Aw Diddums

Dec 14, 2007 at 18:30 o\clock

Emigrating At Long Last

by: Diddums   Category: Blogging   Keywords: moving, blogs, change, Scene, archives, Edit

Mood: Sad
Listening to: Tinnitus


I am moving my blog to WordPress. It will take me a longish time to get all my posts across as I don't think I can export them from here the usual way, especially as the feeds here on Blogigo have vamooshed.

If you are curious about Aw Diddum's old posts, you can always wander across to WordPress and see them as they come up... I'm starting from the very first post and moving on up. it's a great opportunity for me to edit the trail of verbiage I left in my wake during the glory days of Blogigo.

Presumably I won't be able to transfer visitors' old comments across, though I would if I could. Bummer.

I will continue to post any thoughts that come to mind, but not here - not any more. I'll put them on my Emergency Blogspot - that's what it's there for, after all, and it still has a feed!

See you there (and eventually here as well!)

Happy Christmas and festivities to everybody - it's been grand here on Blogigo but I must move on.

Dec 10, 2007 at 15:25 o\clock

A Hint of Humanity in the Darkness

Mood: Getting on and climbing out of my fog of funk
Listening to: Bee Gees tape


Folk are supposed to give honest (but tactful) appraisals of each other's work on an art site I'm on, but that can be a hard thing to do, presumably for the following reasons:

  1. "don't want to hurt their feelings"
  2. "not sure I know enough to be able to judge"
  3. "don't want to get involved; too busy"
  4. "don't want to lose my friends"
  5. "I'm sure they can see their own mistakes, or will eventually"
  6. "someone else will bring it up; I don't have to"
  7. "I don't want to end up getting nasty messages"
  8. "if I don't like it, silence will tell them all they need to know"

Number 8 is the most depressing.

I've had my weak moments - in fact, most of the time I'm weak, and either I point out all the best features then shuffle off cravenly, or say nothing at all. But occasionally (usually when I see enough in the picture that I like) I'll stick my head over the parapet and say "wonder what it'd look like if you..."

And so far nobody's put a bullet through my helmet.

Well, there was one glancing shot I wasn't sure of, just a private message that seemed to suggest the photo was just how it was, and couldn't be re-shot - take it or leave it. Ignored that one!

Actually, it's amazing how thick my skin has become lately, but every so often an arrow will strike home, and I'll curl up in front of the TV for a couple of days. Every day that you post or comment on the internet, you know you're risking that.

A couple of weeks ago on the art site I spotted a thumbnail I quite liked, but when I called up the image full-size it struck me as strange and unsatisfying. When you run your eyes over a picture, you like it to be sharp here, soft there, and nothing interrupting the flow of it without reason. It's almost as if you know already how that picture should look, and you're comparing the real one with the ideal.

The one I was looking at fell short - nobody would ever have framed it and put it on their wall, or used it in a magazine advert. I still believe that.

There had been two or three comments already, saying "very nice."
I screwed my courage to the sticking place and said, "well I liked the such and such, which caused me to open the thumbnail, but (blah tactful blah tactful blah) - keep working on it!"

I kept an eye on it to see if anybody else agreed with me, or in case I got a response from the photographer. He never did respond, but the list of comments grew as long as my arm and longer still. Every day there would be a few more, and every single one of them said:

"Oh, wonderful work, my dear! This needs nothing changed. I love this."

I seriously began to wonder what was wrong with me, especially as I had been watching another photographer whose works are (without fail) dull, featureless and oversharpened. But everyone else falls into ecstasies over her gallery. It's almost as though she has groupies - but surely they're groupies for a reason?

It really makes me wonder if my sense of aesthetics is broken. I got so desperate I called in Mum for her opinion on the photographer with the groupies. She scrolled through the gallery, said "BORING!", got out of her chair, and left. All in three seconds flat.

Can't just be me, then?

The last straw thudded onto my back when the image I'd criticized in the comments was put on the site's front page. It's not 'image of the week' or anything like that; they just get together a group of images to share the limelight for a while and to reel the casual surfers in. I have a sneaky feeling at least one of my images got in there; a handful of comments came out of the blue from people who don't normally comment on my stuff - but it was never proven! That's why I tell people "I found this image on the front page" - just so they know. They're usually pleased enough to say "thanks for telling me."

The moderators don't put anything they don't like on the front page, so when I saw that half-baked picture up there, I started to lose my grip. I said to myself, "I really must be missing something! How can I ever expect to turn out good work myself when I don't recognize it in others?"

It's possible that certain images naturally look more beautiful on a PC. My Mac sits next to my PC, and I can see the differences clearly. The Mac brightens everything up, tones everything down and warms the colour - thus things stand out that aren't even visible on the PC. It's caught me out in the past when I thought I'd made a nice graphic on the PC, but it looked absolutely horrible on the Mac - you could see the areas I thought were carefully blended into the background.... So perhaps I could see flaws in the picture that the PC users couldn't.

I was on the point of posting a thread in the discussion forums to ask if people viewed wallpapers full size (largest size size possible) before commenting - they will miss grain, blemishes and other peculiarities if they don't. I never got that far - it appears that other people had been simmering silently as well.

Someone exploded into life and posted a thread asking why people will butter up everybody else rather than be honest - we are supposed to be helping each other, not over-inflating egos. There followed a long and interesting discussion... buoyed up by it, I found a wallpaper by a 15 year-old. He's only received a few comments, mostly by others around the same age who saw his works as 'cool'. They were, but could be cooler still. I said I liked it a lot, but what I looked for in a picture was... (blah tactful blah tactful blah).

For a couple of days, all was silent (nothing unusual in that, so it didn't trouble me).

Earlier last night I was watching Mad Max Beyond the Thunderdome, all the time thinking about StumbleUpon, people (both online and offline), my blogs and every other online presence I have. I felt singularly useless, as though I'm just whispering into a void. Who cares what I think? What difference does any of it make? I'm not really helping myself or anyone else, and StumbleUpon is lots of fun but a huge waste of time. All it is, is a jumble of odd photos, cartoons, videos and pages of links and tips being shuttled around... some of it useful but most not.

My jaw set hard as I watched Mad Max... I'm quite sure he'd have stared me into the ground if I started waffling to him about blogs, StumbleUpon and online communities in general.

I still had to check my email, so (having left the computer off all day) I went upstairs about 23:00 and fired up the Mac. Even while I was waiting for it to power up, I was grumbling to myself "why am I doing this, even though I just told myself it was as piffle before the wind, and unimportant in anyone's life...? I should leave it till tomorrow."

But I found a response from the 15 year-old artist: "Thanks for your advice, I'm actually working on redoing that particular piece right now and that seems to be exactly what I couldn't figure out about the first draft."

See, I can make a difference!
Whoo.

That was probably one of the nicest things somebody's said to me for a while - that I offered something useful at the right moment. Even if it was via the anonymous, wayward, unheeding, overloaded, shadowy internet!

PS: You don't have to believe my remarks about StumbleUpon, which came out of a fit of depression. While there, I have found many pages of more than passing interest to me, and amongst them was this article on the rival attractions of Facebook and StumbleUpon. Ultimately it's what people choose to make of the tools they have. In StumbleUpon's case, it's all about quality content - we have to fix on that and not on traffic. Forget the traffic - choose quality over quantity, and give good solid reviews so that people know where you're coming from.

I'm not especially keen on stumbling across isolated pictures... there are many beautiful ones for sure, but they seem so much out of context. (What? Who? Where? Why?) I don't often rate those at all, but I'll rate an entire site of pictures so that people can look themselves.

I'll pick out specific blog posts for StumbleUpon attention - we should see more of those, and not just from the techy or news blogs.

PPS: I won't be doing that right now - got to get on with some work. To help me in that, I should turn off the computer... with its siren call and its myriad of shadowy souls...

Dec 6, 2007 at 18:26 o\clock

Feed Options in Blogger

by: Diddums   Category: Blogging   Keywords: Blogging, Blogspots, experimental, layouts, RSS, feeds, comments, polls

Mood: Still messing around doing not very much - bad!
Listening to: Ghost song in my head: 'Malaika' by Miriam Makeba


Looking at the Blogger in Draft news for December 4th about Subscription Links, I fell to wondering. At first I thought "oh, new (or updated) feature, got to go and turn that on!" Then I stopped and thought "but I never wanted those things. I never use them on other sites - why would I want them on mine?"

The issue is probably not whether I want them, but whether others use them? In my case I have a quick way of subscribing to a blog - it's Bloglines, and I have a 'subscribe with Bloglines' button permanently in my Firefox toolbar. As I know exactly where that button is, it saves me searching round the blog for something that might not be there.

My guess is that most other people have got it sorted out as well - they have their own ways of subscribing? I left a poll in the sidebar of my emergency blogspot - hoping for a few votes. It's up till 14th December.

Maybe it would only help a new person who was looking to start a feed account somewhere. I've put it on my emergency blogspot so people can see what I'm talking about - it's at the bottom of the sidebar. There's a subscribe to 'comments feeds' as well. I only ever do that if I'm given the option... I don't know if there are ways of subscribing to comments feeds even without the handy clicky box?

Anyway - who wants to subscribe to a potty emergency blog...? (Listens to the silence that echoes back). Ah well. It's just that when Blogigo blows up in my face, you would know if and when I switched over to the blogspot channel...

This is the song that's in my head just now... just to give this blog post some atmosphere. :-).

It's not actually my favourite version - I prefer it quick and jolly, as sung in the version we had... possibly Fadhili William himself, but I don't have the single here to check. There's no video clip that I can find.

What annoys me about some clips on YouTube is that they say something like 'Dithery Song by Original Famous Singer of Dithery Song'... and when you look at it, it's NOT that singer... it's somebody else you don't even recognize. If I didn't have some idea what I was looking at (or at least a niggly feeling of doubt), that would be really misleading.

Dec 1, 2007 at 22:45 o\clock

O Wim Ihweh

Mood: Mildly struck
Listening to: 'The Lion Sleeps Tonight'


On YouTube I kept listening to The Lion Sleeps Tonight clip (otherwise known as Wimoweh). With it still ringing in my ears, I went to comment on Goldfish's latest blog post. The captcha was ihweh.

Dec 1, 2007 at 15:01 o\clock

Grumbling On

Mood: A little cheesed off
Listening to: 'The Lion Sleeps Tonight'


I edited my Blogger profile so that it's just a tiny bit more interesting. It occurred to me to put my main blog in as 'my web page'. So all is not completely lost. I'm still not happy with the new commenting method.

There was something else I was going to say - now, what was it? Oh yes, there's a conversation going on over here at Suburban Oblivion about the Blogger/Google comments.

I thought there was still something else. No, it's completely gone...

Oh wait!! I doubt if you read my long post Puzzled Blogger about yesterday's trials and tribulations with my main blog, but one of the things I mentioned was that we've always had this problem on Blogigo (not just me) of our profiles saying we all lived in Afghanistan. It didn't matter how often we tried to change that (and yes, we clicked on the 'save changes' button), it completely ignored us.

I thought it was a purely Blogigo quirk, so imagine how I felt when I went into the Blogger profile to edit it, and it said THERE that I came from Afghanistan.

I think they should add a new country to the drop-down menu of countries, as I'm living there instead... The Twilight Zone.

Nov 30, 2007 at 21:12 o\clock

Baulked Blogger

by: Diddums   Category: Blogging   Keywords: Blogging, gitches, Servers, offline

Mood: Fed up
Listening to: Ghost song in my head: 'Trials and Tribulations' from JCS


There seems to be some work going on in Blogigo. A few times I have logged out and then tried to go back in for something, only to be faced with a message that everything is being moved to a faster server. Well, that's good. Fröhlich. Perhaps some of the other site glitches will be sorted out as well, in time. That recent problem with new posts not appearing on the home page has already been dealt with.

Just now it seems to be the blogigo.co.uk domain that's affected - something to do with a loop of redirects that doesn't work. The other Blogigo blogs (non-UK) are showing up. Maybe there's a reason for it - wish I knew.

Just to moan a little, it's frustrating when you post something, spot a typo straight away - and when you go back in to correct it, you can't, because the site is down. It's then a case of 'hold that thought' till it all comes back online again.

The typo looms larger and larger in your mind, like a spot on the nose.

The thought that nobody can see it right now is not a comfort - you just know when you give up and stop watching the site that the blog post will immediately reappear to the view of the world, complete with typo.

You are also reminded that because the blog post has gone offline, any subscribers getting notifications that there's a new post will try to view it - to no avail. The past three times I've posted something, the site has gone offline very quickly afterwards! It's not me, though - this poor site gets so many spammers posting their boring little splogs here that your own post doesn't stay at the top of the 'recent posts' list for very long. Probably the sploggers are the ones breaking Blogigo. It's their loss as well as ours, is all I can say.

I'm off for lunch. Bet the site comes back online the minute I leave the room. (Trails off, moaning like Marvin the robot).

Jul 27, 2007 at 20:25 o\clock

Maddened Pond Life

by: Diddums   Category: Blogging   Keywords: Blogging, splogs, scammers, FALSE, identity

Mood: Maddened
Listening to: Peace and quiet


OK, I'm trying to learn something, so if anyone reading this knows any of the answers, feel free to weigh in. It's about blogs that get taken over. I seem to remember that if someone wants the URL of someone else's abandoned blog (for instance with the made-up name Crummy Bear), it's sometimes possible to persuade the hibernating ex-owner to hand it over.

What happens then - what do you actually get from the newly staked claim - just the URL? Do you get the title of the blog as well?

No, I don't want to do this - I just came across such a blog with such a title, and the content is anything but.

There are Google ads on it, and the content is a little strange, using such strange words it's almost unreadable - 'splog' springs to mind, but the topic and ideas are constant (and impersonal) even if verbiage the proceeds astray multiple instances... you get the drift. It does not appear to be selling anything (except the ad space) but it's definitely not about a Crummy Bear.

Also, there are exactly 13 entries per month. Something oddly robotic about that.

I looked at the profile and it only contains the blog name - Crummy Bear.

Worse than that, it has a very good spot on a blogs directory. It's on the first page of its section with a reasonable Google Page Rank, and is still described as being the Crummy Bear blog by a crummy beary blogger. (Of course I made that name up so I hope there isn't really a Crummy Bear out there). I started out by using a different name that I thought was generic but at the same time unlikely, but then I looked it up and somebody was using it... so I had to think of another name and make changes all through my blog post. (Resists the urge to go after the offending genuine user with a frying pan).

I considered writing to the blog directory about the strange blog, as it was at the very least being promoted under false pretences in the wrong section. Unfortunately there doesn't appear to be an email address to write to, or a form. There might be if I can remember my ID and password to log in (aargh! I thought I carefully noted all these things!!) but at the moment I'm having to discard that idea.

OK - it's a Blogger blog; maybe I can flag it - but it's probably little concern of Blogger's if it has been taken over in an above-board fashion by this nameless new blogger who doesn't write about Crummy Bear affairs, but doesn't write about bad things either. It just seems strange. Perhaps it's more important to get the blog directory to check on it than to blother Blogger about it. (Sorry, typo). It just annoys me that it's there taking up the best promotional space when it's possibly a splog - wouldn't a self-respecting blogger come up with a title at least of his own?

Any thoughts?

Jul 19, 2007 at 12:55 o\clock

Blogging Admonishments

by: Diddums   Category: Blogging   Keywords: horoscopes, Words, Wisdom, forecast, stars, oops

Mood: Waking up further the later it gets
Listening to: House still distantly humming


Do you think these horoscope writers realize I (we) blog?? I received the following Gemini horoscope for Wednesday July 18th:

Like it or not, you simply cannot control how other people see you right now, although you might feel like you should at least try. But avoid this futile exercise today - there is no point in trying to convey a particular side of your personality. It's too exhausting, and it's way too silly. You need to show your entire self to the world! Sure, from time to time your thoughts might be misread - but who cares? You can't be held responsible for the way other people's minds work. Be yourself!