This Cantankerous Scot Rebels Again
Mood: Snorting
Listening to: Nothing
This blog is in the process of moving to WordPress. This post can be found there.

I have been looking on-line at the spellings supersede and supercede. There are a lot of claims that supercede is incorrect, whereas the Oxford English Dictionary (unless this information is out of date) claims that supercede is valid and disputed rather than incorrect.
'Disputed' it could well be, because so many spell it that way - and not without reason.
A comment on this site says that the Scots used superceid.
I do have a preference for supercede - but that's probably because I'm a cantankerous Scot who was brought up to spell it that way.
Just as I dialled up to check a few sites on the subject, thinking 'dictionaries, dictionaries' to myself, my eye was caught by my daily horoscope. It said:
The dictionary may define an obstacle as 'a person or thing that obstructs progress,' but today any obstacles you face will have quite the opposite effect. When someone tells you 'no' today, all you'll hear is a challenge to change this person's mind. You are up to the task, and you're eager to make all obstacles disappear.
Good. It's supercede. Diddums has spoken.


supersede Also (earlier) -cede. L15.
The L15 refers to use of supercede beginning around the late fifteenth century. It doesn't say anything about supersede being wrong.
Perhaps it is just a Scottish quirk but I've always used the -cede spelling. Supersede sounds more like some kind of humungous, prize winning vegetable.
Quite a strange place that Everything2.com, I've added it to my list of Very Odd Encyclopaedias. It doesn't yet have an entry for "Diddums" though it does suggest that "Bunnyman" might be an unsavoury character, quite mad and having some anti-social habits. Seems there's even a bridge named after me.
Well at least it has some good "vegan pizza" recipes. :-)
I imagine, given the flexibility of English (and the often mind-boggling lack of logical development it follows), that any previously used spellings could be considered "correct." I'm a New Englander, born and raised, yet I spell things like 'cheque' and 'behaviour.' I have no excuse for it, but I don't make excuses for it, either. If I'm getting my point across, it doesn't really matter whether I use archaic or "British" spelling.
"The L15 refers to use of supercede beginning around the late fifteenth century. It doesn't say anything about *supercede* being wrong."
Oops, looks like I'm buying myself that new spelling DVD for Christmas.
PS Bunnyman, I didn't think to explore the rest of everything2.com - I'll have to have a look, especially if it has recipes!
I intend to stick with Supercede!
There, the comment box spell-checker has just put a red line under 'supercede'.
(Coshes it with giant humungous vegetable).
It doesn't recognize 'coshes' or 'humungous' either.
Researchers claim that a number of words are misspelt simply because we're too clever.
For example, the English word most commonly
Many of us wrongly come up with ' supercede' because of our knowledge of other words including intercede or precede. The word itself comes from the Latin super-sedere, meaning to desist.
The same temptation to refer to our experience of other words causes us to come a cropper with consensus, liquefy and sacrilegious.
They are among scores of examples found by researchers for Collins dictionaries, who ran thousands of documents through a software program designed to pick up spelling mistakes.
They included published books and articles, as well as internet blogs, to ensure that they covered a wide range of writing styles and media.
Supersede was by far the most commonly misspelt word, although it was wrong only one time out of ten.
Consensus is frequently spelt incorrectly as concensus because the writer wrongly believes that it relates to the word census which comes from the Latin censere, to assess. Consensus, however, derives from the Latin consentire, to agree.
When it comes to liquefy, many
The same applies to sacrilegious which is often misspelt as sacreligious (as with religious) and inoculate because many know the word innocuous contains a double 'n'.
Ian Brookes, managing editor of dictionaries at Collins, said: 'The real spelling problems occur when people have learnt the rules or have a bit of knowledge, but make mistakes in how they apply this.'
Another common reason for misspelling is where words are spelt differently from their pronunciation or when they come from a foreign language.
Collins is holding a public vote next month to find out which word schoolchildren think has the stupidest spelling.
The Spelling Society has campaigned for the past 100 years for a simplified and phonetic form of spelling. It has backed a campaign launched by lecturer Ken Smith, from Buckinghamshire New University, to compile a list of variant spellings which would include common misspellings including thier, arguement, ignor and speach.
Its chairman, Jack Bovill, said: 'Clearly changes are taking place moving towards a more logical form of spelling. The readiness of people to accept what Ken Smith calls variant spellings will not create a world catastrophe.'
A survey for the Spelling Society in May found half of adults unable to spell words such as embarrassed, liaison or millennium.
English is a living language, therefore changes to spelling of the more difficult words are to be expected.
New words are added each year, we have the Americans to be thanked for their additions, Watergate, mugging, stalking, friendly fire, drive by shooting to name but a few!