Majeres' Musings

Jan 29, 2006 at 23:03 o\clock

To me "extreme-ism" on both political ends must lie......

by: majere

Sunday eve 29 Jan.

I popped over to Kate at Small Dead Animals and read several links and coments.  They commented back and forth about Rabble and other way out Leftie sites.

To me, when one varies off of the mainstream general public consensus, one might find it easier to tell lies to get people off the mainstream to their fringe than to actually put up a convincing argument of facts.

I have noticed personally that people try to use the fallacies when no rational argument can be made to sway people to their fringe.

Look for fallacies when reading articles.  See if the level of fallacies used increases as one travels more off the mainstream, wether it is Leftie or Rightie.  Are they stating fallacies as facts.  Namecalling.  Making fun of other sites and other writers or bloggers?

Some people are so bent on their position and their desire to tell other people what is correct for the rest of the worlds' inhabitants that it borders on socio-pathy.  The vain attempt to control other people in a manner that "the one" sees fit.

The Main Stream Media (MSM) is taking many hits, my opinion, they deserve it.  They bring it on themselves.  How?  They allow politicians to speak what would be considered lies, allow politicians to dodge chosen questions.

My question to MSM is, "why the heck do you have politicians on that won't answere questions without lies or dodging"?

Ok, I know, the MSM won't get them on their show anymore if they have to answere questions and not get in their soundbites, eh?  Therefore no TV politics show, huh?  The politicians boycotting the politics shows that do no service to their cause.

Well, its about time the MSM put their foot down and sucked it up.  The media has to hold the politicians accountable.  Remember that word MSM?  Accountability?

Acountability to their viewers.

Regardless of the drole, unsexy, boring one hour politics show it might make.

The actuall asking of what engineered steps are taking place, the who is precisely doing what and which department.  The actual stating of which engineered steps have taken place so far.  NOT, "we have engineered concrete fundamental steps and the appropriate steps are taking place as we speak by those responsible in committee and will be positively implimenting these engineered steps when completed during our mandate".

See, an answere of complete bull, and the MSM lets it happen.

MSM accountability.

Use it or lose your jobs to the credable bloggers and internet tv.

cheers :)  majere

i have listed the common fallacies in a much earlier blog post and the ndp still do not count

Jan 28, 2006 at 07:20 o\clock

How can a decision on abortion be complex? huh Stephen Harper ?

by: majere

Jan 28 Sat.  Just after the witching hour ......

By Stevie saying that something simple is complex is a shallow  egos attempt to seem somewhat as a deep thinker among the ignorant followers.

Either one is against abortion entirely.  That one is simple for the KJV fundamentals.

Abortion only for medicall necessity as in rape or failed mis-carriage.  Medical is also an easy one.  Easy for the fundies and easy for the on demand types.

On demand only at hospitals but goddo pay yourself.

On demand, goddo pay yourself at clinics or hospitals.

Only at hospitals, government pays.

At clinics and hospitals, government pays.

Standard first tri-mester only.  Easy one unless medically necessary.  Unless the fundies come up with ultra-sounds of automatic nerve movement.  of course they would, they are agianst it.

There are only two options with several variations. 

Stevie, there is no molecular biology involved, nor chemistry or quantum physics with string theory.  There is no math involved for or against unless your a cheap son-of-gun biatch and don't want the government to pay for it.  There is nothing involved but a 1900 yr old book of mythology that you somehow determine how everyone else should live, albeit for politicians how everyone else should be controled, in the politicians best interest of course of course.

Stevie Harppie leading those of faith against those without faith.  Same set of morals Stevie.  One is not better than the other.  One should not control anothers body based on anything.

Oh I forgot, you beleive in a faith.  An unknown.  A not proven.  And this somehow gives you the entitlement to control others bodies

Politics and Religion stay seperated for a reason Stevie.  If you want to play your faith based game, how about Genesis 1:29:  Well Stevie, cannabis is a seed bearing plant.  Who or what gives YOU the Right to deny me something your god has given us?  The last time I checked, your not god.  Oh, don't try that poppy plant bull on me as it is not seed or fruit bearing and it has to be "man processed" anyway.  Cannabis can just be picked and put directly into tea or baked with, no "man processing and concentrating" as is required with poppies.

One more tip stevie harppie, every asthmatic I know uses cannabis to open up their bronchial passagewways.  Cannabis is not tobacco which is I am sure your "bad" association between two different items.  And yes, the asthmatics I know vapourize, no smoke, perfectly clear lungs and never had to use a puffer since.  Even the ones who smoke it as in cannabis, not tobacco, have perfectly clear lungs, no phlegm, no puffer use.

cheers :) majere

the ndp don't count, the libs are broke and leaderless and the con leaders' wisdom is lacking..............

Jan 26, 2006 at 21:14 o\clock

Libs only Leader is McKenna

by: majere

Jan 26, Thurs evening.

Yea its true.  Mckenna is the Libs golden boy.

Telegenic, yup.  Everyone else has unfortunately not inherited the telegenic genes from their parents.  As for girl who switch hits to the highest bidder .... she looks like a chipmunk, full cheeks  of petey' nuts that of wich the viewing public will tire quickly of.

Does not look like a balloon popped behind him all the time ...... like Manly, but thats telegenic genes for ya.

Does not sit up straight.  He's regular slightly slouching like almost everyone else who isn't annal about something as the fallacy of posture, well maybe grammarians fall in somewhere up there as well.

Soft spoken, I know girls who keep commenting on soft spoken voices that they and children seem to pay attention to and can listen to all day.

Doesn't lecture.  He actually talks as if your sitting around playing cards with him, and he is not faking, its really him.  For voice and lecturing combined see Bill Graham who maybe for these two reasons has decided not to run for the leadership.

Doesn't force smiles as bad as a "C" Budget Actor.  Ok, had to get that Harppy one in there.

Has proven to be ablt to work a room, Abassador, nuff said.

Does not call Yankee Land home.  Yea, that sp Ignietiff Harvard so far up Yankees butt transplant guy.

So what does this mean to me and the Cons, the Bloc and ndp don't count.

Word has been going around that Mckenna shall be annointed as Interim Leader as well as leading Leadership candidate.  This is good in case of a very quick snap election call, Mckenna at the helm.

The only serious question I have is, will Mckenna want to wade into the ole shit flinging match between the cretins and the martinis?  They keep hanging around without realizing it was time to head into the light and cross over to the other side us voters call real life.

A trivial question I will have to look up is, how much does the Opposition Leader make? -  and thats with the Parties' chip-ins estimated as well.

cheers :) majere

i would rather collect my disability and play poker to earn spending money .....no thanks ........  zero stress is priceless

Jan 26, 2006 at 20:37 o\clock

Bushy and Harppy are not happy with democracy .......... Hamas.

by: majere

Thurs evening 26 Jan.

I have to assume that since the Wall fell, China becoming the largest holder of Yankee Doodle Debt, and basically no other main contenders in the Yankees weight class, I guess they goddo go pick on a democracy now.

Bushy decided to associate;  a Countries peoples' majority of votes for Hamas with violence (think bushy and terrorism).  Now take the associated assumed future violence of Hamas to discount their peoples' democracy.

When did bushy, and today - Harppy, decide that democracy does not have to be respected?

I can only guess that some democracies are more equal than others.  Read into that that some democracies who are stronger will decide on "who is" ruling as democratic elected governments, not the people voting.

someone give bushy and bag of pretzels please

cheers :) majere

i wonder if stephen harper can drop names to bush to get them on the no fly list .....

Jan 26, 2006 at 20:21 o\clock

Early Today, my duh don and keith bloag

by: majere

26 Jan, Thurs evening

Earlier today my duh Don was talking with keith bloag about (para phrased of course) money for cities. 

Don stated right at the end that politicians like this because when election time comes around they like to say, hey it was us....give us your vote.

As soon as he started saying give us your vote, bloag got a worried look on his face and my duh don began to look very very sheepish and let the sentance trail off softly.

I guess they both think they were breaking some unwritten politico journalistic code, thou shalt not give away politico vote getting by guilt inducing, secrets.

I can't say "we" need more of this straight talk from our journalistic talking heads, but I can say "I" need more straight talking from our research journalistic talking heads.

cheers :) majere

Jan 25, 2006 at 23:35 o\clock

Border Guards with guns......good idea

by: majere

Wed, 25 Jan evening late, after WEEDS.

Having more Border Guards and giving them guns is a political distraction to the main pushed into the sub-conscience problem of smuggling.

Like I said, one extra Guard per shift per Crossing clear across Canada will only be able to check what? - one extra car out of every 40, 50......75?

Guns will not stop smuggling or even slow it down.  You cannot hire enough Guards financialy to slow smuggling down, let alone stop it.

So now the Cons get the gift of a Personal Protection for Border Guards pushing "smuggling" into the backs of minds.

How politicaly convenient.

cheers :) majere

the fibs are broke and the ndp don't count, 2 more conveniences to take advantage of

Jan 25, 2006 at 00:53 o\clock

Steven Harper won't say it, so I will ...........

by: majere

25 Jan Wed, during the witching hour ....a witching hour muse.

....... sorry Toronto.  The few hundred extra Border Guards stretched along several thousand miles checking maybe one extra vehicle out of every hundred or so will not stop the smuggling of guns into your City.

Sorry Toronto that mandatory minimums for gun crimes  have not made a dent.   Once one gun carrying crack head goes to jail another one just takes their place.

Sorry Toronto that you have to face kids getting good grades kicked out of school for repeatedly having cannabis tea before school, serving a "repeat" minimum sentance, then getting out of jail with no future, deciding to carry hand guns and sell crack and meth.

Sorry Toronto that you are just a big trouble sucking vortex like that found in a black hole at the center of the universe - wait, you are at the center of the universe - I believe even though that position  might conflict with my bible studies.

Sorry Toronto that I will not appologize for my chosen ignorance in dealing with hand gun crime.

I AM NOT SORRY Toronto that I will now double the minimum sentances that I have set for the Courts increasing to the approximation of murder.  After all a hand gun is just used for murder so the person carrying the hand gun will eventualy murder anyway, regardless if its just used for stealing a .29 cent box of popeye cigerettes by a 12 year old.

I AM NOT SORRY Toronto for spending several billion dollars to increase police surveillance in all urban areas looking for all the grandmas and grandpas with indoor gardens growing a benign herb.  After all, they just might be haveing YOUR grandparents over for a cup of cannabis tea that helps their osteo-arthritis, and no, they will not get adjoining cells in my brand new shiny super jails.

I AM NOT SORRY, oh wait, I think I am sorry, ahhh, no........let me think, maybe I am not sorry................yes I am, my advisors just told me...................... no wait...I am not sorry because my friend gw bush and co. says its ok and just gave me the thumbs up.........ahhhh just F-off Toronto......yours truly- play by my rules- vote Conservative- stevie harper and his harperettes.

cheers :) majere

Jan 24, 2006 at 20:15 o\clock

Monte, Monte, Monte Solberg.....simple, simple, simple.

by: majere

Tues, 24 Jan evening

Monte has a Freudian slip, a quote from his blog:

quote>

Think of it. Prime Minister Stephen Harper, an Albertan. How cool is that.

This isn't just a change of policy. More importantly its a complete change of culture.

Unquote<

A change of Policy huh.  The previous policies in place were advancing peoples' Rights.  I guess the Cons are going to be taking away peoples' Rights.  I dealt with some of the Con Policies in previous blog entries, and yes, they are limiting Rights.

A change of culture?  We are a Country of many diverse cultures.  Does this mean that they are for a singular culture, a culture patterned after a singular WASP perhaps?  Or is there a double meaning that he is hiding behind?  Ok, yes there is.  Everyone is jumping up and down with the famous, "culture of entitlement".  This is the misleading statement that he is portraying with no chance of whatever of a Freudian slip.  I guess us not-Canadians will have less entitlements then.  I know, he is talking about corruption not entitlements then.  Culture to entitlements to corruption.........monte, monte, monte,......simple, simple, simple.

I wonder how cleverly you will word the Budget if your the Fin Minister?

cheers :) majere

Jan 24, 2006 at 19:44 o\clock

Conservative Party of Canada Minority, oh where to begin?

by: majere

Tues Evening 24 Jan.

Observations

Con pundits today talking up Harpers' intelligence, how he learns from his mistakes, and how he is reaching out, BUT, he won't answere any questions until Thurs after his media briefing.  I have already explained these Harper/Con points away earlier.

NDP lie-ing to themselves and to any gullible public out there that they will hold the Cons accountable.  Laugh as the Bloc Heads hold the balance of power between the Libs and Cons.

The Libs, well, they will sputter and spit to put on a good show to the public, but support the Cons until at least Aug 2007.  The countdown begins.

Just remember that when someone is trying to sell something, that person usually brings up the opposite of the negatives.  I know strange but true in cases.  I can't remember the Term off the top of my head as I wrote about this trait months ago.  Note:  pundits selling Harper, pundits selling NDP no debt policy, NDP selling holding the Cons accountable.......the Libs actually being able to find a leader.... etc.

Ok, all this is simple stuff and almost everyone knows this just from watching the news lately anyway.

Next, a snip from a pro-Con site:

quote>
The jeers made me wonder if that process has already started. I blame Paul Martin for this. The attack ads, especially the group that included the "military ad", were intensely personal. They depicted Stephen Harper as duplicitous and without scruples, though without any real evidence. And in the last days of the election, Paul Martin constantly reminded people that "Stephen Harper's values are not Canada's values." What are Canada's values? Whatever the voters say they are, I think. That why we have elections, in part, to elect leadership that embodies the values a majority thinks are important today. To imply that Canada has one static set of values and that Stephen Harper and his supporters don't share them is to say Stephen Harper and his supporters aren't really Canadian.

Casting the enemy as the outsider, the foreigner, the alien, is the first step to convincing someone to hate the enemy.
unquote<

AHHHH, I think I have already shown below in previous posts that right in the Con Policy that Harper started calling people not-Canadians.  Ok, its too easy to pull some crap from a Con Blog, but I couldn't help myself as this is a prominent Con-Blog who appears rather angry.

more later

cheers :) majere

Jan 23, 2006 at 01:30 o\clock

Hippies Hate Harper........

by: majere

had to say it

nuff said.

:) majere

Jan 23, 2006 at 00:54 o\clock

SES is predicting a Con strong minority....

by: majere

22 Jan, Sun evening

SES has the Cons estimated at 140 seats.

To me, the majority of (us non-Canadians) in Stevies eyes (don't work Hard, don't play by His Rules, and those who Don't Pay Taxes) have spoken.

We want to test drive the Cons in a minority.  Am I making an idiot of myself for thinking, wasting my time thinking of a Con minority?  Nah, I am not wasting my time, since I don't work according to Stevie, and am on a so-Stevie-called generous disability pension, I have the time to waste.

Yes, Stevie will be very moderate, just Right of Centre.  Of course he will have to keep his Far Right underlings mouths shut until after the next election.  I know Stevie is pretty confident that he can control these people as he knows how and what they are thinking.  He has to prove during this test drive that he is not to be feared by another 5 or 6 percent of the population.  He will stress this during Caucus Meetings, as this silence will ensure a Majority Victory next election......patience my people.

Now lets switch over to the decimated Fiberals.  Heavy in debt we are told.  Cannot, and do not want an election for at least two years.  Have to have a Leadership race in which McKenna will win if he chooses. 

The Fiberals financial mess can be turned into a bankruptcy of sorts denying the Fiberals threat in a next election to the benefit of the other Parties.

Now, will the NDP see this as an opportunity to put the Fiberals out of the electorates mind for next election?  I don't think Jackies thaaaat intelligent to be able to engineer such a demise as convincing the other Parties to go for another early election.  After all, Jackie does not want to be seen as a bad guy, but, wants to be seen as some sort of Statesman.  So the NDP after picking some more seats will still be delegated by the voters to the back corner.....squeek squeek.

The Bloc sliding up the middle pick up a few more seats but with the same percentage as an under 50 percenter.  Gilles re-elected, working on increasing his pension for an earlier than expected retirement.  Gilles threat is no longer the Fibs, so he does not have to show any guts for an earlier election to financially ruin the Fiberals once and for all.

Back to Stevie and the Cons.  Stevie can't afford to look bad in the least, therefore no early election from him.  Hence no disolving the Fibs into a financial quagmire where only bankruptcy lawyers get any money.  Oh wait, there is no money.  What happens if every Fiberal Official just walks away and goes home?  Would anyone notice?

Now there are two questions.

Can Stevie keep his KJV fundies' quiet until a majority win, and then unleash their pent up vengfull fury?

Can Stevie keep his mouth shut and maintain his patience until a majority win?

cheers from a non-canadian-in-stevies'-eyes  :)  majere

the ndp will not count tomorrow .... squeek squeek.......someone step on that mouse

Jan 21, 2006 at 22:14 o\clock

Ok, no-one knows if its a majority or minority.

by: majere

Sat 21 Jan evening muse.

A Con strong minority or one heck of a strong majority stemming from the Libs getting wiped out to the tune of several dozen seats.  Hmmm

Jack Layton today not saying how effective he would be with a Con led Government, wether or not he would bring them down as soon as the first Bill arises that goes against NDP idealogy.  If in effect it happens the first week, the first month, 1 year, Jack would just repeat his mantra of (omni-science of reading peoples minds) people know and want Parliament to work and we have proven in the past that we can make it work.

When Jack was pressed again about how the NDP and the Cons are at opposite ends of the idealogical spectrum and how could he keep such a Party in Power, Jack fell back again onto his old mantra.

So Jack might not gain as many seats as he is hoping,
people might again flock to the Libs from the NDP to slow down the Cons,
people deciding that they would rather have crooks in Power versus the possible losing of Rights,
just enough people to prevent the Cons from getting a majority?

How many sheeple out there that like jumping onto the winning bandwagon so they can pump up their shallow indecisive egos' to think and say of themselves that they are winners?

How about the Cons and Libs splitting the vote and the Bloc coming up the middle and gaining many more seats with not so much as a larger percentage of voters?

Marting pissing people off by constantly saying the word "fundamental" and "fundamentaly".   Uuugggh.  Not being able to string a co-herent sentance together.

I can hardly wait till Monday night.

Predict:  Con minority due to the amount of people that are aware of their Rights.

cheers :) majere.

Will SES Polling once again be the most accurate of all Pollsters?

Jan 21, 2006 at 21:41 o\clock

CTV writes from thy writing.....I almost find in flatering.

by: majere

Saturday, 21 Jan, evening.

Its nice to see someone else pick up on what I have written several days afterwards, to me CTV counts more than CBC now.  You wouldn't have found this on CBC in any way shape or form.

A quote taken from an article on the CTV website;

Quote>

Harper has described his current party as having four main pillars: Red Tories, social conservatives, economic conservatives and reformers.

But, what kind of government will be created by such a mix?

"You'd need a crystal ball!" laughed Patten.

That being said, he adds that while Harper has promised he has no hidden agenda and doesn't want radical change, he may have no choice.

"There'll be all sorts of pressures for him to do something radical. There are members of his party who have been waiting a long time to undo Liberal and Progressive Conservative policies they disagree with," Patten said.

And while Harper assures Canadians there are a number of factors that would keep his government in check -- including a Liberal senate, Liberal courts and a civil service appointed by the Liberals -- that may not deter him.

"I believe Stephen Harper is the kind of person who would rather leave his mark on Canada than win two terms in a row," Patten said.

"If there's a majority, people should expect real change."

Unquote<

Taken from http://www.ctv.ca//servlet/ArticleNews/story/CTVNews/20060119/elxn_reform_tories2_060117/20060119?s_name=election2006&no_ads=


Hope this fits on this blog site.  Its still trial and error for me.


cheers :) majere


Jan 19, 2006 at 09:32 o\clock

Stephen Harper Conservative Party of Canada lied this morning

by: majere

Jan 19, 0930 after two coffees :)

Listening to Stevie talking in Waterdown, Ont. on CBC.

He stateed (paraphrased) that Martin has not distanced himself from Fuzzy Buzzy Hargrove who wants people in Quebec to vote for the Bloc instead of Cons.

Harper goes on to say that the Liberals will do anything to stay in Power.

What the Fxxzzzzzzk?

First, Harper knows he is going to be in Power.

Second, the Liberals are not in any type of Power position ( ALL Polls) at the moment or after the election.

Third, technically if the Libs have at least one seat, does this mean Power in Stevies' eyes?  His definition is warped to mislead the voters.

So Harper was lie-ing trying to make the Libs look even worse trying to associate the Libs to Power to Seperatist Bloc.

How miss-leading and lie-ing.

The Libs are not doing it to maintain Power (lie), they are doing it so that Harper is left to a minority.

Harpers' "technical lies" or "technical truths" are showing and all they do is mislead the peoples of this fine Country.

cheers :) majere

Jan 18, 2006 at 10:52 o\clock

Jack attacking the Libs, Harp makes a Freudian slip.

by: majere

Jan 18, morning coffee time

Jack attacking Libs who are closer to his left leaning tendencies is easy to explain.

One, Jacks' ego is demanding a much better showing for seats......a no brainer, duh.

Two, Jack willing to compromise his left leaning tendencies by compromising with the Cons to get things done in Parliament like last time, the peoples' broker.........Not.  Jack wants to FORCE the Cons without compromise.  That is why he wants more seats.  Too bad Jack does not realize he has very little say and it will not happen.  His ego escape valve is the fact that he got more seats.  Listen to his 15 second sound blurbs after the election is way over, we got more seats, we got more seats, repeat until next election.

Now on to Harper mentioning the Lib controled Courts, media, and civil service.  A nice Freudian slip allowing us a look into Stevies' psych.  A nightmare of Stevies', but wait.  Lets go one level deeper.  Harper by stating the Lib controled everything else is being stated now so he can use this as an excuse for later Policy implimitation failures.  When Harper cannot get one of his mandated policies passed to better Canadians, blame the Liberals.  Repeat until after the NEXT election.  Blame the Liberals even though Stevie has a majority?  Hah Hah.  Blame the Liberals if the Courts don't allow a Policy due to the Charter of Rights, Hah Hah.

Its an escape valve, an excuse set up prior to known failures.

Oh, Sandra Buckler on my duh Dons' show stateing they will not blame the civil service, that leaves stevies' dreaded showdown with his nightmare, the Courts.

cheers :) majere

Jan 17, 2006 at 23:24 o\clock

Trillium Ontario sucks right up until you get your file squared away......for me...over a year and counting

by: majere

Just a beef today.

Trillium, my first cheque for 1.99, yes just 1.99 came with a letter and a "Bill" for 600 plus dollars.

yup, Trillium.

Next, 5 months after the fact, they inform me that they are not paying for some of my medications because the doctor who prescribed them did not submit an obsolete form or instead, write a simple 3 number Limited Use Code on the original prescription.

Well the Pharmacy has been filling the script, they know the code and just put it into their database as being understood between them, the pharmacy and the fam doc.

I then submit the invoices to insurance, no problem.

I then submit copies to Trillium, 5 months later and 500 hundred owing.  Yes the meds run about 2500.00 per month.  I only make 2000 per month.  So Trillium says because there is no Limited Use which is up to the doctor only, not Trillium for approval, Trillium says we are not going to pay.

Fast forward, fam doc writes on script the code.  I sent Trillium a copy of script with code written on it.

If this does not straighten out the situ, well.............I now don't expect Trillium to backdate it for the last 5 months as being authorized and understood by all Parties involved.

I no Trillium will not accept this as an obvious backdate.

Time will tell if they have brains, no wait, they might have brains but have sub-standard IQ's to figure out this simplicity in administrative operating procedures with a "reading into legally" the backdate.

Somehow I picture a bunch of people working there (place profanity here) ssssloooooooowwwlllllyyyyyyyyy.

yea I am pissed at them for being broke the last week of every month, haveing to forgo my meds and eating just to pay for my wifes meds (without them she would die within a week).  My meds, I can last a long time without but takes months to recover afterwards.

Trillium, you suck until you get your shit together.
roger m roeder, kitchener ontario canada, you got my number.

Any more procedural harrassment 5 months after the fact and I will file an affidavit, forma pauperis of course so it only costs me 30 bucks and your lawyers a fortune as I can represent myself.  Of course all phone converstions shall be recorded.

cheers to all but trillium honest people, yes I have talked to some honest ones, but not to the ones who have lied to me or steered me in the wrong direction.

:)  majere.

the ndp with a strong con minority will be powerless beyond their own Hill Office entrance doors, oh, so they still don't count.

Jan 16, 2006 at 18:02 o\clock

Sandra Buckler lies, and an article with comments below.

by: majere

Mon Jan 16 early evening.

First Sandra Buckler lie-ing  stateing that the Cons Platform is still fully endorsed by that independant firm, Conference Board of Canada, even though the economist that did the costing has stated he has removed himself from it.

Now Sandra is trying to cover her and Stevens's ass.  The Duff Man is re-inforcing the Fibs talking head points on the issue, but not too hard.

Sandra is being rude, interupting all the time.  The Fiberal dude is not interupting and being polite.

In Sandras' arrogance she is calling the Fiberal a liar.  She must have big cahunas to actually believe the populace listening is going to believe her lie because she is from the moderate, tell the truth, clean up corruption party.  Its all over the news about the economist removing himself from the costing of the Cons Platform.  Fibs 1, Cons 0.
The Fibs actually telling the truth this time and the Cons lie-ing..... go figure.

now on to the good part, an article:

Toronto Star, page B3.
So, just what were they smoking?
So, just what were they smoking?
Candidates, crowd get in the spirit
Most at debate back legalizing pot
Jan. 16, 2006. 01:00 AM
RITA DALY
STAFF REPORTER
From the microphone came a question for the candidates that had nothing to do with health or education or the Constitution or guns: "Where do you stand on the legalization of marijuana?"

All seven candidates in the riding of Trinity-Spadina, seated at a long table at the front of the lecture hall at the Miles Nadal Jewish Community Centre on Bloor St. W. last week, smiled as the more than 300 residents in the packed room suddenly sat up with new interest.

So, legalizing pot, eh?

The first to answer was John Riddell, a white-haired gentleman running for the Canadian Action Party, whose day job is superintendent of a highrise. The audience hushed as he leaned back in his chair, looked upward and replied with a slight grin, "I don't think I'd have a problem with that."

Laughter. Cheers.

Next was Nick Lin, running for the Marxist-Leninist Party of Canada, making his fourth attempt for political office.

Clearing his throat, he replied, "I don't think it's appropriate for the state to interfere in individual lives."

The crowd went wild. "The Communist party? Holy cow!" someone in the second row exclaimed with glee.

Next up was the Liberals' Tony Ianno, defending his seat in the riding. He mentioned his support for his party's proposed decriminalization of marijuana, then added something about how pot would obviously become an alternative to drinking, so we'd have to figure out "how to ensure if people are smoking that they're driving safely."

People looked at each other aghast. Did we hear right? Things were certainly looking good.

Next was Asif Hossain, candidate for the Progressive Canadian Party and a student at the University of Toronto.

Hossain leaned forward and declared with a grin, "As the youngest candidate in the room, you might assume that I smoke all the time." Cheers, applause. "But I don't." That being said, he added that he believes in civil liberties, so bring it on.

More applause, hoots.

Suddenly, the mood in the room turned dark as Conservative candidate Sam Goldstein, seething in his seat, took his turn. Pointing a menacing finger at the crowd, he chastised them for wanting candidates to control gun crime in their city, while wanting to legalize a drug that was causing the gang warfare on their streets.

"You are supporting gang violence in this city!" he roared. The crowd erupted in anger, shaking their fists as he continued to vent his disgust.

The moderator banged on the podium to stop the commotion and finally the next candidate, the New Democratic Party's Olivia Chow, was able to speak.

"Well," she said. "I'm surprised it has taken so long and still nothing has been done."

More applause.

Finally, the seventh and final candidate was able to speak — Thom Chapman of the Green party, a young man who plays chess in his spare time.

The room waited in silence and then he said, "I'm sorry, I forgot the question."

He got the biggest laugh of all.
End Article<

Majere:  my comments on article.

Leave it up to the Cons to attempt to associate cannabis to gangs and shootings.  An Ontario Court Judge questioning a cops statement about how violent going into a grow-op house is ...... in 901 enters ....... only 2 small acts of violence.  Nuff said there.

The other politicians who are there on the streets know cannabis is passive.  That the cops claim even small personall grows as grow-ops.  Even the people in the audiance is fully informed enough to know that the association of cannabis to violence is next to nothing.  As stevie would probaly say, the audiance must have been stacked with not-Canadians.

The arrogance of a Con actually lecturing the audiance as if they are less informed, less intellegent and or less ............. Canadian.  That he, the Con, knows best.  That every single other politician and probaly by the sounds of the writing, most of the audiance does not know anything about cannabis.

Gangs deal in crack, meth and ecstasy.  Cannabis is very bulky compared to profit, when compared to tablets or crack.  The profit margin is higher in all other illegal areas than cannabis.  The Con member for that riding is a lie-ing joke of what we can expect with a majority.  A moral superiority with arrogance for icing.

Arrogance.

arrogance.

its starrrrrrrting.

cheers :) majere

the ndp shall be vacated as voters split

Jan 16, 2006 at 16:59 o\clock

Steven Harper Conservative Party of Canada , technically telling the truth or technically telling a lie?

by: majere

Mon Jan 16, afternoon....

I can't resist.  A quote from Harper below with my comments embedded.


Quote>
Early last month, Harper went a step farther. He pledged fealty not only to universal public health insurance but to the iconic Canada Health Act, the federal statute governing medicare." (majere: the setup line to get you roped in)

Any (reform) plan must comply with the principles of the Canada Health Act," Harper said. (majere:  as decided by the Provincial Supreme Courts when its in our favour such as the Quebec ruling the Health Act still applies with a private system)  "Anything less is the violation of a sacrosanct commitment that all governments have made to Canadians  (majere:  like I said, the escape valve is that Harpie knows the Courts will change the Act in his favour, so he can say he still complies).   We must treat all patients equally for essential health-care services (majere:  note all patients that are there for services, not ALL Canadians),  regardless of ability to pay Ñ anything less is un-Canadian (majere:  the patients in the health-care services cannot be charged, what about the remainder of Canadians?).   We must maintain a single-payer publicly funded health system Ñ anything less is untenable  (majere:  yes, keep a public system available for THOSE who are the patients, not all Canadians).  There will be no private, parallel system."  (majere:  there can be a priviate outside the system which is stating that its not parallel for the remainder of Canadians)
Unquote<

Ok, so we have a public system because its Canadian and a private system that is not parallel for those who choose. 

Don't forget, the Courts will be changing the Health Act in the Harpies favour.  He is going to play it by ear to get the not parallel system going.

Don't forget, if you don't believe in what he is saying and doing ........ your not a Canadian.

cheers :) majere

its pathetic seeing Jackie L begging for Fiberal votes, all jack had to do was listen btween my lines

Jan 16, 2006 at 05:30 o\clock

Steven Harper ....... change his stripes??? ....... I personally don't think so.

by: majere

Sun 15 Jan evening.

the grammer and spelling below should not be too bad, it is truth (hiding in a fictional writing)   :)

My take on Harpers' change from last election to this election has been partially explained in previous posts.  In my previous posts I basically say that he has learned to technically lie, keep his people within a gag bubble and only tell the people what they want to hear, in moderation of course.

Now my - "very brief"- take as to why he changed overtly but not covertly.

First, I read a little write up on his youth, a good starting point. 

With him admitted that he never fit in well on team sports, has asthma (I feel for him), and basically did the High School track team thing.  Move ahead a little to his studying of a soft science (economics) versus law, medicine, sciences or accounting.  His admitted to always looking into the crowd and observing people, not participating.  Move ahead to his angery outburts, having to be in control, moving to the NCC to get his views out into the public trying to prove his intellegence, back into politics when he thought he could win, sticking with politics now that he knows he is going to win.  An auther who wrote the article on his youth admits that he (Harper) thinks he is the smartest person in the room and enjoys people to, and whom challenge his views.

Ok, boring, doesn't mean anything yet.

For Stevie to admit he does not get along with others in team sports allows one to picture Stevie all alone in a room filled with books as an intellectual scholar as he desparately tries to portray versus the dis-associative type of personality of an intelectual scholar wannabe.  It tells me that his IQ is probally 105 to 108 but an EQ that is below normal. 

So just an average kid who did not fit in?  Why observe a crowd that you can't belong to?  Is it to dream of fitting in?--Nope, denotes lower intelligence of desire to be a part of the pack.  To observe the crowd hoping to find a way of fitting in and dreaming of leading the crowd and the joy that comes with it?--Nope, he already knows he doesn't fit in which means some of them don't like him, no chance of winning their hearts to lead them, but observe the crowd anyway. 

The crowd that has shunned him, a micro-cosim of society.  In simple terms a resentment forms, just a small one.  The kicker....... he goes to bed at night and day-dreams of proving that he is smarter than the crowd, to the crowd.  That he gets the last say.  That proving superiority is the best revenge, that I am right and you are wrong.  That I will prove I know whats better, better than you (the voters) do.  That my beliefs are right and if you are not the same as me you are wrong.  If you are wrong, you belong to that crowd that would not let me in.  I will prove I am more intelligent therefore my beliefs are more correct than yours.

His change over since the last election is what he slowly learned is what is required to win.  To win, unfortunately next with a minority government, (patience)  move slowly at first with moderate policies that can be supported.  Next election with a majority (the Fibs still in dissaray), I will be able to implement "my" policies quickly, then by the end of the mandate, the, "my intellegence based policies" will be proven correct. 

If you still don't agree, its ok, Stevie will make sure you feel and are seen as a minority that lacks the intellegence to offer anything constructive, just destructive to the country, "not a Canadian".  His revenge where he allows himself to gloat to himself at night when falling asleep.

Stevie will not care if he loses an election after a majority win.

He will have proven to himself that he is more intellegent than everyone else and that his majority dictated policies are the best for the country, and "his" policies get back at those that are not of likeness of him.

If I am not mistaken, he has discreditted the "people of the east" by saying they are not intellegent enough to get out of the culture of defeat, (or something along those lines).  He of course considers himself more intellegent than those people who in his mind choose to live there.

While in Alberta working for the NCC (I believe it is called),  he tried to prove his superiority over the rest of Canada by having Alberta build a fire wall around Alberta.  His anger demanded a revenge of superiority.

His known anger shows that he can not handle it when he looks like an uprepared fool, a lack of confidence stemming from being over his level of intellegence, things go wrong, he looks like an idiot, he gets angery.  His talking heads say he is just off on his own going through everything that happened, learning from it, then coming back stronger.

I say he is just plain ambarrassed because he looked like an idiot.  He cannot compartmentalize, neither can his buddy bush with an IQ of 92 (est by a university which estimates all presidents, + or - 5 points), but clinton can, (IQ est 172, or was that 152????).

I wonder if Stevie is going to give his buddy Bush a call and put me on the no fly list?  "His", a morally intellegent way of getting back at someone not like him.  The odd person might not be aware that an American auther, WASP, University professor,  who wrote an unflattering book about bush ended up on the no-fly list.

cheers :) majere

Jan 15, 2006 at 15:08 o\clock

If the campaignes carry on the same until election, Conservative majority ...... ndp don't count ..Whats a Party to do?

by: majere

Sunday Jan 15 afternoon, go Steelers.

The Cons are running very well and can now. and should now expect a majority.  With of course the Liberals keep imploding.  Not failing to mention that the NDP will not count, on Laytons' course.

We have Harper who has learned to technically tell the truth, the Martins who countered with overt lie-ing, the NDP pleading that they should and deserve to be the 3rd Party.

Ok, what does the NDP have to do in the next week to shake and rattle voters to the NDP?  Easy.  Attack both Parties by making both of them scary and incompetent looking.  How?  How about a press release showing all the supporting documentation from this blog and from John Turmels' website which explains to 100 percent criminality at the High School level how Courts, Judges and Prosecuting Attorney's have created a law out of thin air unsurping Parliaments Right to only create laws.  Courts can only strike down bad laws, not add to existing laws or previous Judges' decisions as they see fit.

All the info can be read and comprehended in 4 to 6 hours.

It can nail the existing to leading parties by explaining that it happened under the Liberals watch, that the Cons, the leading opposition with the most opposition resources did not accept it as it goes against everything they stand for, and that the NDP will stand up for Parliament only making laws while Courts ONLY strike down bad laws.  Add on also that the Judges and Crown Prosecutors implicated will be severely dealt with with criminal charges.  That here is the perfect example of the Cons using the Not Withstanding Clause.  That the Liberals have finally proven that they can't even manage the Courts' Judges and Prosecutors, so there goes peoples' Rights protection at the wim of a Judges' bias.  These Judges and Prosecutors who bring them to Court have to be removed to prevent innocent people from going through hell.

Please don't take any ques or info from Marc the Narc Emery or the lie-ing Alan Young the law teacher (see previous posts on this blog), or Alison Myrden who's IQ has to be sub 90 (determined by her lack of comprehension of the english language, even though her mother tongue is english .... go figure).

Its quite easy Jack,
to increase the flack.
Of all Parties,
to show their tardy.
Free of Jail?
Hey wheres the Bail?
The Judges in awe,
hey we can make up the law.
To nail who we desire,
of those who light our fire.
The undesirables we will decide.
Even though we will have to lie.
It will be our bias,
we will let that leads us.

Jack, you have to prove you count, not plead when your not counting.

cheers:) majere

ok, I don't proof read or spell check or grammer check.  If ya can't get past a persons grammer to see the message, then your near sighted and need glasses.