a charactor flaw that I would not want in a Prime Minister.

How is he to compromise on other issues?  I get it.  Only if they conform to his way of thinking and beliefs only.  

Some leadership, sarcasim.

I can only hope that the Libs get a majority just to rub it in Stephens' face.

cheers :) majere who compromises.

Oct 14, 2007 at 18:05 o\clock

Stephen Harper and John Manleys' Afghan appointment.

by: majere

Whats the Liberal problem???

The Libs forced the Cons to provide this inquiry (which means nothing but lip service anyways).

So the Libs should be celebrating that a Liberal John Manley was appointed after much Lib critisizing of the Cons Afghan policy.

Too bad the Liberals cannot enunciate the only strategy that would win in Afghanistan.

cheers :) majere

Oct 14, 2007 at 18:01 o\clock

Stephen Harpers' minority refuses common sense and chooses ignorance.

by: majere

Stephen Harper refuses to even come close to understanding Afghanistan Strategies, he chooses to remain ignorant.

The strategys' used is an American copy of Vietnam.  Too bad for the Canadians over there caught up patroling the same routes day and night, always losing the ground as soon as they leave.......Vietnam.

I already explained the tactics and strategys' reqd to secure the Country but Stevie choses to remain ignorant.

Just a recap from British History;

Completely surround every village, city, hamlet with soldiers.  People can come in but cannot leave.  Provide Medical, Dental, Food, Water, and infrastructure.  This means they are better off in these guarded zones.  AND yes, this requires many more thousands of troops.

The farmers should each have a full section of infantry with crew served weapons with a sniper team as well.  With the closness of farms other sections will be in line of site or the sniper team should be in line of sight between two farms that are not in line of site.  Provide food, med, dental, water to farmers family.

Everyone not approaching the towns and farms without hands up gets shot.

Too easy.

Harper does not want to know this.  He wants to keep the troops there to appease his ego and the American Right Wing Republicans.........the asshole.

Harper knows he cannot keep face if he withdraws the troops.  So he won't.  Instead its his sacrificing of our young men and women so Harper will not be ambarrassed on the World stage as if Canada actually contributes....... yea right.

There has to be an incompetance law suit in there somewhere against Harper.

cheers to all except the Cons :) majere 

 

 

Oct 14, 2007 at 14:15 o\clock

Stephen Harper fears 14 year old kids.

by: majere

Yes, Stephen Harper and the Conservative Party of Canada fears 14 year old kids.

Harpers' get tough on 14 year olds by putting them away for life (20 yrs) because they make a major mistake.

Now, Harper already supports boy soldiers and prosecution thereof as previously substantiated earlier.

Picture a 14 yr old just entering High School, socially awkward, hormones developing and trying to find ones way.  Us much older know that when we look back to when we were 14 we just knew the basics of right and wrong with no long term thinking.  We knew we did not know anything.

Harper fears 14 yr olds.  Perhaps because now a days they are not thinking like him, acting like him, have the same religous moralls as him, not Conservative like him.

Harper is 20 to 30 yrs behind the times using the American Right Wing Model, which of course is so backwards for Canada that the Liberals when they do gain power will probally take yrs to catch up to modern day.

Now picture a 14 yr old in the max security Kingston Pen.  Picture him or her getting out when they are 40 yrs old or so.  Picture that person pissed at Harper and the Cons.  Picture a 14 yr old learning that fear and intimidation is the only rule in life.

Harper, your a child abuser.

cheers :) majere 

Libby Davies why are you not investigating Grant Krieger?