Precise Human Thought (PHT) - a new way of understanding how you think
Mood: Waiting and hoping
Listening to: Reading The Ultimate Resource - great book.
Precise Human Thought (PHT)
This is a way to describe how people think.
By using this approach we can write down the logic that people use in coming to decisions.
As a further benefit, this method allows one to include the conflicting thoughts that people have and so can see how people make different decisions depending of various factors. Time pressure, or the effect of recent events that make certain stimulus more important, for example may get people to make different decisions.
But first, an example:
As any child knows safety lies in staying on the sidewalk ("path" in the United Kingdom).
So Rule 1 is: "Stay on the sidewalk".
But there are exceptions to this rule.
Rule 2 is "Act to be safe and move away from fatal danger".
Rule 3 is "If a object is getting larger quickly then it may be a threat".
Rule 4 is "If an object is moving sideways with respect to he background it will not collide with you"
Rule 5 is "If an object is getting big quickly and if is moving toward you then you may get hit".
(Note that this last Rule is similar to earlier ones. Having Rules with similar i.e overlapping scope is allowed. )
Rule 6 is "If the object seems big - like a car then run away".
Rule 7 is : "If you are in danger then run onto the road".
As you can see there set of rules allow for a child to run in the road -
violating Rule 1 if there is a danger that makes this behavior the most
prudent actions in the circumstances.
In this way we have been able to write done a set of rules that describe the action that the normal child will take to avoid being hit by a car.
Obviously evolution plays a part.
Those child who do not have such rules will be killed by staying of the side walk and the genes will not propagate to other generations.
This seems to agree with reality i.e. children with out the correct survival behaviors fail to have further children.
This advantage of this method of describing the rules is that you can have many rules that are correct in some limited circumstances.
You could program a computer with the rules and get the computer to
act in the same way that the person would.
Another attractive feature of this methods is that you can have rules
supplied by many experts and the rules may conflict and the system of rules will still work. i.e. even though the exact time when the
child perceives the danger may be thought to be different by different experts, the rules will tend to support each other and get the same result.
This method allows one to use rules gleaned from different experts and
determine a result according to the consensus of these experts.
In older decision making (or expert) systems you had to decide which expert was correct and use that expert result , discarding the other experts' views.
Using 'PHT" you can include all the differing views in the rule base and let the computer decide the result in real time.
There can also be some fine tuning which will allow some of the rules to be removed where they are redundant.
This permits the computer to arrive to a conclusion sooner, or permits to use less powerful and cheaper computers.
In your normal life you can see the rules that you and others follow in making decisions.
See what rules you children use. This may help you understand your child's behavior. When you write out the rules your child uses you can us this to help him see why you and he differ - in the teenage years this will be a useful way of making him see the consequences of various choices.
If you would like to post examples you have observed or any other
commentsyou have, I would be delighted to see them.
