Majeres' Musings

A Motion of Confidence on Thursday changed to a Vote on the Budget Confidence Motion.

Whatever happened to the Opposition Day where the Opposition can bring in whatever Motion they wanted???

Jack in Question period this morning using fear, guilt and sympathy.

Jack used fear by stating that he is actually protecting "only some" pensions, as in business pensions.  This is, as if all workers should FEAR losing their pensions and we as in the NDP will "protect" you.  Just vote for us fear insitllers.  No mention as to how much they will increase CPP accross the board to the electorate though.  Another "just select a minority which hopefully the majority will "feel" its "them".

Jack used guilt and sympathy by quickly and not eloquently switching to clean air.  Paraphrased;  A mother brings her child into emergency because he can't breathe and Jack attributed this guilt/sympathy picture to clean air.  My question still is, " how are you going to force the Americans to pump in clean air along the Windsor Toronto corridor"?  Thats where most of comes from, right Jack??

The other two parties squared off..... same old.  Vote now is on the Budget versus Confidence on thursday.  The Liberals are playing word games with the word "confidence".

cheers  :)  majere

Mood: really crappy but smiling.
Listening to: Joey

The Cons and the Bloc represent the majority of Canadians, they don't want to play ball.

They are entitled to that since we voted all the Parties in the numbers they represent.

Therefore they are representing the majority of Canadians in Parliament.

So we can't complain.

If anyone does complain, then they may as well complain about the sun coming up every morning.  Same day different pile.

Oh, Don did excellant today controlling the Party spin and keeping the meisters on the issues.  I, and I am sure there were others out there that appreciated it.

Peeved at the NDP still supporting losers over a Budget that would never have been implimented anyway.  But Jack looks good and sincere, doesn't he?  Jamie H.  did a good job trying to talk about the poor and the environment.
Question for Jamie H.,  I am on Disability, "what does that EXACTLY MEAN TO ME PERSONALLY as far as the size of my disability cheque"????? 

Peeved at the Libs for peeing in the wind with "taking a day off with pay".  C'mon this is coming from mouths that use the term "the reality is" ad nauseum, puke.  You cannot tell someone else what they are experiencing ..... puke.

Peeved at the Cons for sticking to the issues and sounding like the only credible bunch considering they would take away peoples' Rights.  Read into it all the religous stuff you want.  Remember how some people say that the Gov should stay out of religion?  Well vice versa, religion; stay out of politics.

Peeved at the Bloc for sticking to the issues and sounding like the next only credible bunch but they want to break apart Canada.

Oh I like the way the Bloc representative stated that without Parliament on CPAC, english Canada will get to see more of the Gomery Inquiry, therefore be more aware of the corruption.  Got to agree with him.

The Green just suck .............. ndp one step removed at the moment.   Had to get that shot in there.

Looking at a Conservative Minority, a strong Minority where them and the Bloc will kick left leaning socialist butt all the way back to ..... where now is the closest place?? ????  Lets say Cuba.

Yup, Ontario, the butt of West and Eastern Liberal jokes, will vote in a strong conservative minority.

cheers  :)  majere

Aka, the Libs setting up a confidence vote win and you must respect it by not hounding us for the rest of our votes/voters mandate by keep bringing in more non-confidence votes after we win the one on the 19th.

Ho hum, thats not how it works.  Its a nice try though, linking respect with one vote to, and to infer,  that respect must be given without and throughout the remianing mandate utill we (Libs) decide when to call an election.

I don't think to many people will fall for it.  As seen in the past from Martin, it would just be another stalling technique till the "next" non-confidence vote arises.  That is of course if Martin and his libs win the upcoming one.

Nice elementary two moves ahead planning, but wrong planned move.

cheers still to all,  except those Veterans Affairs dxxxxoles  :)  majere

Mood: Will always be sick for the rest of my life.
Listening to: the House of Commons Question Period

Well the average age is 36(edit, somewhere on tv they said 35 but report says 36) for a militarily disabled member.

The main issue that is not being discussed is that it is damn hard to qualify with the military/veterans affairs board  fighting you at every turn. 

The Bill only addresses the ones that only have very stringently qualified right down to attributing the minimum 10 percent.

Those who have become disabled in the military and cannot prove it was militarily related (no witness, mental disorders due to stress, etc)

Good F'n Luck

You who have tried, know what I am talking about.

cheers to all,  except those who sit on the Boards  :)  majere

Harper said that until the government has its vote, it will get no co-operation from us.

If Martin is planning on having a vote and knowing so the government can have the vote today.

Martin will be able to use the queen as a prop

hope the health of some members improves or declines before the vote.

Harper actually looked and stated his position extremely well.  I would say he outspoke Martin, and out played Martin with the Queen prop potential use.

Gilles

Martin is not respecting last nights vote

Gilles says they are controlling, allways trying to gain time....wait for gomery, wait for next week, wait till after the queen, taking away "opposition days", always trying to gain time

All the MP's are here today so lets have a vote.

We are ready to co-operate. 

Gilles, vote now.

Why wait for the Queen???  Gilles says she has nothing to say about it anyway.

Gilles looks as good and is as well spoken as Harper, beating the heck out of Martins' attempt to paint Harper and Gilles into a corner.

cheers  :)  majere

Harper, whats there to say.

He is painted into a corner for May 19th.  If he comes out of the corner he looks like a bad scary dude unsurping "respect" and Parliamentary "obligations".

All clear in Washington now.  Got to keep the "Fear" in the News Media in front of the "people".  "this is not a drill"  Well, whatever keeps bush and co. in power eh?

Waiting for Harper now.

cheers  :)  majere

Mood: sick and still sipping green tea
Listening to: cbc news

So Martin saying that he is willing to work with Jack Layton to pass the budget.

He states that Martin is working with the Bloc.

Martin telling us to respect the vote.  Telling us, not asking us.  Arogant, he works for us, we are not there for him.

He is trying to tie into the vote results with "respect".  Works for some people I guess.

News interupted for another American Scare, run from the Capitol buildings.  Fear, Fear, rule by Fear.... Fear this....Fear that......vote for us and we will protect you from the Fear...... Let us pass Bills that remove even more of your Rights to protect you from the government spun Fear, Fear....  More Rights going, going,...gone.  Another Plane Scare.

I hope what the American government has is not contagious.


cheers  :)  majere

Mood: sick and sipping green tea
Listening to: cbc news....again and again...

Well which way to go, eh.


Decima: Lib 37% Con 28% Ndp 18% Blc 12%
Gregg Poll: Con 31% Lib 27% Ndp 20% Blc 14% Grn 7%

Polling details: This poll was conducted for CTV and The Globe and Mail by The Strategic Counsel. Telephone interviewing was conducted between May 2nd and May 8th, 2005. The weighted nation-wide sample is based on 1,000 which yields a margin of error of 3.1 per cent 19 times in 20. (Note: Proportions may not sum to 100 per cent due to rounding.)

The above para is for the "Gregg Poll", just to clarify.  Also note the dates of the Poll are between 2 May and 8 May which takes into account quite a bit of the Gomery Inquiry.

The Decima Poll, well it has credability and is probaly the most well known amongst the voters.

The conflicting above two Polls I hope can be put into perspective by looking at the swing vote rich Province of Ontario.  As I have thought before, it all boils down to Ontario.

Ontario Support taken from the CTV Gregg Poll

Cons  35
Libs    34
NDP   25
Green   7

So far with a few people parking their vote with the NDP I can't help but wonder if they are just increasing their votes in their already won ridings?

A Conservative Minority,  No wait, A Liberal Minority,

Actually I am thinking that Ontario will get peeved off at being the butt of jokes voting for a corrupt government and switch en masse to the Cons. 

I am going to go with another Lib minority so far as Ontario will not want to be told how to vote by the Rest of Canada.  Kind of a "screw you" type of thing.  That Ontario will vote in a Lib minority, again.

I can see why the Blocs' Gilles attacked the NDP as the NDP in Quebec are at 11 percent with the Libs sitting at 16 percent in Quebec.

The NDP overall still don't count as they still don't get it as a 4th "fringe" Party.
Yes I am thinking that they are now just a Liberal Fringe that is bent on Socialist Greenery regardless of the election outcome.  Regardless of everything else they say, its the very pissed off at the rich poor....... as Jack and his wife sip champagne of course.

I have almost given up on the NDP introducing publicly the Frankel/Krieger/Parker Scandal.  That the Party is just there for someone who is just peeved at the rest.

Another Lib minority will swell Martins head, as if it can get any bigger eh, and it will justify in his mind the "buying of votes works", that "saying one thing and doing another still works", and that "deny, deny, even if its the truth still works".

A Con Minority would bring the Harperites into the gladiators octagon with little training and will quickly be humbled into center left big spending policies, or be told.

Either way none would last with a small minority.

A large minority of the Libs/NDP, which is what Jack is secretly hoping for so he can be a public power broker to the poor, will last.

A large minority of the Cons/Bloc, would last.

Either way a large minority win for the two groups would result in a lot of name calling, but policies would get passed, whether we like them or not.

cheers :)  majere

Mood: really sick, not of this, just really sick.
Listening to: My more intelligent Don and his collegues.

Well Harper, give him credit for trying.  He gets about an "A" to a "B+".

The Cons and Bloc win 153 to 150 votes.

Harper challenging Martin to stand up and ask for a Confidence Vote .....if he has it, Confidence of the House that is ..... as in the balls to do it....how is that for a turn around?

Speaker immediately says its not a "point of order".  He gained control pretty quickly.

The libs are saying that Harper does not know what he is doing and saying and the libs are staying in power.

Gille, leader of the Bloc......each vote of the Bloc is a vote of non confidence....take that libs.

The Speaker now brings up that its time for business motions(?) etc.

Sooooo Harper outside the House.....corrupt party, ignoring democratic will of Parliament, no moral authortiy to govern....no constitutional authority to govern, Martin going from desperate to dangerous, ruining this countries finances....Martin refusing to get the confidence of the House after losing the vote.....

Soooo whats Harpers other plans?????  If any, since the Budget vote(s) will be coming up soon.  Harper got cornered into action, he will come up with something good tomorrow, and the next day, and the next day after that, and the next .....

Gille outside the house.....desperately hanging on to power .......discredited itself week in and week out.....studing this this evening....the gov is crippeled....the ndp voted for someone who is corrupt...the ndp is scared of an election....empty chairs is bad policy as far as what to do next.....May 18th vote coming up....gilles duceppe will not show or tell his strategy over the next little while. 

So Gilles has more plans, usually he is pretty straight forward with nothing to hide.  I might find this interesting about Gilles, but I don't.  He is a one trick pony, seperatist, thorn in any governments side, so he does not really have anything else but attack the NDP.

The libs seen this as a procedural motion only.  Apparently, so did the Speaker of the House.

The pundits are saying that we should see how this plays out over the next couple of days.

The pundits say the voters do not want an election....I beg to differ.  Each Parties Very Faithfull  SHALL  come out to vote.

Oh yea, the NDP voted for the corrupt Libs.  How many mistakes can a Leader of a Party make and still remain Leader?  Until he his telegenic good looks disappears or what????  I don't get it.  Jack has got to go back to Toronto Politcs, if he still can after this.

Oh wait, Jack can get the Frankel scandal out and restore my Court given Rights IN PUBLIC, OUT IN THE PUBLIC, HAVE PEOPLE IMPLICATED CHARGED, ETC ETC ETC...    That is the only way to redeem yourself now Jack, backed into a corner now you have to go out on a limb.

cheers  :)  majere
roger m roeder  a "libertarian socialist conservative bent on seperation" as in more Rights for Individuals.

Mood: crappy, getting sicker
Listening to: a smarter don

So far a mic glitch........western technology eh.  Nothing to be ambarrassed about Don.

Rehashed Gomery Witnesses....ok...still bad for the Libs.  Maybe....hmmm that is why Martin is staaaaallllllling as planning to use the budget (Libs) versus Gomery Inquiry (Cons).  That 2 weeks is a long time in Politics to spin whatever out of the electorates mind.

Oh yea, the NDP who don't listen to theeeee........well they still don't count until they do some very basic Judicial homework that a High School student could follow, understand and do.  (see remainder of blog for most info or where to get it)

The Bloc, yup, always straight to the point.  No Party Buzzword/Phrases required.

Talking about Confidence Votes in Parliament with some ex-party org(?) leaders.
Don summed up greatly and Axworthy does not like Dons' summation.  Axworthy could not admit that the government is planning to fail on their budget without caveats that Harper is crazy etc.

Anderson is saying that no leader can "fold" (give in).  So Harper has lost control and must play this out.

Don explaining that a leading Poll driven Harper made a mistake and Axworthy agreed.  Harpers rush to judgement was a mistake regarding Gomery, as the Inquiry is now ho hum....  Harper overcomitting himself.  Good one Anderson.

Axworthy explaining quite well about how the Libs should have played out their minority budget.  Play up to each parties main thrust and see who bites.  But with the present budget it was only the NDP who bit as the Libs really did not play up to the Blocs UI major elective plan or the Cons main Corp Tax Cut elective plan.

A couple of CBC collegues Boag and Bonner with Don explaining the upcoming vote and how the two independants that can make it are voting for the Libs.

Number crunching with Don Newman.........150 to 153.  For a government Lib loss.  Boag says that the Libs can just say, " so what".  Why are the Libs showing up????

A confidence vote will eventually take place.

Its the Libs that chose the days that it can be brought up.

Oh well, its the only thing that the Libs seem to be able to control....

cheers  :)  majere

Don did excellant controlling the pundits.

Cons did well explaining the extra billions (est 22 billion) and how this is to stop the reckless spending since Martins Sad I am Sorry Speech.

Libs did poor fending off the Cons, I can't believe how much Susan can dodge and weave around issues...... sad really as it was sooooooo transparent.

Ndp talked about smog (you can't stop it from coming in from the States.....NDP idiots)
NDP talked this is about smog and passing the budget and this will not (the NDP portion)will not put the Budget into a deficet.  NDP guy sounded like a political broken record, smog..housing...better planning for people????? People able to better plan?????........how????? 

Oh yea, the NDP guy mentioned so many people died from smog.  BUT he did not say if they had pre-existing conditions,  age, and any other of the usually argumentative fallacies that could be used to disect a study based statement.  Did not bring one tear to the house.

Well done this morning Don getting out everyones real position, except the Libs and NDP broken political record skipping over the issues to buzzwords/phrases.

In other words..... the Cons did very well this morning fending their positions and had everyone else on the defensive.

cheers  :)  majere

Mood: sick and rambling,
Listening to: rehashed CBC news

The voters of Ontario will still decide to side with NOT having their neighbours tell them how to live, who to live with, what they can and cannot grow and consume IN THEIR OWN BACKYARD.  Therefore NO CONSERVATIVES.

The voters of Ontario will still decide to side with the neighbours that they will have to WATCH A LITTLE CLOSER LEST THEY CATCH THEM STEALING AGAIN.  Therefore NO CONSERVATIVES.

So Ontario goes.

The Conservatives still have not removed their stigma of 'control' over ones Rights as to finding ways of  protecting and increasing ones Rights within society.

At least with the Libs one does not have the fear of  the potential use of the "Not Withstanding Clause" to overturn a Right that a neighbour does not want you to have.  With the Cons one does have to worry about the "use" and have the neighbours decide what Rights you should have.

At least with the Libs, you can fight any erosion of Rights in the Courts (as of late that is not the case as the Judges and Crowns are taking it upon themselves to enforce their morals on their judgements ie Frankel/Krieger/Parker) but the fights in the Courts is still allowed to continue.  With the Cons, one cannot fight to counter a "use" of the "Not Withstanding Clause" in the Courts.

The NDP..........hear that sound..........declining Poll numbers.......
The NDP say "people first".  Sorry Jack, like I said before, your not proving anything.

Jack, your so-called multi-year budget deal........people see right through that salemanship technique.  The "people first" voters of Ontario know better in that it would not be implimented anyway, therefore you cannot be trusted by the "people first" voters of Ontario.

The "people first" voters of Ontario see you increasing Corp Taxes which will chase away their employers............and they know that this will increase the unemployed and welfare victims that will be distraught enough to throw their vote your way as a protector of the poor.

A self made NDP voter making machine.

Make gas tax increases to force the barely "able" to forgo their required to get to their doctors not on the busline without adequate seating for disabled who must lay down to get there not able to afford to go to their doctors anymore.  But wait, more potential NDP pissed off poor voters blaming the NDP directed blame game at the "gas refineries".

Jack, as much as I would like to see you "really put People first", your not.

So the Libs still get the Ontario vote.

Jack, a camera friendly face can only get you so far.
Jack, a leader is to lead with "actions(judicial scandel paperwork)" and words.
Jack, no longer a leader? (another muse)
Jack, Personal Rights.
Jack, Personal Rights, with proof.

There, I added a little more to the last statement to help your little Party out.....with proof.

cheers  :)  majere
roger m roeder

Jack does not have my back,
he can't even get my Rights back.
He cannot lead
by words alone.
Only his actions can atone,
for the poor show,
of the latest Poll.

Mood: very sick and tired....... :(
Listening to: the discovery channel, russian boomer sub

You have to prove it Jack.

You don't prove it by making side deals payable up to 5 yrs down the road for only some parts of the Country or for some select groups of people here.

You do it by proving the Judiciary is unsurping Peoples' Rights and that it has the effect of ALL People when the Courts run contrary to the Countries Consititution....the Constitution effects everyone.

Think Jack, the Judiciary running amok, the Crown actually using the Hitzig case to declare a law,  "as if it was never written",  is somehow back to life....only Parliament can create laws Jack, not the Courts.

Frankel memo with Krieger and Parker decision.

Go next door to the Supreme Court and get a photo copy of the signed Frankel/Krieger memo where he states that cannabis is legal.  Then look at the final Krieger SCC Order where it mentions cannabis is legal.  Then check the Criminal Code for ammendments Jack.  Guess what........there was none.....why?  No one can explain it.  Lawyers and Judges dodge and weave around it.  Over 4000 people got off on charges because of it Jack.  When there is confusion in a law,  the law is automatically declared null and void as a Canadian cannot be put into confusion over a law.

How easy can I make it for you Jack, Libby, Ed....etc......

cheers :)  majere

Happy Mothers Day Mom.

roger

Mood: sick...trying to figure out what I did yesterday
Listening to: Canadian news overblowing VE day for about the 4th straight day

The NDP still DON'T GET IT

The Cons still TRYING TO FIND IT

The Libs still TRYING TO HOLD ON

The Bloc still KNOW EXACTIMENT (SP)

Ontario still the deciding factor whcih can only be influenced by the NDP coming out with the "Personall Rights Issue"  of  the Frankel/Krieger/Parker Judicial Scandel...... but they don't appear to be doing sooooooooo........ there showing in the polls shows how well their strategy is going.

Ontario can still be influenced...... gasp.... by the Cons bringing out the Judicial scandel to destroy the Libs..... but alas....according to their policies they don't want  people haveing the Personal Right to grow plants and pick their favourite flowers for cooking AND allowing the Courts to unsurp these Rights illegally as shown.

On to the poll

Lib    32

Con  31

NDP 16

Bloc  12

Geen  5

BUT GRITS TAKE STRONG 11-POINT LEAD IN SEAT RICH ONTARIO (44% VS. 33%)

Majority (58%) Believe Conservatives' Motive For Election Is Power Lust - Not Sincere Belief That They Can No Longer Support "Corrupt" Government (37%)

 
According to an Ipsos-Reid national survey of 1000 Canadians conducted from May 3rd to May 5th, 2005 and provided exclusively to CanWest/Global, the national Federal political horserace remains tightly contested between the Liberals (32%, up 2 points) and the Conservatives (31%, down 2 points) compared to a poll released exactly a week ago. However, it would appear that the Liberals have benefited the most in the past week as they have vaunted to take a commanding 11-point lead in the seat-rich and volatile province of Ontario (44% vs. 33%).

There also appears to be a dynamic among Canadians concerning why they think Mr. Harper and his party are committed to defeating the government and sending voters to the polls as soon as they can: Fifty-eight percent believe the Conservatives "just want to be in power" compared to four in ten (37%) who think the Conservatives want to pull the election trigger because "they sincerely believe that they can no longer support a Liberal government that is corrupt".

As for the other parties, if a Federal election were held today, 16% of voters would support the NDP (down 1 point), and 5% would support the Green Party (unchanged).

In Quebec, the Bloc Quebecois sits at 50% support (up 2 points) and holds a 30-point lead over their next closest challenger in this province, the Liberals (20%, down 1 point).

The National Vote…

According the most recent Ipsos-Reid survey, if a Federal election were held today, 32% of decided voters would support the Liberals (up 2 points), 31% would support the Conservatives (down 2 points), 16% would support the NDP (down 1 point), and 5% would support the Green Party (unchanged).

In Quebec, the Bloc Quebecois sits at 50% support (up 2 points) and holds a 30-point lead over their next closest challenger in this province, the Liberals (20%, down 1 point).

Among all Canadians, 14% are undecided, refused to say whom they would vote for, or would not vote if a Federal election were held tomorrow.

Parties Election Results June 28, 2004 April 12-14, 2005 April 19-21, 2005 April 22-24, 2005 April 26-28, 2005 May 3-5, 2005 Movement From Last Poll Since 2004 Election

The Conservative Party 30% 36% 35% 34% 33% 31% -2% +1%
The Liberals 37% 27% 30% 31% 30% 32% +2% -5%
The New Democratic Party 16% 15% 18% 18% 17% 16% -1% 0%
The Bloc Quebecois 12% 10% 12% 11% 12% 12% 0% 0%
The Green Party 4% 7% 5% 5% 5% 5% 0% +1%

Regional Highlights…

•In Ontario, the Liberals (44%, up 4 points) have widened their lead to 11-points over the Conservatives (33%, unchanged). The NDP (17%, down 2 points) battles for votes in the third position, while the Green Party (4%, down 1 point) registers lowly.

•In Quebec, the Bloc Quebecois (50%, up 2 points) have a 30-point lead over the Liberals (20%, down 1 point), as the NDP (12%, up 4 points) and the Conservatives (11%, down 5 points) contest for the third spot. Four percent of the votes are given to the Green Party (up 1 point).

•In British Columbia, the Liberals (30%, up 2 points) now have a slim lead over the Conservatives (27%, down 7 points) and the NDP (25%, up 2 points). The Green Party (15%, up 5 points) continues to trail.

•In Alberta, the Conservatives (63%, down 4 points) rule the Federal political landscape, as the Liberals (20%, up 2 points), the Green Party (6%, up 1 point) and the NDP (5%, down 1 point) trail distantly.

•In Saskatchewan/Manitoba, the Conservatives (52%, up 8 points) dominate, and currently garner more support than the NDP (23%, up 3 points), the Liberals (21%, down 9 points), and the Green Party (1%, unchanged) combined.

•In Atlantic Canada, the Liberals (45%, up 9 points) currently have the lead, followed by the Conservatives (32%, up 5 points), the NDP (17%, down 15 points), and the Green Party (3%, up 2 points).


Majority (58%) Believe Conservatives' Motive For Election Is Power Lust - Not Sincere Belief That They Can No Longer Support "Corrupt" Government (37%)…

When Canadians are asked to speculate as to why they think Stephen Harper and the Conservatives want to force an election now, the majority (58%) say it is because "they just want to be in power", while 37% believe it is because "they sincerely believe they can no longer support a Liberal government that is corrupt". Five percent say they "don't know" why they are calling an election.

•Residents of Ontario (63%) and Atlantic Canada (63%) are the most likely to believe Mr. Harper and the Conservatives "just want to be in power", followed by residents of British Columbia (61%).
•Residents of Alberta (56%) are the most inclined to think that Stephen Harper and the Conservatives are calling the election because they can no longer support a "corrupt" government, followed by residents of Saskatchewan/Manitoba (44%) and Quebec (39%).  
 

cheers :) majere
roger m roeder

Mood: don't know until the bromazapam kicks in.
Listening to: Politics with Don Newman albeit a little more smarter.

Tame, alot of opinions rehashed.

BUT, they are saying that the Cons have a slightly better chance now.....due to inroads in rural Ontario.  The Cons Polling must be showing the inroads.

It all hinges on the center of the universe....Ontario of course.

The NDP still do not count as they are just not following "Personal Rights" for all Canadians as corruption in the Judiciary (proven here) versus having fresh American air blown in along the Windsor Toronto corridor.

Then talk about the budget and parts of the budget that people just are not following. 

Huh, now that I think about it

Still a Lib minority.

The only wild card is the NDP playing the Frankel/Krieger/Parker scandel which will destroy the libs and cons both.

cheers :)  majere

Of course they can't go next door to the supreme court and get a copy of the Frankel memo and see for themselves......ndp lazy crapheads.

Mood: aaagggghhh
Listening to: CBC Newsworld re-hash old hashed news

SES: Lib 36% Con 29.5% Ndp 17.9% Bloc 12.2% Grn 4.3% ...




The dates from this Poll 30 Apr - 4 May.

I am waiting for a Poll that started on the Night of the 04 th of May which will tell a little about Chuck Guites' latest.

As you can see
the NDP
are not following thee.
tee hee hee

majere

Mood: still sick
Listening to: more news waiting for Survivor at 2000hrs

She did a pretty good job sticking to questions that people want answered.

She did allow some political buzzword/phrases in, but the little she let in was ok.

Overall she can replace my dumb don anyday as long as she sticks to forceing the guests to answere "peoples' " questions.

Thanks Susan

cheers :)  majere

Actually pretty tame with Martin deny, deny, deny I said that, deny I had that meeting etc, etc.....

Harper getting in some good soundbites but the media will not play it out enough to make a difference of course.

Jack is Jack of Toronto trying to hold on to Toronto.   His  strategy of trying to strictly ty policies to cities blows and the amount of seats he has shows.

Maybe time for a new NDP leader who can get past the smog in Toronto.
There is a whole Clean Country out there Jack, and its full of voters to.

cheers :)  majere

Now looking at a very very weak Con Minority with no thanks to Jack.

On a side note:

Harper still has not removed the "con" from Conservative Party.   In that, he is being pinned to the ropes to fully explain his Parties policies which leaves him open to critisicim al la last election.  Remember how Martin did not say anything but general buzzwords and pinned Harper on specifics?  Martin is trying it again, and Harper still isn't biting, just nibbling.  Harper just can't hold back saying what he really wants to say.......cerebal perhaps?  Or......?????? as Martin would say scary.

goddo (good band) go, sick again.

Martin calls Chuck a liar.

Guite says Martin knew.

Who do Ontarians trust???????

I imagine there will be a Poll starting tonight and ending Friday for a Friday night release.

The interesting part of the hopefully upcoming Poll will be Ontario.

The NDP are going to be looking for a nice Ontario bounce in the next Poll after Guites' testimony hits the Ontarian voters.  Will the media get it out enough for a sway?

The NDP I predict will get nothing, every vote will go to the Cons in Ontario. 

Like I said before, there is only one chance for the NDP, and that is to bring out the Frankel/Krieger/Parker scandel which will sink the Cons as well since they will be forced to admit to haveing to use the "Not Withstanding Clause" to unsurp Canadian Court Ordered Canadians Rights.  This of course transfers voters votes to be parked with the NDP for, as I predict a 50 seat win for them.

Hey Jack, its back to personal individual soverign rights to grow a god given herb in whatever quantities, whereever, as long as it does not go to anyone who is below the age of dying for ones country.

Oh I forgot Jack, your focusing on Toronto Air and Toronto Homeless, and not focussing on an issue that involves ALL Canadians Rights.

Looking at a Con Minority now, albeit tamed by the left leaning libs and sos'. 

cheers  :)  majere