Bibles, Babies, and Bullets

Sep 6, 2005 at 06:00 o\clock

Hurricane Katrina: The Moral Catastrophe


Many people, especially the president of the United States, balk at the idea that they could in any way be responsible for the bad things that happen to good people. If those bad things are done by something (hurricane) or someone else, then we aren’t involved in ethical decision making and therefore absolved from moral responsibility.  This is the reasoning of a five-year old, it is not acceptable in “compassionate” adults. A ship owner who sends an old ship with a full crew and cargo out to sea hoping that a storm won’t brew, has decided to risk lives for profit. He hasn't simply decided to make money, he has decided that making money is more imporant than protecting lives.

Like the ship owner, the Bush administration and members of congress are morally responsible for what happens to the people on their ship. Hurricane Katrina was a mighty storm, but the magnitude of harm and horror inflicted was due to human decisions and choices.  The administration and members of congress were warned repeatedly by scientists, engineers, city planners, risk management experts and scores of others that the city of New Orleans and surrounding areas would not survive or be able to cope with a Katrina level hurricane without significant federal investment, planning and assistance. Emergency planners have known for years that poverty and lack of transportation in the New Orleans area would doom the poor to certain death. The federal government  turned a blind eye, diverted funds to invasions instead of evacuations, and left the matter of sinking, drowning and swimming to local authorities and private individuals.  This is what Hannah Arendt, the philosopher analyst of the Holocust,  meant by "the banality of evil."  We don’t have  to build a gas chamber to inflict unspeakable harm, we just need to look the other way and let the vulnerable sink or swim.

The obligation to protect American lives on American soil begins with an assessment of needs and risks.  Hurricanes, earthquakes, floods, epidemics, unsafe driving, poverty,  and lack of healthcare destroy more lives and property than “terrorist” attacks.The Bush administration and congress know this, they have the numbers.  What they lack is a moral compass and the courage to do the right thing for America’s most vulnerable. Instead of investing in the basic life sustaining necessities, such as a public health system that works, they have squandered the wealth and trust of a nation on tax breaks for millionaires, terrorists who still run free,  and “democracies” that don’t want to be. They should step down. There are plenty of decent, courageous people in the gulf shores area who stepped up to do the right thing, let these men and women  take over.



Comments for this entry:

  1. insider2 wrote at Sep 6, 2005 at 06:36 o\clock:I hope Katrina will eventually be noted in history books in the same way as the strikes at the Gdansk shipyards were (they were the start of the downfall of Communism, perhaps Katrina can be seen as the start of the downfall of Capitalism). I know it seems a big stretch, Capitalism is so all powerful now but so was Communism just before its downfall. Both these systems are totally morally bankrupt and need to be replaced with a tried and tested system that has been shown to work - Socialism.
  2. Buzzard wrote at Sep 7, 2005 at 05:53 o\clock:I wish, but I don\'t hope for an uprising against American Corporatism (it\'s not simple capitalism, but more like the fascist corporate-government contract, hard to beat down without an invading army or two). If I believed it were possible to mobilize a massive social movement against the United Corpocratic State of America, I would be in the trenches or on the soapbox. Somewhere interesting! Unfortunately, I tend to limit myself to what I know I can do, such as go on a rampage to change local traffic conditions and speed limits for young and old pedestians.



    I won\'t bore you with my community service projects near and far, suffice it to say that they stem from and satisfy my socialist urges. Yes, I\'m a socialist adrift in a sea of petty capitalists who are being squeezed by the corporatists! You\'d think think that anyone with a brain cell to spare would understand the survival advantage of communal effort for social animals such as humans, but as I imlied in my previous College 101 \"rant and rave\" Americas best and brightest appear to have just half a brain cell and the Intelligent Designer is responsible.
  3. davecathy wrote at Sep 13, 2005 at 18:59 o\clock:Apart from the racial overtones of the disaster, which would indicate that the Civil War is not yet won, it seems to me that the gulf between rich and poor in Amirica is as great as that in France before the French revolution, and is just as dangerous. If things do not change pretty damn quick I fear for the long term survival of USA as a single entity, the break up coming as a result of domestic pressure, either in the form of a racially related revolution, or a strong separatist movement that will tear the country apart.
  4. davecathy wrote at Oct 26, 2005 at 02:03 o\clock:I saw a very interesting interview on TV the other day.

    Colin Powell was being interviewed about the Palestine problem. Regarding one particular idea, he said, straighfaced

    \"It was a very simple idea I was putting forward. Even President Bush understood it. \"

    Damned by faint praise? Perhaps God explained it to him.

Log in to comment:

Attention: many blogigo features are only available to registered users. Register now without any obligations and get your free weblog!