Aw Diddums

Dec 8, 2007 at 18:00 o\clock

Tempted by Stephen Fry

Mood: Sighing
Listening to: James Galway: The Man with the Golden Flute


With his article ...on pimping your browser, Stephen Fry will have prompted a spate of people to try out new 'skins' on their Firefox browsers - including me. I looked at the themes before, in fact only a few days ago, but what always put me off going for any of the Firefox add-ons is the message "unsigned... you should only install software from sources that you trust."

My mother...? That rather limits my options!

This time I decided if those themes on the Firefox page were fine for Stephen Fry, they were fine for me... (cue all those techy guys to snort even more). If anything goes wrong, though, I won't blame him - I'll blame myself for finally giving way to temptation.

I downloaded a bundle of Firefox themes from the Mozilla site and went through them, one by one. Most of them were too grey. What is it about the colour grey?? I don't mind silvery ones if they do have a bit of a shine to them, but flat grey or even pale grey mixed with white has always struck me as rather dreich.

But look who's blogging - you only need to glance at this theme and my other one on the Blogspot to realize that grey doesn't have a lot of place in my life. (I wish they would come up with some nicer-coloured Nav bars in Blogger - the other three are even worse).

It doesn't stop with the web... I don't use plain white pages in my general applications if I can avoid it. Ages ago I went into the Firefox preferences, clicked on the Content tab and changed the page colour to a soft violet blue. Sometimes it shows up behind web pages... for instance, it will show up if you go into Newsgator (possibly only if you have an account) and change from the 'beta reader' to the classic reader. I don't want to be backward in any way, seeming like someone who can't abide change, but I didn't like the beta reader because there was much more white in it - and web pages with more than a certain amount of white in them dazzle my eyes. I switched back to my nice kind classic reader, but they say it will be phased out in time. Sigh.

I've tinted my MS Word documents on the PC (I can't remember how, so don't ask me), but couldn't figure out how to do it on the Mac. (There's a 'blue backgrounds, white text' option, but that's too far the other way!) All my Eudora emails arrive in a lovely shade of cornflower blue.

For me white is too bright, black is too dark, and grey is too... um... (trying to be polite as it's just struck me that a lot of my favourite sites use white and grey. Caedes.net, for example. Maybe Caedes would say it's so that our pictures will stand out better. Sure. Sigh).

In StumbleUpon I was disappointed because all the colours are on the dark side for me. There's an option with a pale blue header but the rest of the page is a stark staring white. There's a pink with a nice design at the foot, but it's far too strong a pink for me. All the other colours are dark, except for a grey header with white... There seems to be no way of personally customizing your StumbleUpon page.

What? Yes, I'm on StumbleUpon now. Misc But that's a story for another time.

I've just realized you don't have to fiddle around in Newsgator to see what I mean about tinted Firefox pages showing up through the web page... you get that on the StumbleUpon home page too. Looks rather good. Much better than plain white.

My favourite Firefox 'skin' or theme so far is CloudGnome. But I've just spotted another theme that somehow I missed the first time round, so don't assume that is my final choice...


PS: If you're skipping across to the Blogspot to see what kind of bish I made of it, don't forget to vote in the 'feeds' poll while you're there.

Nov 28, 2007 at 17:40 o\clock

Saving on Internet Accounts

Mood: Kicking myself
Listening to: Ghost song in my head: 'Malaika' by Fadhili William


It's a jolly good thing we did do the Gadget Show broadband test - it was a catalyst for change. I didn't know all that much about the terms of Mum's broadband account (which I'm sharing) so when I said it was advertised on the ISP's site as 'up to 8 Mb', E said “we've both got the 512 Kb package, which means the broadband speed is as good as we can expect.”
“Oh,” I said, “I looked on the ISP's site and didn't realize they were selling it in different speeds - mea culpa.”

E got suspicious, rootled around, and announced that the packages have been changed and they don't sell different speeds any more - just different download limits. However, Mum (and E) are still stuck on the old 512 Kb packages. Mum is paying £30 a month for hers... which means she could have been getting 'up to 8 Mb' speeds and a capacious download limit of 30 GB for that price - but as far as I'm aware, they didn't tell her.

You know, there's something about that that's just not honest!

We decided to 'downgrade' to a 2 GB package, which will save Mum £10 a month. If we need more, we will get extra blocks if we pay... but it's not as expensive as paying £10 a month for a download capacity we're not using.

I decided to check my dial-up account, which I only keep now for the email address. It's a very old, very cheap account, and I didn't think I could do better, but it turns out there's a still cheaper option by the same ISP, with the added bonus of a limited amount of free internet surf time, which I wasn't getting with the old account.

I don't know who I'm most annoyed with - the ISP for not keeping us abreast of these account changes, or myself for not keeping an eagle eye on them.

I've put in account change requests for both the broadband and dial-up accounts. Mum was thinking of switching to a different ISP but they have a very bad press on the ISP Review UK site at the moment. We've been with our current ISP for years and I don't remember anything but the smallest and most temporary of glitches. Hopefully it will stay that way! And maybe we'll see our broadband speeds improve - fingers crossed.

My ISP moves fast - I put in my bid to change the dial-up account last night, and today I got a message to say it will change at the end of my monthly billing period to the new account. Talk about speedy.

Being in the mood all of a sudden to save money, I rushed into my telephone account and cancelled the Caller Display at my house... I'm not even there to use it. The fax machine is sitting here in Mum's house now.

Life is so..... complicated!!! Full of fidgety little things you forget to monitor! And I'm quite sure that's what 'they' are counting on. Sigh.

Nov 27, 2007 at 00:18 o\clock

Broadband Speeds

Mood: No different
Listening to: Nothing


Britain's broadband speeds are well behind the rest of Europe's, and the advertising is generally misleading - it's said that nobody gets anything like the speeds they're offered. Big Sister and I have just taken part in the broadband speed test by the Gadget Show on Five. We got the following results:

Download speed (mine) 487 kbps.
Download speed (sister's) 490 kbps.
Upload speed (mine) 17 kbps.

We're on the 512kB package anyway, it seems - actually we've been thrown into confusion about that and are trying to find out just what it is we're paying for, as it seems things have changed since we signed up - we're now expecting 'up to 8 Mb' (we are??) but there are other conditions we didn't know about. Meanwhile I'm not sure if that upload speed is par for the course?

Busy

Nov 17, 2007 at 21:49 o\clock

Waiting on the World to Change

Mood: Tiring
Listening to: House buzzing


I have a link to the Webfetch metasearch engine (I hope that's the right term). It compiles the results from several search engines including Google. However, they don't pass any 'identifiable' data to them - see Cookies in Webfetch's blog. It's worth reading even if you're happy with your current search engine.

I was particularly fascinated by the 'show engine position' feature - you can see which engines had which results. I tried a Webfetch search for a friend's site, and discovered it was on only three search engines. Quite a nifty way of checking! Some of the results were not on Google - it seems that some pages from the same site are, some are not.

Webfetch was recommended by the ComputerActive magazine a few issues back.

I meant to use it more than I did, and still found myself Googling, but largely that was because I have a Firefox browser with a little search box in the top right corner. It was set to Google and I was in the habit of doing my searches from there. Today I realized I should be able to change it to any search engine I liked... so all my searches will be with you-know-who from now on!

One more link (not connected to search engines):

Waiting on the world to change - link to video pinched from browneyedgirl.

I should have called my blog that - sums up my cast of mind! The ironic thing is, I can't sign... I'm one of those needing to change. I wasn't taught sign language as a young child, as it was considered in those days that everybody should be made to communicate orally.

Oct 6, 2007 at 15:26 o\clock

Stumbling Through the Fog

Mood: More alert
Listening to: Ghost song in my head: 'Seasons in the Sun'


I've been busy editing - that's not an excuse, it's a reason. It disrupts the chain of thought and leaves little room for anything else. I did try writing this a few days in, but didn't have time to post it.



"Will you be finished tonight?" enquired M.
"Only if the next report is a short little one," I said.
I opened it up and it had 60 pages, largely complex tables and forms. I tried updating the Table of Contents, just in passing, and Word froze up and had to be force-quitted.


I went all the way to Planet Zog and now I'm forcing myself home for a visit. All around me: clouds. can you see them? They're a bit white - not black and heavy. I'm deeply absorbed in editing and it's quite frightening. I'm vaguely aware I'm at my computer desk at Mum's, but it's the desk I used so much at home that I feel I'm back there in the little pink room at the corner by the fuchsia bush. The curtains were wide open and it was dark, and I thought - it was more a subconscious 'seep' than a thought - that all the neighbours and passers by would see me working there unless I broke off to close the drapes. Eventually I glanced up, and outside the long window were just treetops. Oh yes. No people.

Sometimes I believe I'm alone in the house and am disturbed to hear Mum's footfall in the background - even though she's been there all along and I knew about it. If she comes in, I'm not quite sure what she might be coming to talk to me about or if I'll be able to rally enough to pay attention, and the confusion throws my stomach into turmoil.

When I'm working, I don't know what time it is or where I am; I've forgotten to walk the dog next door, put the washing out, get food, watch The Eggheads (the clock has ticked on past). And when I do drag myself down to eat and watch The Eggheads, my thoughts are so much elsewhere I can barely comprehend what the questions are.

I woke up enough to observe CJ - I don't know what to make of him. I like him, and at the same time not really. I think he would be constantly shocked at my ignorance. I woke up even more when someone (not an Egghead) said Paddington was the Bear with Very Little Brain. In the very next quiz (or maybe the one after that) somebody said she had no interest in children's books - and suggested Mildred Hubble was from A Little Princess (I'm not sure I'm remembering right so it might have been another book - certainly not The Worst Witch).

I remarked to Mum that folk don't understand why I still read children's books, then they sail off to quizzes and are stumped when presented with questions every three-year-old knows the answer to. But now I'm as superior as CJ. I would be every bit as lost if asked about Eastenders or Coronation Street.

Sharky says he misses me. He come over from the sofa at the back of the room and paws me with increasing desperation. He says I'm not quite all there and he can't talk to me any more.

I need to sleep now, though things are just as bad there. Half asleep, I think about the sofa I'm lying on and the layout of the sitting room, then realize it's a proper bed, in a small bedroom upstairs. I'm still not where I think I am.

Just rolling over and going to sleep in that state of confusion is not good, and I need to get back in touch with the here and now. Hence the scrawled blog post at 2 a.m.

Aug 14, 2007 at 00:40 o\clock

Quitting Splitter

Mood: Headachy
Listening to: Quietness


Mum has 'the lurgy' and has had it for several days now - every day she seems worse instead of better. Very depressing. On top of that, she said this morning that her phone wasn't working. The broadband was operating as usual.

I spent most of the day trying to fix it, emailing Big Sister for suggestions and scratching my head. The pattern that slowly emerged was that the phone only worked if broadband was off. Big Sister suggested that one of the splitters was damaged, and I should swap them with the spare one. So I replaced the one upstairs, accidentally cutting off a phone conversation between her and Mum. But that was it - the splitter I replaced was the one acting up. Big Sister said that's the one that came with the router. Hmm.

She asked Mum why she rang her up, coughed loudly in her ear, and rang off again. Presumably that was when I accidentally interrupted the phone call, but I couldn't help laughing.

Surely one day it will be much easier to discover which tiny part of a complex system has backfired, rather than spending all day trying to make sense of it.

Anyway, thanks to our persistence, everything's hunky dory again - except that, when I said I should set everything back to normal (plug the phone back in downstairs instead of keeping it attached to a long cable we now have trailing up the stairs), I was told 'no' - I'm not allowed to touch it in case it all goes pear-shaped again. Mum's just enjoying the breathing space of Everything Actually Working. She's also gone to bed early - I'll follow her example after this as I've been feeling headachy all day (and all yesterday). It wears thin when every day you're trying to get to grips with organizing stuff, and every day you feel below par for no obvious reason. I know I should just get on with stuff anyway - I haven't caught Mum's lurgy even though I've been trapped in this house with her all this time - well, not trapped with her, but trapped with her coughing and hacking and teary-eyed-ness, and the terrifying tissues draped over her face. Makes me throw open the door and take deep breaths of the pine-fresh air outside.

But, when I was outside bringing in the washing, I embarked on a little fantasy that she had the plague, and I was here looking after her selflessly, keeping bravely away from the rest of humanity so that we wouldn't spread it further. So far I'm surviving! Below par, but it could have been a lot worse. Please drop your baskets of food at the end of the driveway.

Wish she would get better.

Aug 11, 2007 at 02:47 o\clock

Rip-off Britain: Food for Thought

Mood: Interested
Listening to: Ghost song in my head: 'Dance Away' by Roxy Music


After years of not bothering to read computer magazines, I'm going through a spell of trying this one and that, including one 3D art magazine - I forget the title just now, but they are all expensive so I won't make a habit of it! It might depend on the freebie. (Though I think most software freebies from magazines are freebies anyway - you would get them from somewhere on the internet if you happened to be looking in the right direction).

I started on a magazine yesterday that I bought before I moved, so it's been sitting around for... a couple of weeks? It was PC Pro, the August 2007 issue. I enjoyed it very much, and was particularly interested in their article Rip-off Britain: Excuses Exposed. "We expose the excuses behind extortionate prices."

There's certainly no way I would be buying Photoshop at its current price here. I'm not sure about trying to get a copy from friends in the States either, as someone was telling me about getting a U.S. copy of Quark Xpress some years ago, only to discover she couldn't run it.

Nor do I have any intention of dabbling in the 'grey market', which is something I've not even heard of till now, though I knew there was some strangely priced software on eBay - I wasn't sure what the story was. I really needed to read a magazine like this. It hit the spot, somehow - I felt like someone thirsting for information she wasn't finding - till now.

I'm not advertising the magazine; I simply wanted to talk about the article they wrote, and hoped it would be online so I could drop a link to it.


'Loneliness is a crowded room... full of open hearts turned to stone, all together all alone'
[from 'Dance Away' by Roxy Music]

Talking of someone thirsting for information, I've felt that way for years about the mysteries of subtitling. I mentioned yesterday about lagging subtitles when trying to watch The Last Boy Scout on ITV2. Earlier I discovered that the subtitling quality seemed to depend somewhat on the hardware I'm using - one set-top box will be different from another (maybe due to their differing software issues) and both will be different from a digital TV. Since then I've noticed something else...

My mother bought a DVD recorder and I'm gradually familiarizing myself with it - it's better to know beforehand how to record something that you might suddenly notice just 5 minutes before going out. You should also know the best way to record it, and be sure that it will include the subtitles rather than slip back to the default of 'none'. I experimented with taping to an old blank VHS, and now I was trying a blank DVD. I set it to record The Last Boy Scout - the same one I was trying to watch.

Next day I opened the DVD index and played the film to see what the quality was like. The subtitles were slotting in much better than they did when we watched them on the TV. In particular I remembered when the shooter knelt down in the rain and said something....

... no subtitles....

The scene changed. Still no subtitles. I said to Mum "WHAT did he say?"
Mum said "actually, I don't know."
Then the text flashed up on the screen: "Life's a bitch."

Sure is! That I know. And I wonder if she just didn't want to say it. Anyway, there had been all that long time waiting for that one short line; I distinctly remembered it. And when the same scene arrived on my DVD recording, with the shooter kneeling in the rain, he said his piece - and it instantly flashed up on the screen. It was right there below his dripping face.

The pace stayed steady and reliable through the 'go get his watch' business, then something suddenly changed, and it began to lag. Then that interruption - "We apologize but there are no subtitles for this programme."

I wonder what happened? Did someone lean on the wrong button?

I don't know how the subtitles can vary depending on what one's using to watch it with, and at the same time there's something distinct going on, such as whatever caused those subtitles to come to a halt. It's all a mystery to me, and it's hard to request improvements when you're not sure what it is that needs to be improved.

I need information. There's a dry desert in my soul, with myself wandering there, lost and confused...

Aug 8, 2007 at 01:48 o\clock

An 'Ah Ha' Moment

Mood: A little grumpy
Listening to: Sharky shouting (though he's just had a dish of cold meat)


I've just been making comparisons...

My TV is upstairs - the old analogue TV with the Freeview set-top box (STB).

Mum's new digital TV is downstairs - no STB required.

I tried to watch The Sixth Sense (ITV2) on my TV upstairs, and found I would get one line of text and then nothing - till I switched away and then switched back, when I would get another line of text and then nothing. I gave up and watched something else instead (Evolution, which is supposed to be a comedy but wasn't especially funny), then it occurred to me to see if the same thing was happening on Mum's digital TV downstairs. All the subtitles were coming through successfully. I could have watched The Sixth Sense on her TV, but she doesn't like spooky films.

I have two STBs (long story) and was using the one that provides BBC4 subtitles. The other STB doesn't (just one line of text, then nothing).

I've been reading a forum thread that makes me think this is something that could possibly be sorted out via software update (if they've adjusted those particular glitches). Ah. (A little lightbulb starts glowing dimly above Diddums's head). So this is a software problem?

Engineering Channel Download Schedule appears to be the link to look at when checking for software updates (if you live in the UK). I can count myself lucky if my older STB ever updates again, as apparently the last update we got for it (which I fielded by sheer good fortune) was purely because the box would have stopped working altogether when they made certain changes to digital transmissions in the UK. Otherwise they're not really interested in continuing to support it.

Mutter.

Jul 12, 2007 at 00:57 o\clock

Kaboom! (or Nearly)

Mood: Fuzzy
Listening to: Ghostly song in my head: 'The Rhythm of the Rain' by The Cascades


I was going to post a collection of links to other blog posts, but decided to sit on the project for a while - there are a few things I want to have 'mature' in my thoughts.

I'm also feeling a little dazed after surfing around on the internet, for no reason I know of - sometimes the happenings you read about in the newspapers and other people's strong opinions on various topics just get to you, and instead of fighting back, you want to curl in a ball. For the time being, anyway.

It doesn't matter just now, because I have another story. I could have told it several weeks ago, but needed to find out the end of the story for myself first.

Midnight Chills

One night I was working late (till 3 a.m.) My ears were tired and I was resting them by not wearing hearing aids (those things can get quite uncomfortable before many hours are up). That means I couldn't really hear much at all - there's some sound but it's hardly even recognizable as 'sound' - it's more like a bubble of nothing, or lying back in the bath with your ears under water (only worse).

So, around 3 a.m. I turned off the computers and went to bed on the sofa as usual. Turned off the lamp and started to lie back. There was a violent white flash.

Startled, I sat up, and felt a loud, thudding rumble - it seemed to rise through the sofa. How was I hearing that, and what was going on? It seemed so 'wrong' for that time of night that I was scared. I picked up Sharky the cat when I went to investigate. He didn't seem to object.

I looked outside, and the rain was coming down so hard that there was a light spray rising through the trees. Nobody was about; no lights were on. Another brilliant flash (causing a parked car to flare in sympathy) caused me to drop the blind and retire.

It was 'just' a thunderstorm. At least I now knew what it was and felt able to go back to bed. But what a thunderstorm!

I hesitate to say I've never been through a storm as bad, as I may have forgotten or not been aware of similar storms when I was a child or sleeping. But this is the worst I remember going through. I know people have it worse in other places, quite naturally and regularly, but in this part of Scotland it's fairly unusual, at least in this period of time.

The rattling crash I felt in my bones had still upset me, and I was worried my failing PC had exploded. That had to be checked out too, and I went to see how the computers were. Fortunately everything was quiet in the nursery.

There you are - in case you've always wondered. When there's an apparent disaster in the middle of the night, my first thought (after "where's Sharky?") is "how are the computers holding out?"

I'm not sure what I would have done if they HAD exploded and there was an electrical fire in progress - gone screaming for the neighbours, possibly. Oh, wait - the fire brigade is only across the road. I could have run there in my slippers.

Anyway, all seemed quiet in the house, so I went to bed and pulled the downie over my head. Sharky lay next to me. I could still see the lightning flashes - they were directly out of a Gothic movie and seemed to shiver through the windows every 30 seconds or so. This went on for ages, but finally I fell asleep, thinking "must get up early - bound to be a flood. This I have to see."

The disturbed night meant that I woke late - and when I finally looked outside, there was no flood - just the mud left in its wake. There were muddy footprints all over town for several days after, including some of mine, and some muddy trolley tracks as well (courtesy of Bluebird). According to the local paper, there was over an inch of rain in one hour, and soil was washed onto the roads from the nearby fields. That doesn't sound much rain to me, but what do I know? I do know the mud was something we don't get every day, and the rain I glanced out at around 3 a.m. was coming down like a misty waterfall.

The story isn't finished.

Next day I went out to feed some cats in an old house in town. As usual, I pottered down to the basement, and it had a very large puddle in it. I had contact details for a family member of the people who owned the house, so I got my mother to ring up, and the guy said he would pop over and have a look. When the owners of the house returned, they said it had been bad and there had been some damage, but it could have been a lot worse if we hadn't let them know.

That same day I bought a new Scart cable for my TV set-up, and tried to use it at night. But my TV picture was largely snow, and I couldn't get digital channels at all. I could watch the video OK - it behaved as though there was nothing wrong. Looked like the TV had been damaged in the storm, though I'd unplugged it - unfortunately forgetting about the aerial. Later I searched online and found quite an old BBC article that said a lady in England got up one morning and her TV set exploded when lightning struck.... though it was unplugged. The lightning got at it through the aerial, and all the plug sockets in the house were blown.

Well - now I know! Don't forget to disconnect the AERIAL in a storm. It's sheer stupidity on my part that I never thought of it, but it's also partly that one reads frequent advice to unplug at the mains, but I don't remember anyone adding "and don't forget the aerial."

No, I don't have the right to blame anyone else for this; my brain just doesn't work properly, it seems. I'm actually very glad that it happened to the TV and not to either of my computers - and that storm was really raging; it was probably stabbing all round the house as I calmly worked - both computers had been on. The first I knew about the storm was when I turned the light out, and everything lit up in a lurid glare.

Anyway... the story STILL isn't finished! I'll wait till you fetch another drink (and maybe some popcorn).

The paper said that people all over town were having problems with their TV sets (and other electrical gadgets). The local TV repair man was quoted as saying that people 'forget' that lightning carries a million volts.

"Wha..?" I huffed, turning pale. "We just forgot to disconnect our aerials. We're dumb that way. But don't accuse us of thinking lightning is just a pretty light show."

Maybe the paper drastically edited what he really said; possibly he threw the paper down in a purple fit when he read that. Anyway...

I can usually work out technological problems when allowed a few days, the internet, some manuals and a lot of brow-knitting, but now I could see no obvious reason for the TV acting up (apart from the storm). I checked the cables and then gave up - couldn't see what I could possibly do about it apart from call the local TV repair man. But Mum kept her head and decided to look at the system bit by bit to try and figure out the weak link. Her first choice was the signal booster. We took it to her house and tried it on her own TV, and it was definitely fried. Ah ha! Weak link.

We changed to another booster, but the television still wasn't working properly. We checked and double-checked all the cables, took things out of the 'daisy chain' of appliances, put them back in, bought new cables; even went up into the loft and glared at the aerial - nothing worked. And yet I had a feeling that my television was in good order.

This continued for weeks. Finally we called out the TV repair man (the same one casting aspersions on the population of Diddumstown). Today he came, looked at the TV, went up in the loft and twiddled with the aerial, and bingo! It was WORKING. Clear picture, clear sound, and Freeview digital TV was back!

How did he do that?

He said some wires in the loft aerial had come loose and had to be 'tightened'. That was all it was. Mum said "oh my, then it was just pure coincidence that it happened on the night of the storm."
"Yes," I said. "Very confusing."

Then I knitted my brow. "And yet.... I'm not sure it WAS a coincidence. The signal booster was damaged."

"Oh, maybe," said Mum. "It could be that the signal booster saved your television. The TV repair man said that lots of other people lost their TVs - the lightning had gone right into them. They didn't know about the storm because they were sleeping, but I told him you were awake and heard a loud bang."

Sure did. I heard something. Maybe that was it. Maybe the loose wires in the loft also helped save the TV by weakening the surge - but it's conjecture on my part. I'm still confused. Maybe it was just that the loose wires happened to kill the signal booster when they 'went'.

I'm only glad the TV is coming with me after all, and that I don't have to get a new one. It's an old CRT (13 years old) but I'm perfectly happy with it - the screen is bigger than I could afford if I got an LCD - and the cats can't push it over no matter how they lean on it...

So... got off lightly, and learned a new lesson. Disconnect the aerial (along with everything else) if it looks even slightly like a storm.

May 7, 2007 at 17:12 o\clock

Well-Being (or should it be Well-being?) Now I'm confused again

Mood: More relaxed than I should be - I should be cracking on
Listening to: Ghost song in my head: 'Leaving it All Up to You' by the Osmonds


That's why I'm leaving it all up to yooooooo
You decide
What you're gonna dooooo
Now do you want my lurrrrve?
Or are we through?

I get that song in my head periodically - I was very young when it was in the charts, but I guess it shows my age! Once it's in my head I can never get it out again.

Like everyone else, I have my blind spots, and computers don't always help. When I'm busy editing, I often come across the phrase 'well-being'. The minute I hit it, I think "oh no - I can never remember whether or not it should be hyphenated." It usually isn't hyphenated when I spot it. The spell-checker doesn't help. It suggests I pick either 'well-being' or 'well being'. I don't know how to stop it offering me that choice.

I dread to think how many times I have looked up 'well being' in my spelling dictionary (I use Oxford). It's one of the most-used reference books on my shelves.

The book growls, "for the last time!! It's WELL-BEING! How many times do I have to tell you that?"
"It's Word's fault," I mumble... "it keeps telling me I can use either."
"Ach! Word!" snorts the little spelling book. "It can't spell anything right."

Just out of interest, I tried my Mac widget dictionary. I tried 'wellbeing', and it responded "'wellbeing' could not be found." So I tried 'well being', and it responded "'well being' could not be found." So then I tried 'well-being'.

"Ah!" It said. "Well-being - noun. The state of being comfortable, healthy or happy."

OK - I'm quite comfortable with that. For the time being.

May 6, 2007 at 23:23 o\clock

Shopping for Notebooks

Mood: Slightly more confident
Listening to: Jaunty tinnitus


Oopsies.

All these Notebooks and things cost far more than I was expecting. I wonder if I would be able to load my copy of XML Spy onto this one?

I hope my PC doesn't die completely any time soon, as I'm nowhere near prepared.

Apr 23, 2007 at 16:19 o\clock

World's Smartest Washing Machine

Mood: Looking around for spooks
Listening to: Nothing


This is my washing machine - I took the photo today. I don't know of anyone else whose machine hangs up their washing.

Washing machine with small white blanket stretched across the opening


© Diddums, 2007

Mar 28, 2007 at 00:58 o\clock

Baulked

Mood: Not smiling
Listening to: Ghostly song in my head: 'Madrigal' by Neil Diamond


Shortly after Fusspot died, I tried to send an email to his breeder (Kristin). I kept it short and sweet but it was hard to write, and I was vexed when I hit the 'send' button and it popped back up, saying something like 'relay not permitted'. My ISP seems to go through these spells periodically - it's as though they disable it while they fix something. I know that I don't have to do anything about it, and after a few minutes or an hour it will be working again.

It's still annoying. On this occasion I was about to go out and wouldn't be back till the evening, and I wanted to feel that email had been posted and was out of the way. I tried several times before leaving the house, and every time it was refused. It was still sitting there on my desktop - "Dear Kristin, Fusspot has passed away. It was a shock and we are all missing him. He was such a character and the house is so quiet now that he's gone." (That's not it exactly, but it's a simple summary).

I went out for the day. It took me a long time to rally again - I didn't expect the email to have such an effect on me, but it did. It was as though my brain was plugged into the wall-socket and given a short, sharp shock.

At the supermarket I was setting food on the conveyor belt and glanced up for a moment. There was a dark-haired girl standing at the head of a different queue, staring at me in an arrested way - not as though she wanted to criticize something, but more as though she was thinking "she looks sad."

At which point I realized I did - I wasn't looking at anybody, just frowning at the food; mouth turned down at the corners.

I won't say I immediately perked up and tried to look cheerful - I know that people think we're supposed to smile no matter what and that it's supposed to make everybody feel better. When I'm not feeling smiley, I don't smile. If I really have to, then I do, but on the whole it's too tiring!

When I finally got home, I sent the email, and off it went without a backward glance. The ISP problem was fixed.

After a couple of days I started to worry. It didn't seem like Kristin to not respond about one of the cats dying. I asked my sister if Kristin was away. "I don't think so," she said. "She doesn't get all her emails, you know. Quite a lot of them never get there. The most recent was one from Dick about a kitten she was supposed to be collecting. Send her the email again - that's what I do."

I felt uneasy - what if she received the first email? If I sent it again, she might think I was nagging.
I gave her another day, then sent it again.

This time she responded in minutes - "gosh, what a shock, Diddums. I never expected that. You will find the house very quiet without him."

A couple of emails went back and forward - then one was again unanswered, and I left it for a few days. It was a direct question, and as Kristin wasn't replying, it had presumably gone missing. So I sent it again. Another day went by, and suddenly a response came; slightly defensive. "I had a crash, which is why I didn't answer before..."

That's an ISP known for swallowing emails without letting anybody know. It has (or had) a deliberate policy of not informing the sender that the email was rejected as possible spam. Kristin knows about it, but claims all ISPs do this. That's her reason for not changing to another ISP.

It's a little unfair on her friends. Our messages are just disappearing into a vast black hole. Some of them we resend when nothing happens, but we don't know about them all. When you're wondering why something hasn't been replied to, you realize maybe it's because of the ISP doing a 'snatch and grab'... but (being an insecure person) you also have other thoughts running through your mind, such as:

  • Is she angry with me?
  • Is she away? When does she get back?
  • Will she be annoyed if I send that email again? I don't want to seem to be nagging her.
  • WHY is she still with that ISP???
  • Maybe she finds it convenient to duck certain messages and this ISP is a useful scapegoat.
  • Maybe she does most of her talking on the phone and feels the email situation is not important. Well it is for me - I can't use the phone.

I should direct my annoyance at the ISP who does this rather than at my friend who is as much a victim as I am - but you wouldn't be human if these thoughts didn't trot through your mind.

Dec 3, 2006 at 13:24 o\clock

This Cantankerous Scot Rebels Again

Mood: Snorting
Listening to: Nothing


This blog is in the process of moving to WordPress. This post can be found there.
Happy

I have been looking on-line at the spellings supersede and supercede. There are a lot of claims that supercede is incorrect, whereas the Oxford English Dictionary (unless this information is out of date) claims that supercede is valid and disputed rather than incorrect.

'Disputed' it could well be, because so many spell it that way - and not without reason.

A comment on this site says that the Scots used superceid.

I do have a preference for supercede - but that's probably because I'm a cantankerous Scot who was brought up to spell it that way.

Just as I dialled up to check a few sites on the subject, thinking 'dictionaries, dictionaries' to myself, my eye was caught by my daily horoscope. It said:

The dictionary may define an obstacle as 'a person or thing that obstructs progress,' but today any obstacles you face will have quite the opposite effect. When someone tells you 'no' today, all you'll hear is a challenge to change this person's mind. You are up to the task, and you're eager to make all obstacles disappear.

Good. It's supercede. Diddums has spoken.