Majeres' Musings

Feb 5, 2006 at 22:01 o\clock

Alison Myrden, Marc Emery.

by: majere

5 Feb, Super Bowl Sunday.

Got a Guestbook comment from Alison Myrden.

I have to assume she did not like my analysis of her and Marc Emerys' actions.

I ran a Google on each of their names and they did not come up in the first 10 pages in that they were not linked to my blog. 

Perhaps she Googled her name and patiently went through each page until she came across my blog..........bored?

Since she brought up her life I would like to comment on her LEAP (law enforcement against prohibition) affiliation/spokesperson.

First of all, associating cannabis with "laboratory chemical drugs" is a losing proposition.  Cops that want all drugs legal.  We know that will never happen.  Now we know there is a chance of cannabis becoming legal as it is a benign herb versus a lab produced drug.

Alison is backing a losing proposition.  Why I ask myself?  First of all, her backing Marc the Narc Emery who is going downhill of his own making no longer puts her in any spotlight.  Second, her NDP candidate run, well, the NDP just don't count.  Third, LEAP allows her to speak about legalizing Meth and Crack to get Cannabis Legalized.

Sounds absurd to me.  Lets get Crack and Meth legalized to get Cannabis legalized.

Oh wait, I remember Alison saying before something along the lines of lets get cannabis regulated for sick people.  I then have heard her support regulating Cannabis for non-sick people as well.  Now its "Against Prohibition for all Drugs".

I guess Alison just wants to somehow stay in the spotlight, jumping around which ever way the wind blows.

How about Krieger and Parker, Alison?  Ever speak truthfully on these two cases?  No you have not.

I have followed Marcs' case, Malmos' et al cases, and the many others. 

The only cases that are making progress is Parkers' latest, Noreen Evers', Turmels' and a family from Hamilton.  There are others I am sorry I have forgotten.  I have not heard you speak of these.

Your friend Alan Young has been proven by his own writing to be against certain people fighting for full legalization, against all legal ethics, he states that it is too complicated for ordinary people to understand and only super intelligent people like him know and understand the various legal depths (picture me playing puke on the socio-path).  Of course he wants lots of money to review and fight these so called new angles when one with simple High School can understand.........courts can't make laws.  Its funny how Alan Young told a Judge that She can create a law that was null and void as if it never existed, to charge a person, ruin their lives.  Almost every person in High School knows that only Parliament can create/modify laws and that Courts can only strike down laws.

I take it Alison that you finally realized what a liar he was/is and left his cheerleading squad for another loser, LEAPS?

Thats right, just to re-iterate, lets get Crack and Meth legalized so we can get Cannabis legalized.

I am not interfering with your life, I am just pointing out your public life.

cheers :) majere

marc emerys' self destruction is of his own legal ignorance accepting an ingnorant lawyers advice, buyer beware comes to mind

marc the narc emery pleading guilty instead of fighting for the legalization is in previous posts in this blog...........