bearded nutters
Listened to a radio show today in which they said that we should stop calling people islamic extremists and just call them bearded nutters. Sounds like a good idea to me. I read in the news that a bunch of bearded nutters have demanded that the pope is sacked. Now I'm not a catholic but I don't think that it works like that. They came out with this wonderfully diplomatic statement:
"The Pope, and all infidels, should know that no Muslim, under any circumstances, can tolerate an insult to the Prophet [Muhammad]. If the West does not change its stance regarding Islam, it will face severe consequences," said the joint statement.
So not threatening in any way then. I think that seperating the idea of what is a muslim from a bearded nutter is probably a good thing. All the muslims that I know aren't bearded nutters though they are pretty pissed off with our great leader, as am I.
I've seen a lot of people wondering recently why there hasn't been a big uproar in the islamic world about Darfur in which about 200,000 muslims have been slaughtered. I had a conversation touching on it the other day and I think the answer is quite simple. Firstly people don't know. My friend didn't know they were muslim and he's fairly up to date on the news. Secondly it doesn't really affect them. Sudan has never done anything to piss off the rest of the islamic world so it's not on peoples radar. The reason that you have such big demonstrations against the west, in the middle east, at the drop of a hat is because of history. It's not just about Lebanon, Iraq or Palestine, or even some stupid cartoons, it's about over 100 years of abuse.
We conquer them, then we impose unpoular dictatorships, then we take their oil, then we steal their land and put a bunch of europeans there (that's basically what happened), then we impose monetary policies that destroy their economies through the world bank, then we impose our political will through an organisation designed to give them an unequal level of power. Thats why they are a bit pissed of!
But we did that to africa and south america and they don't blow many people up (well not often anyway). The thing is the middle east does have something that unifies it, islam. Even though there are many bitter differences when western governments piss on them there is a more unified response, at least from the populace. I think that scares the shit out of western governments hence the demonisation.
But why aren't there african and south american bearded nutters? We're just as shitty to them. Does islam make you more inclined to be violent? I think that africa and south america has got it's fair share of bearded nutters but in the middle east religion has been very skillfully manipulated by the them. They use peoples anger and then bring religious fervour into it creating a very heady mix. And when you bring religion into things you can say or do almost anything, after all it's gods will isn't it? The worst thing is that people who are against the nutters can't do much because the reasons behind the anger are justified it's the methods that are wrong.
The things is though that if things get much worse then maybe it won't just be the bearded nutters. What happens if everyone gets so pissed off with the unfairness of the world that they start to really support violent opposition. Now that is scary, but how far away is it? And anyway how nuts is it to fight against oppression.

