Majeres' Musings

Some say Harper has to come out with his Party Platform now and to start promoting it.

I am going to go out on a limb and muse:  why doesn't he ask people what they want and give it to them?

Start with showing compassion for the "left".  Policies that actually help such as increased CPP benefits as in cash on the barrel.  Or, also how about any person on CPP gets 100 dollars removed per month from their rent (apartment) or property taxes (house owner).  I know, I know, you state tax cuts.  Well tax cuts on CPP just won't cut it, as what .... say an extra 5 ibs of potatos worth per month, no thanks, that won't work.

Also with the "left".  How about removeing moped import restrictions, as in all restrictions so the working poor can afford some "mobility freedom", "freedom in choice of Public Transportation or Personal Transportation now as in mopeds.  See, the word "freedom" and ''choice" keep coming up?  "Freedom" only works when tied to concrete items - cheap imported mopeds, not just political buzz phrase lip service.
Think of the new business owners in Metro's importing cheap mopeds, more jobs.

Then move on to Quebec, which once Quebec gets their better UI benefits, it counters the Soveriegntists, does it not?  Would not that play out well as in trying to keep Canada together?  Try asking what else would they like, then try to accomodate them.  Think like your a Prime Minister negotiating trade deals etc.

Ontario, I have thought out many words on Ontario and the psy behind their votes.  In a nutshell,  more individual soverignty.  Harper listened to me a long time ago when I suggested they get the Chretian reciept (hastily written of course) and get the original to have the ink tested for degradation.  It was a nice try but Chretian would not give in and would only produce a copy.  I was "the commoner from the streets of the falls" back then.  Well Stephen, people are tapped out in major cities.  Make their lives easier by giving them more choices, easier movement, less restrictions, no fear as in changing the status quo, and get the cops out of raiding gardens that have cannabis in them.  (i had to get that in there somewhere)  Think of the wasted money and manpower that could be spent on reall crimes.  Remember the Senate Report that stated that it should be fully legal for the ages 14 and over, as in that is how harmless it acutally is.  How about 18 and over, as legal as turnips and put the money and manpower to appease your American buds on the Border.  Remember, if cannabis gets into the States, it passes the American Border Guards.  

Just read what I have written in the past posts.

The Prairies?  Here is where your lower Corp Taxes really come into play.  Incorp farmers.

BC?  They will have their "number one"  industry outed.  That will help them and remove the fear of the Jackboots busting into their personal gardens.  BC gives a collective sigh of relief, heard on every street.

Ok enough dreaming.

cheers  :)  majere

the ndp don't count Stephen.

Yes the Libs must be chuckling themselves to sleep at night.

In Gomery, all they could basically prove was, "he said, he said".

In the Grewal tapes, all they could prove was that politicians are skillfull at saying nothing but meaning different things to different people.  "Beating Around The Bush"

And they got elected because they speak how??????

It is this, no hard evidence as they say can mean to some that the presumed innocent Liberals remain innocent.

The Libs must have had to have taken some serious downers to get through the last several days so as not to be seen rolling around in the Halls pissing themselves they are laughing so hard.

cheers  :)  majere

PS:  the Conservatives tried really hard to show that the Libs will stoop to this level of political speak to not get caught, but I say it would have only have been good for a couple of days, not a couple of months or even a couple of weeks.  I know hindsights a bitch.

There is nothing wrong with Politician having religous convictions.

Unless his religion is against the CANADIAN Charter of Rights and Freedoms.  Then, in my opinion it would be war.

If a Politicians religion is not in conflict of the Charter, then there can be no conflict to Canada and to the citizens of Canada.

If a Politicians religion is used to decide interpretations of the Charter which run contrary to ensuring that errors are always made on the side of "freedom, freedom of choice", then there is a religion conflict.  That Politician is then against Canada and its its citizens and should be immediatley removed.

Canadas' laws and Governance are such that it is the "negative" of Gods law that is used:  "do not do unto others as you would not have them do unto you".  In other words, its stay out of my business and I will stay out of yours.  No government or organization peering into my backyard or basement.  No nosy neighbours peering over my fence infringing on my soverignty.

Canadas' Social Security is based on the "positive" writing of Gods law:  "do unto others as you would have them do unto you".  In other words, if you see someone hurt you should ask them how can I help you.  If you are found down, you would want your government to ask you how can we help you.

Its not hard to understand the basis of Gods law without a particular religion getting into it, now is there?

The religous organization is either for Canada and all it represents as in the Charter OR NOT.

cheers :) majere

sick again, maybe write something on the latest Krieger Supreme Court later tonight.

highly recomend reading

Kate at Small Dead Animals, link in my Favourites, has several excellant writings happenings with comments going on from a Western Political perspective.

Marc Paquette at Meppot has the largest collection of cannabis news, medical or otherwise with his Link also in my favourites.

cheers :)  majere