Musings, perspectives, rants

Sep 14, 2005 at 09:26 o\clock

9/11 revisited

by: enzedder   Category: 9/11

It's an apt time to mention some discrepancies between the official '9/11' story and evidence which indicates an inside job.  Read the article here for just some of the discrepancies:

Cold Case

Just as I wondered, where exactly was the plane which was supposed to have hit the Pentagon?  How would a plane hit so low and not leave a trail on the grass in front (which was amazingly green and clear of debris)?  Think about the speed of the collapsing towers - they fell remarkably quickly considering it was supposed to be caused from damage towards the top of the towers.

Stories also abound of involvement by Pakistan and Israel.  For example, some Israelis (later confirmed as Mossad agents) were seen, just after the collapse of the WTC towers, laughing and jumping in apparent celebration on top of a van from which they took photos.  Something's not right here.  Just think about it - the motives and the implied involvement.  There are many books and links out there which all mention the same types of discrepancies and evidence of involvement from others (payment from a Pakistani official to one of the hijackers for example).  I urge you to read up about them and stop believing the lies told by the White House.  I can provide excerpts or links if anyone is interested.

Comments for this entry:

  1. insider2 wrote at Sep 15, 2005 at 22:37 o\clock:The most perfect lie of all is the fairy tale that has been so succesfully propogated about the fate of United 93, which crashed in a field in Pennsylvania, allegedly after the passengers took on the terrorists. It is a lovely story and what I have to say in no way diminishes my sorrow for the passengers and crew, but this was a shoot-down.

Log in to comment:

Attention: many blogigo features are only available to registered users. Register now without any obligations and get your free weblog!