Majeres' Musings

Sat 14 Jan .... evening.

When listening to politicians see how many times they say, "we need", or, "I think" when asked a question or trying to make a point.

I don't care what a lie-ing politician thinks or says what we need, I want to know what are the logical thought out specific actions, who must act these out, and what is the timeline that must take place to solve the problem in the question asked.

What is the Critical Path Method for said problem, in short.

If a politician can't answere in this manner, the politician is just plying towards your feelings.  The Fiberals and Martin especially is a political no answeres here but many words pro.

They don't have an answere.

cheers :) majere

the ndp never did count .........

Sat 14 Jan evening NFL, I want to see Doug Flutie play!!!!!

Ok, on to the Policy Platform.

"Enact a national drug strategy"

Right in the opening general statement I find, "The Liberals have put Canada on the road to drug legalization."

I see in this line the slippery slope fallacy disguising an outright lie trying to cause fear in the uninformed voter.  All other parties support CANNABIS (a benign herb according to the last two senate committees in which they recomend legalization) decriminalization. Get new glasses or contacts Stevie, its cannabis, not all drugs as you are implying in your statement.  But then again, you figured most people have heard about the Fiberals plans for cannabis so in your cleverness you decide to use the slippery slope fallacy (lie-ing) to instill fear, and of course associate it with the Fiberals, not all other parties including the Senate, just the Fiberals.

Also under drug strategy, "Under the Liberals, the number of marijuana grow-ops has increased dramatically".

Yes, with improvements to indoor garden lights and all the grow information one needs free on the net, coupled with more people falling off the EI rolls, can't get a job, and do not want to lose their 250 k plus house and savings.  I am sure I would consider the same thing if both spouses have to work and one loses their job with no chance of getting another one that pays the same.  Oh, I forgot Stevie, your an economist.  YOU KNOW the economy is ALL the Fiberals fault, 100 percent, no other outside influences ................... not.  Nice try though Stevie.  Don't forget that what I or any other knowledgable person would call a strictly personall indoor garden, in your ignorance you believe the Police who are on your side instilling fear.  And, technically, any amount grown can be called a grow op by you or the cops definition, so technically you can instill fear and not be technically lie-ing.  What about indoor gardeners growing prized flowers ........ same lights and fertilizers.  Are the cops going to show up to these houses dressed in HAZMAT gear?

Also under drug strategy the minimum sentance for grow- ops.  Like I said Stevie, grandma and grandpa growing using the sea-of-green technique which encompasses many small 1 foot plants versus the cops exagerated 2-3000 dollar plants (which is imposible anyway) would put the grandparents in the same cell as sex offenders and 14 year olds.  Just because they like cannabis tea with cannabis cookies.  I guess because they don't work hard, pay taxes and play by your rules they are not Canadians so who cares huh?

Your arrogance is showing ignorance Stevie.  You have learned well from the Fiberals over the last couple of years.

Cannabis is legal and I can hardly wait till till it is forceably proven in Court since no politician would admit it.  I know, it would kill any chance of re-election having cannabis legalized like turnips under their ''watch".  I can hardly wait to see the expression on your face, Bush an Co's. face and if you will allow the DEA from the States up here to help eradicate and fear monger so you can convince the populace at large to change the law.

Cannabis is harmfull because its illegal, it is not illegal because it is harmfull.

more later

cheers :) majere

13 Jan, 10 or so in the evening, nope, coming up to the witching hour here in Ontario.

"Stand up for Accountability".  Ok, I'll bite.  Accountability does not mean a legal formal charge of the Crimminal Code, it only means to Stevie that someone backs him up when he points his finger in the blame game.  No crime, but their are victims, no punishment as there is no crime ......... just victims...........

"Provide real protection for whistleblowers". .... "provided with adequate legal counsel"......"establish monetary rewards"....."save taxpayers dollars".    Yeehaa, I am going to be able to get me some canuk bucks.  Right after they pass this I will be on TV in front of the Duff Man with all the legal documentation with all the t's crossed on the Krieger/Frankel scandel.  The Cons must supply the lawyers free of charge for me, even though the documents speak to one hundred percent accuracy of crimminality.  Then the Cons can pay me for all the money saved in policing.  Those canuk bucks can be made out to me in a bank draft thanks.  Oh yea, for those who are not aware of the scandel that no politician, judge or lawyer wants to touch is that cannabis is legal in Canada.  Yes it is.  When an Alberta Supreme Court Judge says so seven times (approx) in his ruling, it must be true.  That tied in with the Crowns Appeal denied (keeping it legal) means that it is Canada wide.  It is not as some lawyers and judges have stated ...... that its only for the sick (I feel a cough coming on) or only for those in a wheelchair, or for those only that must use a cane or for any other wording or excuse to ignore the Alberta Supreme Court decision.  Ya can't touch this.  Ya can't touch this. Break it down....its Hammer time.....(funky disco rap from MC Hammer). 

Stevie would definately be wondering how in hell did that happen.  Time to pull out the Notwithstanding Clause because I like beer which destroys brain cells and I want you to drink beer too...... while cannabis increases brain white cells.  Maybe thats why I am smarter, not as shy, can speak publically and have a better personality than HIM.  Ok maybe not.  I am being sarcastic with some truth here.

Next;

"Real Tax Relief for Canadians".  Well I guess I am not considered a Canadian in Stevies eyes.  I wonder if his mom put his contacts in correctly for him...... one percent, one percent,  hmmmm, one dollar per hundred spent, hmmmmm, ten dollars per thousand spent on GST items.  Yup one to two thousand GST sounds like me so thats one percent, hmmmm, ten to twenty dollars per year, and thats if the proprietors do not raise their prices to grab that extra one percent.   Ok, Stevie gives all businesses a one percent increase on profits.  I guess I am not a Canadian, ok, I am born and raised to be hosed by Stevies tax relief.

Next;

"Stand Up for Security".  What a leading statement.  Does your dinking problems interfere with your work Stevie?
"mandatory minimum prison sentences" - "repeat offenders".  No I am not making this up.  I get caught shop-lifting popeye candy smokes (they are truly addictive) 3 times and I get a mandatory minimum in jail.  Seriously, read the sentance in the Platform as it is grammaricaly written.  Stevie has learned well from the Fiberals over the past couple of years, as in how to put the crowd in overcrowding (jails).  As in how to give your Construction company buddies work and boost the job figures just in time for next election (it takes time to build those thick concrete walls).  Hey, more population in Fiberal Ontario means more Jails, more of them in jail (Fiberal supporters), and best of all employment along with perhaps bringing some of your yankee doodle buddies up from the States to advise you on the type of jails and all that other cross border canuk bucks heading south (what a run-on with out getting to the point of Ontario loving you for the trade union employment).   Perhaps pull a cretin and go down there for a trip to see the jails and how they are run for yourself, and by chance drop in to see buddy bush over a few brain cell destroying beers.  ( I see a comercial here folks....bush and stevie having a beer on tv and the clincher is, is that the beer is from the east, schooner perhaps,  they will love ya for years).

While still under "Security". 

"Create a reverse onus - indictable firearms offence".  Ok, why not just go military law all the way and put reverse onus on all offences.  Howcome just part democracy and part military law.  If you stop the smuggling in of handguns like you say you will you will cut all gun crimes...by what was that number ...... you will cut it by 98 percent, since only 2 percent is committed by hand guns stolen from target shooters, which of course means that the military law reverse onus is truly bogus.  Now you can make the case of giving up some Rights to protect even if its just one Canadian.  Hey it could be you (fear).  bush and the patriot act are now coming to thought, yup bush said something along those lines.

"Strengthen the Youth Criminal Justice Act"

"Ensure - 14 years - or repeat offenses - adult sentencing".  Yes, I will be in jail with 14 year olds.  Wow, when they get out of Kingston as 20 somethings after mandatory minimums is served, they are going to be pissed, unemployable, pissed off, on welfare, pissed off at being poor, pissed, poor and on welfare.  Well time to get back to what was learned in con college, violence rules, intimidation rules, ok, back to crime in simpler terms.  Have to make money somehow.  If they get caught again, oh well, back to 3 squares and the only life known since the age of 14.

Rinse and Repeat.

I am having way to much fun with this policy.  More later.

cheers :) majere

the cons remove Rights on one hand and the Fiberals move tax money to their friends on the other hand

Fri Jan 13, evening.


What kind of subliminal shallow first year psych wannabe Phd. wrote the line about "Everyday Canadians" in Harpers' opening letter in HIS platform?  (HIS because I have been playing - where is Petey mmkay and many other memebers)

"Everyday Canadians - the hardworking people who pay their taxes and play by the rules - want and deserve a new government that will put the peoples interest ahead of self-interest."

How many Canadians out of 33 million don't work anymore due to disability or retirement?  I guess they are not "Everyday Canadians".  Ya never know, some retirees never had to lift a finger.......spouse worked only.  Dem dare disability folks walking around with canes and in wheelchairs are probally just fake-ing and proballllly won't vote anyway.

How many Canadians out of 33 million are too young to work anyway?  Well I guess they are not "Everyday Canadians".  Heck, they can't vote anyway but lets give them something to strive for ........like being an "Everyday Canadian" when they grow up.  Lets start brain-washing them now by saying that they are not part of the the hip-club called "Everyday Canadians".  Lets use any shred of developing patriotism against them to become like us.

How many Canadians don't pay taxes?  Guess they really don't count in Stevies' eyes as "Everyday Canadians".  Probally will vote NDP or Fiberal anyway.  Yea its coming, Stevie has been quoted in the past putting down people on "generous benefits".

How many Canadians perform their civic democratic duty to get bad laws nullified?  "play by the rules" (His Rules as He sees fit as the law maker of the land),   Well, I think that is why Stevie is wondering if he can cramm 3 to 4 people per one person jail cell instead of the now 2 to 3 people per jail cell.  Fill dem dare room with dem poles for doors with them yung wons of 14.  Don't forget to throw in grandma and grandpa for growing a benigne herb using the "sea of green" technique which puts them into Federal Jail territory.  Yea, grandma and grandpa are reeeeal criminals with their cannabis tea and cookies.  (do they get to share the same cell?  Adjoining perhaps?)

NOW, take away all these folks and you now have people ("Everyday Canadians"), who are, according to Stevie who is  reading ALL of their minds (omni-science) that they are wanting a new government that puts their interest behind the collective interest (communism or facism?)  "peoples interest ahead of self-interest".

Hey, yea its coming on like a bad "Daily Show blurb by John Stewart" except the punch line would have to come from a Shakespeare tradegy, and I can't think of any.

All I can think of is one word and the reason behind it ....... yup ..........hate.

The only reason a person "hates" is that what the person hates is "not like him".  The lack of acceptance to what is different to him and his beliefs.

Stevie has learned well over the past couple of years from the imploding Fiberals.

cheers :) majere

hopefully more parsing on his platform later...... the ndps' don't count.

Friday, 0106 hrs in the morning

Stevie did not wonder what went wrong last election for the Cons.  He knew.  Loose lips and considered non-mainstream policies.  The media did not help either.

Ok, everyone already knows this.

Recap this Con learned election.  No loose lips ala Randy White, no policies that are known to cater to the Bible Fundalmentalists, and guess what(?) the media is jumping on the winners bandwagon.

Go figure, eh.

Thats all it took.  Lie in general like the Fiberals.  Technical speak so technically your not lie-ing.  Promise meaningless-ly, ala 400 million for affordable houseing.  Sounds good to the average Canuk voter showing how much you care,  most voters who know its not for them and that it can be said that they do not know anything about affordable houseing and how it works anyway, eh.  Oh, it doesn't count because 400 million divided by a million dollars per six-plex equals 400 sixplexes times 6 families equals 2400 hundred families.  Ok, it sounds like a lot, but now divide that by say......10 provinces, and that equals 240 families per province.  Sorry Cons, but 240 or so families for lets say  just Toronto...........and area..........just doesn't cut it.

Harper has learned from the Fiberals.

"The poor do not pay taxes".  I beg to differ Stevie but the average Canuk is also un-informed in this area.  Working poeple above the welfare rate and below the poverty line do pay  income taxes.  So the line, "the poor do not pay taxes" is technically correct only if one is on welfare.  Good one Stevie, not lie-ing by a simple technicality.

oh yea, and the working poor buy next to nothing that has the GST on it..........

Harper has learned from the Fiberals.

Mandatory minimums for crimes committed by a hand gun.  Stevie playing the emotional versus rational card.  The general voter is emotionally directed towards handguns then sticking them with a get tough policy on hand-guns.  Good one Stevie.  Why do those crimminals get more than vicious rapes or pedophilia?  How come Stevie?  Oh yea, I remember, the voters right now have not been emotional driven in that area this election.  Oh, and most of those guns got across Our Border guards that you and the Fiberals are responsible for.  Yes, even you when you were sitting in Opposition.  I did not hear you complaining but only twice about the border guards......only when you had to.  Mandatory sentances for gun crimes do not stop the smuggling of hand guns.

Harper has learned from the Fiberals.

I gotta say it.

Its true.

I did not make this up.

cheers :) majere

the ndp and jack still do not count .......... really.  whats a voter to do?

Friday at 0010 in the morning eating perrogies.

First, the Charter and Constitution is the directive from the people of Canada which tells the elected officials how to run the country and the elected officials bounderies.

Get it?

The Charter is from the poeple, not from lawyering politicians.

It was the lawyering politicians that wanted the "Clause" in case they could not control the populace in general terms.  The politicians control escape valve would be to use the "Clause" to remove Charter Rights which enable more Parlimentary power over the populace.  Remember Bush and Co. (para phrase) you have to give up some Rights so we can protect you against those scary fearfull boogey men (terrorists).  In a nutshell of course, more power to the elected officials over us. 

Unfortunately, the tipping point for the populace at large to regain control of elected officials is long past.

Unless, the "Clause" is removed.  Good or Bad, Fearfull or Joy?

Fear from the Cons, a desperate move on the Libs part.  Politicians relinquishing a control valve. 

Fear from the Courts?  Sorry.  If a Canadian does not understand that Courts can only uphold laws and strike down bad ones.  Courts cannot make laws.  Only Parliament can create or modify laws.

Fear from the slippery slope that Courts could bring in a law such as abortion or Poligamy is a fallacy.  Courts do not make laws, remember?  Only Parliament can.

Courts can only strike down bad laws.   How this would lead to the lack of womens in general choice is a stretch of ignorance.  

Too bad there are many that lack the knowledge of their own Constitution and Charter.  Just think, a knowledgeable populace properly educated in our Countries educational system......now THAT would put fear into Politicians hearts.

cheers :) majere

Fri Jan 13, evening.


What kind of subliminal shallow first year psych wannabe Phd. wrote the line about "Everyday Canadians" in Harpers' opening letter in HIS platform?  (HIS because I have been playing - where is Petey mmkay and many other memebers)

"Everyday Canadians - the hardworking people who pay their taxes and play by the rules - want and deserve a new government that will put the peoples interest ahead of self-interest."

How many Canadians out of 33 million don't work anymore due to disability or retirement?  I guess they are not "Everyday Canadians".  Ya never know, some retirees never had to lift a finger.......spouse worked only.  Dem dare disability folks walking around with canes and in wheelchairs are probally just fake-ing and proballllly won't vote anyway.

How many Canadians out of 33 million are too young to work anyway?  Well I guess they are not "Everyday Canadians".  Heck, they can't vote anyway but lets give them something to strive for ........like being an "Everyday Canadian" when they grow up.  Lets start brain-washing them now by saying that they are not part of the the hip-club called "Everyday Canadians".  Lets use any shred of developing patriotism against them to become like us.

How many Canadians don't pay taxes?  Guess they really don't count in Stevies' eyes as "Everyday Canadians".  Probally will vote NDP or Fiberal anyway.  Yea its coming, Stevie has been quoted in the past putting down people on "generous benefits".

How many Canadians perform their civic democratic duty to get bad laws nullified?  "play by the rules" (His Rules as He sees fit as the law maker of the land),   Well, I think that is why Stevie is wondering if he can cramm 3 to 4 people per one person jail cell instead of the now 2 to 3 people per jail cell.  Fill dem dare room with dem poles for doors with them yung wons of 14.  Don't forget to throw in grandma and grandpa for growing a benigne herb using the "sea of green" technique which puts them into Federal Jail territory.  Yea, grandma and grandpa are reeeeal criminals with their cannabis tea and cookies.  (do they get to share the same cell?  Adjoining perhaps?)

NOW, take away all these folks and you now have people ("Everyday Canadians"), who are, according to Stevie who is  reading ALL of their minds (omni-science) that they are wanting a new government that puts their interest behind the collective interest (communism or facism?)  "peoples interest ahead of self-interest".

Hey, yea its coming on like a bad "Daily Show blurb by John Stewart" except the punch line would have to come from a Shakespeare tradegy, and I can't think of any.

All I can think of is one word and the reason behind it ....... yup ..........hate.

The only reason a person "hates" is that what the person hates is "not like him".  The lack of acceptance to what is different to him and his beliefs.

Stevie has learned well over the past couple of years from the imploding Fiberals.

cheers :) majere

hopefully more parsing on his platform later...... the ndps' don't count.