There were three Doctors , that my jobs insurance carrier,sent
me to. The first one was before the operation.
The first Doctor I saw , on June 5, 1996. His report .
The claimant is working . He states that when he raises
his arms overhead , i.e. when the elbows reach above shoulder
level , he develops pain in the shoulder. He points to the
suprascapular fossa, at his lateral end, on the left. He states
that he has a knot '' in this location. Physical Exam ;
reveals a 6 ' tall 165 pound male, who appears in good
health . The contour of the shoulder girdle is normal.
There is a suggestion of a slight atrophy of the supraspinatus
muscle on the left side. Range of motion of the shoulder
is entirely normal. When lowering his arm, I palpated a
1'' diameter firm mass, about three inches from the distal
end of the spine of the scapula, in the supra spinatus muscle.
Pressure on this region elicited complaints of pain. There
are no signs of impingement.l
Diagnosis: History of the left shoulder strain . Findings are
compatible with tear of the left supraspinatus muscle. If the
history , as giving by the claiment , is correct , there is a
causal relationship .
Disability : Claimant is working without functional disability.
He states , however , that he experiences pain when he
performs work that requires him to raise his arms so that the
elbows are above shoulder level.
Treatment : The claimant has not seen an orthopedist, as
yet. He wants to ask his physician to send him to one. This
is acceptable . I do not belive that the condition, however ,
is treatable. Fortunately , it is self limiting. Improvement
can be expected with time.
When I went to see this doctor , I told him that I can do
most of my job without help, but it takes a little longer, but
I do need help with a few things . Same Doctor:
August 21 , 1996.
An MRI of the claimant's left shoulder was performed on July 30,
1996. It was reported to show a full thickness rotator cuff
tear of a degenerative supraspinatus tendon with retraction
of the supraspinatus muscle. There was arthritis of the AC
joint and a moderate to large effusion of the joint . The
findings are consistent with my diagnosis.
The claimant's functional disability is as I reported in my
report on June 5, 1996 and my opinions remain the same.
When I was told to go back to him in August , I was told
to bring any x-rays, MRI"S, with me , and I did.
of the